Thick and Black,
You may be a legal ignoramus (singular please - your grammar standards are dropping) but I think LockeLiberal can support you like he tried to support Watchman8 in these other threads.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Criminals blaming the govt
- Thread starter scroobal
- Start date
Thick and Black,
You may be a legal ignoramus (singular please - your grammar standards are dropping) but I think LockeLiberal can support you like he tried to support Watchman8 in these other threads.
Dear Black and Thick,
I have intentionally reversed the order of the adjectives in your nick as you are putting the cart before the horse just as the CPIB did. Fatt Teng actually told the girl that her statement is not "good enough" because the elements of the charge are not made out! In other words, he did not investigate with an open mind as most professional detectives would.
Back to this mitigation thingy which comes AFTER the verdict is out. What irks many intelligent people is the way the CPIB investigators acted; the way the trial was conducted, hampering the defence in every way possible; the media circus and character assassination of which Scroobal and you, oops I forgot, both of you are controlled by the same TEAM are hired to do (what has cheapskate got to do it?), etc.
With all the glaring efforts put into bending the normal rules of investigative, prosecutorial and judicial conduct, biased media, Singaporeans are right to question if the real "crime" is writing this, the last straw in a series of unflattering scribbling:
http://www.law.hku.hk/ccpl/pub/TeyTsunHang.html
Hello, the ones that are being accused of being ChowKa (gangster) are the CPIB people - using force to get statements and confessions. ChowKuan (cheapskate) is the character assassination that the PAP IBs are busy trying to do. There is no such crime.
To put it simply in layman terms, the charge is sex FOR grades and the star witness already said there was no such bargain. Case closed. The judge should halt the proceedings there and then, chastise the CPIB for their behaviour and recommend a commission of inquiry, but he have the balls to do that?
I have intentionally reversed the order of the adjectives in your nick as you are putting the cart before the horse just as the CPIB did. Fatt Teng actually told the girl that her statement is not "good enough" because the elements of the charge are not made out! In other words, he did not investigate with an open mind as most professional detectives would.
Back to this mitigation thingy which comes AFTER the verdict is out. What irks many intelligent people is the way the CPIB investigators acted; the way the trial was conducted, hampering the defence in every way possible; the media circus and character assassination of which Scroobal and you, oops I forgot, both of you are controlled by the same TEAM are hired to do (what has cheapskate got to do it?), etc.
With all the glaring efforts put into bending the normal rules of investigative, prosecutorial and judicial conduct, biased media, Singaporeans are right to question if the real "crime" is writing this, the last straw in a series of unflattering scribbling:
http://www.law.hku.hk/ccpl/pub/TeyTsunHang.html
Hello, the ones that are being accused of being ChowKa (gangster) are the CPIB people - using force to get statements and confessions. ChowKuan (cheapskate) is the character assassination that the PAP IBs are busy trying to do. There is no such crime.
To put it simply in layman terms, the charge is sex FOR grades and the star witness already said there was no such bargain. Case closed. The judge should halt the proceedings there and then, chastise the CPIB for their behaviour and recommend a commission of inquiry, but he have the balls to do that?
Last edited:
What has suicide got to do with this? Please elaborate? Oh Master Yoda, I’m afraid I don’t get this Jedi mind trick.
So what are you implying? That we should treat all second generation descendents of rich families with suspicion? Crab logic and incoherent thinking
! Some rich families have second generations that are leading their countries to ruin through bad policies. Is that not a greater sin? Or are you saying that critics needed to be silenced, so these second generations don’t have to bother with multi tasking for which they are ill suited. Something missing in their DNA.
First, Chee’s case is in itself questionable. Read posts in other threads that suggested that the wife’s research was related to his own, so it is not as if he claimed courier expenses so that his wife could get the latest model Gucci handbag before it hits the stores in Sinkieland. Even if it is a crime, there is the very important principle of proportionality. In other words, the punishment must fit the crime. How many dollars were involved? A firing from his lecturer post was proportionate? Please go and get your Jedi head examined.
Second, NO politician is involved in this case.
Third, a more appropriate comparison would be with Chris Lingle.
Four, are you now blurring the distinction between political party and government? Isn’t that something the PAPzis always like to do?
Fifth, why are you bringing irrelevant things up? What mind trick are you using? Please enlighten me. I like to be able to fool others with subliminal messages aka Shitty Times.
Irrelevant comparison, trying to take advantage of Sinkies’ nostalgia for a respected and dead politician. There is a funny thing with these PAPzis. They persecute their political opponents when those are alive. Once they are SAFELY six feet underground, these very same PAPzis take advantage of Sinkies’ good feelings towards these DEAD opponents. Why’s that? Oh, Master Yoda, you have a lot to teach me.
This technique is shall I say – try to make it appear inconsequential. The Sinkie electorate needs to learn to see beyond their noses. Rule of law and right to a fair trial affects everyone. If others can be bullied by the almighty State, all other Sinkies are not safe. That's how the Nazis managed to bullied some then later all Germans is a case in point, hence the afore video #9.
Last edited:
You should surrender your qualifications at once to whichever university awarded them.
(1) A man who received his female student's money, virginity and a dozen other material perks -- at a time when he directed controlled her grades, and the girl later claimed she was not trying to bribe him,
is TOTALLY different from, for example,:
(2) a man who allegedly touched a woman's buttocks, and the woman later claimed she did not feel that it was a molest case.
You obviously don't know the difference. Your reply to be shows an obvious attempt at obfuscation -- just like you tried with Lockeliberal in the other thread, and which he royally called you out and fucking shamed you.
You unqualified TWIT. You should drop your Shitty Times pen right now and go and attend night school!
You farking unqualified TWIT. These 2 cases are not even related. The first is for and offence under Section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and the second is under the Penal Code. 2 different provisions in 2 different statutes each with its own DIFFERENT requirements. Why you have confused your PAP assignments? They are making you overtime plugging holes and controlling minds?
There is no sex FOR grades. Prosecution has FAILED to make out each and every element of the crime BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT period. You're a farking disgrace to the "establishment" if you don't know what even a 1st year law student does. LOL!
Last edited:
What do you want him to read?
CAN A FUCKING RUNNING DOG READ?
RUNNING DOGGIE CAN ONLY DO WHAT THEIR FUCKING PAYMASTERS TELL THEM TO DO
READING IS TOTALLY IMMATERIAL TO THEM AT ALL.
THEY CAN ONLY REGURGITATE AND VOMIT OUT WHAT THEY ARE TO VOMIT
Locke's credibility in this forum totally destroyed. Your TEAM should face this reality. In this post he claimed to have ZERO legal training:
Yet, here he could describe with clarity and precision impending and as yet unpublished changes to criminal litigation process. He is from one of the stakeholders in this process - AGC, Courts or defence lawyer. Simple as that. And I forgot to mention that his mission here is to pretend to clarify while actually doing his very best to obfuscate the issues.
This is a bizarre individual. I cannot make it out. He is somewhat connected to the law either a clerk working in a law firm, or did not complete his law studies or has a family member in law. Could also be a case similar to Robert Ho. Always well written and then you find something bizarre like Tony Blair stifled his son's study. I remember Martyn See was taken in for a while.
Deleted as video not properly attached.
Last edited:
Looking at the nonsense you spout, I really miss the JW's poems against you.
And you?? A disgruntled SPH employee trying to get back into PAP's good books?
To put it simply it is a rigged game in politics and the criminal courts can be used to silence dissenters by denying them a fair trial. The Shitty Times and the PAP IB here will use terms that the layman doesn't understand and FAULTY LOGIC to portrait it as normal.
As the dog said in this video, "there is something awfully SCREWY" about this trial. Even before it began all rules of fair play have already been discarded and as it proceeds it is clear that the referee is biased.
[video=youtube;ZMXYrQBwNK0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMXYrQBwNK0[/video]
Last edited:
There is a bizarre Scroobal. Appears to write well but if one analyse closely, the Shitty Times subliminal messages, faulty logic, etc stares you in the face. Other Samsters thinks he is somewhat connected with the State Propaganda Machine, left in disgrace perhaps, but I don’t know and couldn’t care less. Probably could not get into an elite faculty like medicine or law. Ended up with some liberal arts degree of no commercial use, then to Shitty Times to write nonsense to befuddle the masses. When beaten fair and square in a debate, instead of facing the truth and improving himself, he shoots off a post to his clone Thick Skull and Black Arse cursing, insinuating, making false allegations and analogies, etc.
All his allegations are false. Sinkies know that PAPzis when cornered always hit under the belt and make baseless allegations in a vain attempt to damage the credibility of the other side. Perhaps, what really irks Scroobal is that he has no answer to posts #6, 9, 12 and 23.
Correct: (what has cheapskate got to do with it?)
He is a manipulative piece of shit.
This is classic pappy behaviour, inherited or acquired from you-know-who.
He will give a label, provide some description and narrative, get people to agree with him, praise those who agree, mention them specifically in future diatribes, mock and insult those who disagree or dare to argue, drop a few names, provide some historical background, and eventually he gets to call the shots on any topic you mention. Overbearing, arrogant, manipulative.
And he is deluded enough to think that he is doing it for the greater good or for altruistic reasons. Anyone with half a brain will realise that someone who posts things online for the benefit of others, will not need to take credit or have his internet moniker regarded as being infallible and "credible".
They will just post things because it benefits others. What a deluded and manipulative hypocrite.
Similar threads
