• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Ming Yi relieved from his duties

MarrickG

Alfrescian
Loyal
20101210.073046_20101210-mingyi.jpg


The Venerable Ming Yi has been relieved from his duties as the Foo Hai Chan Monastery's charity trustee and president.

The Straits Times reported that the 48-year-old monk will remain the Geylang temple's religious leader but with limited roles to religious duties.

An earlier news report on AsiaOne this week said news of a panel to judge the Venerable Ming Yi had been met with split views by the Buddhist community.

Some had questioned the Singapore Buddhist Federation's decision to form a committee to judge the Venerable Ming Yi.

The call for the panel came after the monk's temple threw an alleged $200,000 dinner in his honour at Pan Pacific Hotel on Nov 21.

Others noted that he had not apologised to the Buddhist community for his crimes.

Venerable Ming Yi was convicted for crimes related to falsifying accounts and misappropriating funds during his time as chief executive of Ren Ci Hospital in October last year.

He served about four months when he went to jail in May this year.

The Venerable Ming Yi had become to abbot of the Foo Hai Chan Monastery in 1992.

He was suspended from his executive roles by the Commissioner of Charities (COC) in 2008, when he was charged by the Commercial Affairs Department.

Anyone convicted of offences involving dishonesty or deception is automatically disqualified from being a charity trustee.

He is also not allowed to be a charity trustee or manage any charities in the future, the COC said.

If Venerable Ming Yi continues to hold administrative powers within the temple, a registered charity, he may be fined up to $5,000 or jailed for a year, or both.

With his removal from such duties, he will not have access to funds or be in charge of fund-raising.
 

IceLemonT

Alfrescian
Loyal
He has already served for jail term, why bring out the old stuffs again?

Sure lots of sour evil monks out there trying to cripple Ming Yi. ;P

Being a monk is a serious business right now.
 

denzuko1

Alfrescian
Loyal
He has already served for jail term, why bring out the old stuffs again?

Sure lots of sour evil monks out there trying to cripple Ming Yi. ;P

Being a monk is a serious business right now.

国有国法,家有家规. His action has seriously damaged the reputation of the Buddhist community especially the Sangha order, yet he has shown no repentent. If the buddhist community let him off, it will set example for future re-occurance.
 

IceLemonT

Alfrescian
Loyal
国有国法,家有家规. His action has seriously damaged the reputation of the Buddhist community especially the Sangha order, yet he has shown no repentent. If the buddhist community let him off, it will set example for future re-occurance.

Double penalty? No way.
 

captainxerox

Alfrescian
Loyal
i think his buddha jump over the wall days are over. time to eat plain porridge only. until he sets up his own temple with his followers backing him, and become a megatemple!
 

exSINgaporean

Alfrescian
Loyal
国有国法,家有家规. His action has seriously damaged the reputation of the Buddhist community especially the Sangha order, yet he has shown no repentent. If the buddhist community let him off, it will set example for future re-occurance.

"Geylang temple's religious leader"....that's the right place to put his service to....Geylang. Lots of whores will go to him for "cleansing".
 

drifter

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
国有国法,家有家规. His action has seriously damaged the reputation of the Buddhist community especially the Sangha order, yet he has shown no repentent. If the buddhist community let him off, it will set example for future re-occurance.

dont need him to damaged buddhist community ...religion itself already gone down the drain ...:rolleyes:
 

drifter

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
He has already served for jail term, why bring out the old stuffs again?

Sure lots of sour evil monks out there trying to cripple Ming Yi. ;P

Being a monk is a serious business right now.


not only being a monk can make money ...being a pestor also can earn big money ...:wink: all religions can make money in singapore , because most singaporean are stupid to use their brain , they just worship blindly . :rolleyes:
 
Z

Zombie

Guest
Others noted that he had not apologised to the Buddhist community for his crimes.

Buddhists believe in Karma and yet there are still someone thinking about "an apology to the Buddhist community".
This is more like politics.
 

denzuko1

Alfrescian
Loyal
Double penalty? No way.
In law, there is also a civil and a criminal suit. Even when you have gone through jail term under criminal suit, you can still face the civil suit from victims' family.

He really owes the Buddhist community an apology for his action which has seriously damaged the reputation of the sangha order. The very fact of his high profile publicity of his come back shows he still not aware of the consequences he has brought forth.
 
Z

Zombie

Guest
you obviously have little understanding on Buddhist beliefs of karma.

a good buddhist does not just judge others from a simple statement..
you obviously are not one either :biggrin:

btw.. a good buddhist does not even go around judging others...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

drifter

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
karma is just a religion word designed to control human actions and thinking ...
 
Top