• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Casino DAILY Levy is now $150

bobby

Alfrescian
Loyal
More Singaporeans seek help for gambling even as casino levies drop

More people are seeking help for their gambling problems, even as fewer Singaporeans and permanent residents (PRs) visit the casinos of the two integrated resorts that opened in 2010.

Last year, 967 people were counselled - the highest number since 2014 when 1,035 people were counselled, according to data from the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG).

They were counselled at the NCPG's three appointed agencies - the Resilienz Clinic, Psychealth Practice and THK Centre for Family Harmony - as well as the National Addictions Management Service.

But the total number of gamblers seeking help was much higher. At least five groups helping gamblers here are not appointed by the NCPG.

For example, 580 individuals went to the Blessed Grace Social Services for help last year, almost double the 315 in 2015.

Casino levies collected by the Tote Board have plunged since the casinos opened - indicating that gambling there may have lost its novelty and appeal among locals.

But counsellors reckon more people could still be in trouble owing to debt incurred elsewhere, such as online gambling platforms.

On Wednesday last week, the Government said Marina Bay Sands and Resorts World Sentosa will spend about $9 billion to build new attractions and will also be allowed to expand their gambling operations.

np_20190408_casino08_4755aaaa153.jpg


At the same time, social safeguards have been enhanced, with the daily casino entry levy for Singaporeans and PRs raised from $100 to $150 and the annual levy from $2,000 to $3,000 since April 4.

The Tote Board collected $131 million in casino entry levies for the 12 months that ended March last year.

This is a 41 per cent fall from the $223 million collected in the 12 months that ended in March 2011, the first full financial year after the casinos opened in 2010.

The sum of entry levies collected has been falling year on year since the casinos opened. However, the Tote Board did not reveal the number of local visitors each year.

The Casino Regulatory Authority had previously said Singaporeans and PRs made an average of 17,000 visits a day in 2012, down from 20,000 visits a day in 2010 when the casinos first opened.

Another factor behind the fall in visits by locals is that many addicts have banned themselves - or their families have barred them - from the casinos, said We Care Community Services executive director Tham Yuen Han.

At the end of last year, 348,856 people had banned themselves - up 83 per cent from 190,927 in 2014.

More of these self-exclusions are made by Singaporeans and PRs, with 25,759 locals banning themselves last year, compared to 14,877 in 2014. The rest are foreigners.

Counsellors say casino gambling here is not as big a problem as online gambling, usually on football matches, as gamblers can bet on credit online.

Last year's World Cup in Russia could have seen more people incur heavy debts on betting, they added. The previous high of 1,035 people getting counselled, in 2014, was another World Cup year.
 

PTADER

Alfrescian
Loyal
If the casino entry levy was effective in 'protecting' Sinkies, why are many Sinkies still ruined by gambling?

It's not effective, and the CRA clowns are just making a cash grab.

For fuck sake, learn to take responsibility for your own miserable lives. No one put a gun to your, or any Sinkies head, to force them into a casino to gamble.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
raising it to $696 will not deter gambling addicts from paying their way in. this is to deter 1st time curiosity cats.
 

PTADER

Alfrescian
Loyal
It's a matter of principle. It's okay to give money to a casino, but obviously this fee hike is for giving these jiakliaobees a pay raise. :wink:

Casino-Regulatory-Authority-Singapore-2-e1422862034726.jpg

This is not a Muslim/Islam thread so you don't have to resort to pulling falsehoods and illogical nonsense out of your arse, or become incapable of carrying out simple analyses and basic Maths calculations.

With the 5% (for $100,000 and above premium players), 15% (for non-premium players) casino tax on gross gaming revenue and 7% GST on all gaming supplies, all calculated on a monthly basis, the "jiakliaobees" that you refer to stand to reap in a whole fucking lot more in taxes than that increase in $50 entry fee, by allowing Sinkies free and unfettered access to gamble in these casinos.

For fuck sake, brush up on your Maths and basic analytical skills before spewing out conspiracies, nonsense and rubbish.

Also, the money collected on these entry levies is used for social and charitable purposes. It's not to give the "jiakliaobees" a "pay raise".

Learn to get your facts right.
 

ChristoJacb

Alfrescian
Loyal
Yin Nah deh! There is still a boat trip to casino ship on international waters in 1hr. Idiot blood suckers
 

Kee Chew

Alfrescian
Loyal
Screenshot_2019-04-08-18-14-51-234_com.cloudmosa.puffinFree.jpg



Every year Thousands turned 21 y.o. and want to strike riches at the 2 Casinos.

Every year we have new Birds trying out their luck at the 2 Casinos.

Why can't we have some numbers on these folks ???

I think easy Thousands of new horns each year.
Screenshot_2019-04-08-18-14-51-234_com.cloudmosa.puffinFree.jpg
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
The self exclusion for foreigners is more than 10 times the self exclusion for Singaporeans and PRs. If PAP really wants to address any social issues, they should also be imposing a levy for foreigners on work permits.
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The self exclusion for foreigners is more than 10 times the self exclusion for Singaporeans and PRs. If PAP really wants to address any social issues, they should also be imposing a levy for foreigners on work permits.

If they impose levy on foreigners, the casinos will have to shut down.
 

PTADER

Alfrescian
Loyal
The self exclusion for foreigners is more than 10 times the self exclusion for Singaporeans and PRs. If PAP really wants to address any social issues, they should also be imposing a levy for foreigners on work permits.

That shows how much the PAP love and care for Sinkies. They don't bother, and rightly so, about foreigners on work permits.

Sinkies lose money - PAP sad.

Foreigners on work permits lose money - PAP happy.

PAP say thank you foreigners on work permits, for your 15% non-premium player tax to our economy. Sinkies don't like to pay taxes but at the same time, are always demanding for handouts. Please gamble more. This will help us put money into those Sinkie losers' constantly outstretched hands.

1554784696500.png
 
Top