Serious Einstein did not understand the rudiments of mechanics

[ChanRasjid]

Einstein had no understanding of the rudimentary concepts of mechanics and yet he tried to develop a "new relativistic mechanics" as a replacement to Newtonian mechanics...

"A Gift of God and Isaac Newton"
http://www.emc2fails.com/html/godsgift/godsgift-v2.html

quote:...Einstein (at age 26) in his 1905 paper proposed his special theory of relativity based on his light postulate:
"The speed of light is a universal constant(invariant) independent of the motion of the observer":
But just because Einstein used the term ‘speed’ does not mean it has anything to do with speed as a concept in Newtonian mechanics. We may call an elephant a swan and this new ‘swan’ will still never ever fly. The concept of speed in Newtonian mechanics is not dependent on the type of motion or the thing of which motion we measure the speed. So the speed of light in Newtonian mechanics, as a defined concept, must always be relative or dependent on the motion of the observer - speed is always non-invariant.

Of course, my papers refuting Einstein's theories will not be mentioned in any physics papers from the universities around the world; one must be an insider to have his papers acknowledged - it is all about academic politics.

Unfortunate for the world, we are now wasting billions to perform experiments just to prove Einstein right; the Large Hadron Collide LHC, gravitational waves, black holes, Higgs boson, neutrinos,...etc.
[EDIT] The advancement of physics has been delayed just because of the "WORK" of one man.

Best regards,
Chan Rasjid
"E=mc2 In valid"
http://www.emc2fails.com

 

[blackmondy]

You expect Einstein to refute you ?

 

[ChanRasjid]

Assume this.

A car is approaching you at a speed of 100 kmh.
1) You are standing on the road side measuring the speed of the approaching car; the speed is 100kmh.
2) You are driving at 80kmh TOWARDS the car and measuring it's speed; the measured speed is 100+80 = 180kmh.
3) You are driving at 80kmh AWAY from the car and measuring it's speed; the measured speed is 100-80 = 20kmh.

Einstein wanted you to believe that if replacing the approaching car with a beam of light (say from a torch light), you would have the (SAME) measured speed of light ("non-invariant universal constant" of 299,792,458 meter/second) for cases 1), 2) and 3); i.e. you don't need to add/subtract your speed moving towards/away the beam of light. How about it!

If you talk about the "greatness achievement of Einstein", indeed he has no equal. He now has the people from all nations worshiping him and applauding his relativity theories. Even the "greatest" mind from the top Chinese universities such as Tsinghua, Peking and Fudan - a race which tout itself as backed by 5000 years of civilization - all are worshiping Einstein. This speak tons about the "greatness" of the Chinese race. We should let Xi Jinping know about the great race he is leading and of the Chinese government's hope to spread China's soft-power for the benefit of all mankind.

The propaganda promoting myth of Einstein is so all-pervading that even my teenage grand nephew/niece was told that Einstein is especial - having an IQ of 200, the man who "created" the atomic bomb, E=mc2, ... That "somebody" or a "busybody" stole Einstein's brain from the hospital when Einstein died and have it kept in a jar with formaldehyde. When they examined the brain of Einstein under a microscope, to their "NOT SO GREAT SURPRISE", they found that Einstein has brain "neurons" (whatever-rons!) that are different from the brain-rons of common people, e.g. those from sammyboys!

The greatest achievement of Einstein is that he could fool the supposedly most intelligent people of our times - the physicists with Ph.D.

Best regards,
Chan Rasjid
"Einstein's 'E=mc2 Is Invalid"
http://www.emc2fails.com

 

[blackmondy]

So what's your agenda in disproving Einstein's theories ? You lost your credibility to me when you said the moon doesn't rotate when NASA proved it does.
What makes you so right and Einstein so wrong ? If you insist you're so right then why don't you go voice your displeasure to the relevant authorities instead of babbling here ? You think anyone will give a fuck here ?

 

[saynotomsm]

Albert Einstein was a Zionist jew that stole everyone's invention. He's no scientist he's less important then trash.

 

[ChanRasjid]

View attachment 167238

Albert Einstein was a Zionist jew that stole everyone's invention. He's no scientist he's less important then trash.

But someone may question your "agenda"? What is your purpose of posting the video here? It is not one that could be found easily.

Chan Rasjid
"Einstein's E=mc2 is Invalid"
http://www.emc2fails.com

 

[ChanRasjid]

"In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." - Galileo Galilei

"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them."
- Galileo Galilei

It is said that the two greatest unsolved mysteries in physics are gravity and mass. If you could solve the mysteries, you would surely get the Nobel prize. Sorry! Not So! You'll get the Nobel prize provided your theory is built upon Einstein's general relativity of curve space, etc, otherwise no Nobel prize for you.

"Coulomb Electric Gravity And A simple Unified Theory"
http://www.emc2fails.com/html/unified_theory/unified_theory.html

My above paper gives the theory that could explain gravity and mass. The problem is there is no complicated mathematics involved.

First about gravity. It is well known that the gravitational law and the Coulomb's law of electrical interactions are both inverse square laws. Physicists have always puzzled over why always inverse square. The answer is simple. They are from the same source - electrical! Coulomb's law is about electrical attraction and repulsion between unlike and like charges. Macrocospic bodies (beyond atoms, molecules, protons, electrons,...) all are electrically neutral and therefore their electrical attractions/repulsions due to their protons/electrons should balance out. So we expect that two neutral bodies should not have electrical attraction/repulsion. But the attractive and repulsive forces don't cancel out. There is a miniscule remnants of forces: "the total electric attractions is greater then the total repulsions". It is this remnant of electrical attraction over repulsion that is what we call gravity! It is also the reason why gravity too is an inverse square law as it comes from the same Coulomb's inverse square law.
Galileo: "All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered."

Now about mass. Say your body mass is 65 kg. You get together a quantity of tomatoes that adds to 65 kg. So there is a "similarity" between your body and that quantity of tomatoes - both have the same mass. What is that which gives both bodies the same mass? The answer is simple. Both have the same number of protons and electrons! If you count the number of protons and electrons in your body and of the tomatoes - the numbers are the same. You may ask: "Then what about the neutrons?" A neutrons is just another special phase of the hydrogen atom - 1 proton + 1 electron. This is the "mystery" of mass.
Galileo: "All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered."

It is only man who prefers scientific truth to be made complicated.

Best regards,
Chan Rasjid
"Einstein's 'E=mc2 Is Invalid"
http://www.emc2fails.com

 

[saynotomsm]