• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

$9000 INSULT. Singapore Males Should Be Allowed To PAY The SCUMs $9K Not To Serve NS.

ahleebabasingaporethief

Alfrescian
Loyal
$9K to serve NS and reservists whilst $380m went to foreigners in the blink of an eye.

How about the many more millions spent for FTs' benefits to welcome them to Singapore?

It's a fucking insult this $9000.

SO SINGAPORE MALES SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO PAY THE SCUMS A $9000 SUM NOT TO SERVE NS OR RESERVISTS. VIS A VIS!

<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="if(typeof(jsCall)=='function'){jsCall();}else{setTimeout('jsCall()',500);}" id="jsProxy" type="hidden"><input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="if(typeof(jsCall)=='function'){jsCall();}else{setTimeout('jsCall()',500);}" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
 
Last edited:

peterpan707

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: $9000 INSULT. Singapore Males Should Be Allowed To PAY The SCUMs $9K Not To Serve

$9K to serve NS and reservists whilst $380m went to foreigners in the blink of an eye.

How about the many more millions spent for FTs' benefits to welcome them to Singapore?

It's a fucking insult this $9000.

SO SINGAPORE MALES SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO PAY THE SCUMS A $9000 SUM NOT TO SERVE NS OR RESERVISTS. VIS A VIS!

<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="if(typeof(jsCall)=='function'){jsCall();}else{setTimeout('jsCall()',500);}" id="jsProxy" type="hidden"><input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="if(typeof(jsCall)=='function'){jsCall();}else{setTimeout('jsCall()',500);}" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">


Until today, still cannot figure out why FT needs to use their Singapore reverse to pay job credit to save their job.

Are they really that good?
 

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: $9000 INSULT. Singapore Males Should Be Allowed To PAY The SCUMs $9K Not To Serve

$9000 over 3 years is truely an insult !

Manokie might not understand .
 

Char_Azn

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: $9000 INSULT. Singapore Males Should Be Allowed To PAY The SCUMs $9K Not To Serve

$9000 over 3 years is truely an insult !

Manokie might not understand .

$9000 for 2yrs + 10 yrs reservist. Should be giving us something like 60K instead of 2 yrs wages
 

cheekenpie

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: $9000 INSULT. Singapore Males Should Be Allowed To PAY The SCUMs $9K Not To Serve

$9000 for 2yrs + 10 yrs reservist. Should be giving us something like 60K instead of 2 yrs wages

But WE ARE NOT getting it. only new nsmen right?
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: $9000 INSULT. Singapore Males Should Be Allowed To PAY The SCUMs $9K Not To Serve

Heard of peanuts and monkeys?
Shows what they really think of the locals?

What kind of people elect a govt so that foreigners can come in to steal their jobs,their children places in schools/tertiary educations and their houses?
 

Char_Azn

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: $9000 INSULT. Singapore Males Should Be Allowed To PAY The SCUMs $9K Not To Serve

But WE ARE NOT getting it. only new nsmen right?

Unless they suddenly want to change the meaning of NS men, it should include pple doing reservist. In fact by the normal definition of NS Men(which is Operationally Ready National Serviceman), Recruit doesn't even satisfy the criteria coz they are not operationally ready
 

RK85

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: $9000 INSULT. Singapore Males Should Be Allowed To PAY The SCUMs $9K Not To Serve

I think those who have already completed NS & reservist are included.


Unless they suddenly want to change the meaning of NS men, it should include pple doing reservist. In fact by the normal definition of NS Men(which is Operationally Ready National Serviceman), Recruit doesn't even satisfy the criteria coz they are not operationally ready
 
Top