https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...tain-claiming-17-ex-Isis-fighter-aged-42.html
If someone claims to be 14, but is 6’3” tall – as AJ is — that ought to have triggered an immediate physical exam, including blood tests to measure certain markers of age. An approximation, within two or three years, can be given. In the case of the person who declared himself to be 17 but turned out to be 42, such an examination should have been given before allowing him to enter the U.K. And if he was found to have lied about his age, that alone ought to have been sufficient grounds for immediate deportation back to his country of origin.
In 2022, a total of 1.1 migrants entered the U.K., and in 2021, 628,000 migrants entered. That’s a colossal increase. How many were Muslims? How many were claiming to be younger, even much younger, than they are? How many will be allowed to stay? And what does the government of Rishi Sunak plan to do about those who contribute to “the Great Replacement”?
Questions, questions. And we’ll wait right here for the answers.
Yes, AJ is no run-of-the-mill Muslim economic migrant, hoping to live life – all expenses paid – in big-hearted infidel Britain. No, AJ is an unusual economic migrant, hoping to live life — all expenses paid – in big-hearted infidel Britain who also happens to have been a member of the worst of all terrorist groups, the Islamic State (ISIS). We don’t know how many Yazidi girls he raped, or how many Yazidi men he murdered by slitting their throats or shooting them, but we do know that a great many ISIS fighters did such things. Only AJ knows, and he’s not telling.
Why should AJ have his legal expenses paid by the government? On what theory of demented benevolence should the British taxpayers be paying to help an ISIS fighter remain in the U.K., rather than have him deported to his country of origin, Iraq, where the local authorities can deal with him as they see fit? And the Iraqis are unlikely to be as gullible or soft-hearted as the British authorities have been with their 42-year-old 17-year-old, still living the life of Riley in a three-star hotel, while he waits for a decision on deportation.
There have been so many examples of these aging “minors” entering Great Britain with no one bothering to check their age until they are in the country, and it then becomes much harder, when they have lawyered up, to deport them. Right at the beginning, just at the point of entry into the country, they are allowed into the country, the authorities should check the physical evidence of their real ages. Their height and weight, the size of their wrist bones, the condition of their teeth, chest and pubic hair can all help. Blood tests can help determine what scientists call the “epigenetic clock,” which can get within plus or minus two or three years of someone’s actual age.
If someone claims to be 14, but is 6’3” tall – as AJ is — that ought to have triggered an immediate physical exam, including blood tests to measure certain markers of age. An approximation, within two or three years, can be given. In the case of the person who declared himself to be 17 but turned out to be 42, such an examination should have been given before allowing him to enter the U.K. And if he was found to have lied about his age, that alone ought to have been sufficient grounds for immediate deportation back to his country of origin.
Hmm. We are now dealing with the theatre of the absurd. Thick beard, receding hair, numerous tattoos – but still, he tells us he is 14, and who are we, the British border police, to contradict him? This is how a country comes undone.
His fingerprints, luckily, were on a European database, and from that the British authorities learned his identity and his real age. But what if his fingerprints had not ibeen n any database? Would he still be sitting in a three-star hotel, luxuriating at the expense of British taxpayers, tens of millions of whom have never, not once, stayed in a three-star hotel?
An interesting claim. What “human right” is being breached by deporting him to Iraq? He lied about his age. He lied about his past. Why shouldn’t he be lying as well about the “depression” he claims he is suffering from? He doesn’t sound depressed; being able to come up with these deceptions about his age and past that require a certain mental energy. But even if he is judged to be depressed, does that entitle him to remain in Great Britain? On what theory? If that becomes reason enough to let him stay, how many tens of thousands of would-be migrants will suddenly declare themselves “depressed” or even “incurable depressives”? And why does he claim that “only the NHS” (the National Health Service) can treat him? What does he – who has never lived in the U.K. – know about the NHS? And how can he be so sure that there are no psychiatrists capable of treating him in Iraq?
In 2022, a total of 1.1 migrants entered the U.K., and in 2021, 628,000 migrants entered. That’s a colossal increase. How many were Muslims? How many were claiming to be younger, even much younger, than they are? How many will be allowed to stay? And what does the government of Rishi Sunak plan to do about those who contribute to “the Great Replacement”?
Questions, questions. And we’ll wait right here for the answers.
