• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Yankee Banks Suddenly Becum 'Profitable'. Con Game Pt 2?

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=452 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top width=452 colSpan=2>Published March 14, 2009
c.gif

</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top width=452 colSpan=2>BOA in the black, says CEO
Bank will ride out the recession without new help from US taxpayers, he adds

<TABLE class=storyLinks cellSpacing=4 cellPadding=1 width=136 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR class=font10><TD align=right width=20> </TD><TD>Email this article</TD></TR><TR class=font10><TD align=right width=20> </TD><TD>Print article </TD></TR><TR class=font10><TD align=right width=20> </TD><TD>Feedback</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
(Boston)
<TABLE class=picBoxL cellSpacing=2 width=100 align=left><TBODY><TR><TD> </TD></TR><TR class=caption><TD>MR LEWIS
Sees BOA making US$50 billion in 2009 before taxes, credit losses and writedowns, and says it would likely post a net profit </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>BANK of America Corp (BOA) has been profitable in January and February and should be able to ride out the recession without new help from US taxpayers, chief executive Kenneth Lewis said on Thursday.
Mr Lewis joined Citigroup's Vikram Pandit and JPMorgan Chase & Co's Jamie Dimon among CEOs to say their banks were in the black this year.
He also said his bank,the largest in the US, will make money for all of 2009, after reporting its first quarterly loss in 17 years for the October-to-December period.
Mr Lewis said the bank could make US$50 billion in 2009 before taxes, credit losses and writedowns, and would likely post a net profit, especially if businesses and consumers spend more. Early signs of recovery would likely come from housing, he predicted. 'I actually think the next six months is going to be, in a positive way, a gut-wrenching time,' Mr Lewis told an audience at the Chief Executive Officers Club of Boston. 'We're going to start seeing signs of improvement and, at some point, you have to pull the trigger on that investment or that expansion.'
Analysts, on average, expected BOA to lose three cents per share in the first quarter and turn a profit of 60 cents per share in 2009, according to Reuters Estimates. In afternoon trading, BOA shares soared US$1.04, or 21 per cent, at US$5.97, although they remain well below their US$14.08 level at the start of the year.
In his speech to the CEO club, Mr Lewis said it would be a 'nightmare' for US banks to be nationalised, wiping out shareholders and perhaps bondholders, and further damaging an economy that might begin to recover as soon as this year.
Mr Lewis also said he is confident the bank will pass a pending government 'stress test' and will not need more taxpayer money. It took US$45 billion from the US Treasury Department's Troubled Asset Relief Programme (TARP), including US$20 billion in a January bailout to help absorb Merrill.
Mr Lewis touched on two areas that have drawn fire from politicians and banking industry critics: executive pay and sponsorships of sports teams. He said it is wrong to require TARP recipients to cap pay of executives who are just below the top level and produce high amounts of revenue. He said they could be lured by foreign banks or boutique firms not subject to such limits.
He also said BOA's extensive sports marketing efforts generate US$3 of profit and US$10 of revenue for every dollar spent. BOA is the official bank of Major League Baseball and Nascar, and has the naming rights to the stadium for the Carolina Panthers football team in its hometown of Charlotte. -- Reuters

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=452 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top width=452 colSpan=2>Published March 14, 2009
c.gif

</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top width=452 colSpan=2>Citi doesn't need more govt capital: chairman

<TABLE class=storyLinks cellSpacing=4 cellPadding=1 width=136 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR class=font10><TD align=right width=20> </TD><TD>Email this article</TD></TR><TR class=font10><TD align=right width=20> </TD><TD>Print article </TD></TR><TR class=font10><TD align=right width=20> </TD><TD>Feedback</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
(Washington)
CITIGROUP does not need any more capital injections from the government, chairman Richard Parsons said on Thursday. He also expressed confidence that Citi would remain in private hands.
Asked in an interview with Reuters whether Citigroup needed more government capital injections, Mr Parsons replied: 'No, I think actually, particularly with the latest conversion ... Citi is actually one of the better capitalised banks in the world.'
Mr Parsons was speaking on the sidelines of a Business Roundtable event where United States President Barack Obama addressed business executives.
The Citigroup leader also brushed aside any prospect of the US government nationalising the bank. 'I don't think the administration is heading in that direction,' Mr Parsons noted. 'But I have a lot of confidence in the future viability and strength of a privately held Citi.'
The Obama administration and regulators, including Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke, have said they do not want the government to take full control of the nation's banks.
<SCRIPT language=javascript> <!-- // Check for Mac. var strAgent; var blnMac; strAgent = navigator.userAgent; strAgent.indexOf('Mac') > 0 ? blnMac = true:blnMac = false; if (blnMac == true) { document.write('
'); } //--> </SCRIPT><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=4 width=300 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top align=middle>
greenline.gif

adgrey.gif

<!-- AdSpace --><IFRAME marginWidth=0 marginHeight=0 src="http://ads.asia1.com.sg/html.ng/site=tbto&sec=btointhenews&cat1=bnews&cat2=btointhenewsart&size=300X250" frameBorder=0 width=300 scrolling=no height=250 bordercolor="#000000"><script language='JavaScript1.1' src='http://ads.asia1.com.sg/js.ng/Params.richmedia=yes&site=tbto&sec=btointhenews&cat1=bnews&cat2=btointhenewsart&size=300X250'></script><noscript> </noscript></IFRAME><!-- /AdSpace-->
greenline.gif
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>Citi's shares on Thursday closed 13 cents higher, or 8.4 per cent, to US$1.67 on the New York Stock Exchange. For the first time, Citi shares fell below US$1 on March 5.
The US government said last month it would boost its equity stake in Citigroup to as much as 36 per cent through the conversion of up to US$25 billion in preferred shares to common stock.
In total, Citi has received US$45 billion of taxpayer-funded capital since October. This marked the third attempt by the US authorities to prop up Citigroup in the past five months.
Earlier this week Citi said it was profitable in the first two months of 2009 and is confident about its capital strength, easing concerns about the bank's survival prospects.
As a precautionary measure US regulators recently began work on a contingency plan to stabilise Citigroup if problems mounted, but no imminent rescue was planned, a person familiar with the planning said on Tuesday. Citi and other banks are waiting for the US government to announce a plan to absorb soured assets banks are holding on their balance sheets. -- Reuters

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Top