• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

WSJ: GIC Screwed On CitiGroup Investment

sgnewsalte

Alfrescian
Loyal
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr></tr><tr><td height="8">
</td></tr> <tr><td class="msgtxt">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123538893059147345.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

By COSTAS PARIS and NISHA GOPALAN


SINGAPORE -- Talks over a bigger U.S. government stake in Citigroup Inc. could put Singapore's sovereign wealth fund in the difficult position of having to decide whether to convert its beaten-down Citi stake into common stock and wind up owning more of the troubled bank than it might want.

Elsewhere in Asia, banking regulators will likely look closely at the impact of a partial nationalization on banking units partly or wholly owned by Citigroup.

And for Citi units in Asia, some of which were recently recapitalized by the parent company, the question will be whether those fresh funds will now flow back to the U.S. as the cash-strapped lender moves to pare back its presence overseas.

Citing people familiar with the matter, The Wall Street Journal reported early Monday that Citigroup is in talks with U.S. federal officials about converting a substantial chunk of the government's $45 billion in preferred shares into common stock. If the plan goes ahead, the government could wind up holding as much as 40% of Citigroup's common stock, although bank executives hope the stake will be closer to 25%, these people said.

The Journal reported that Citigroup officials also hope to persuade such private investors as the Government of Singapore Investment Corp., Abu Dhabi Investment Authority and Kuwait Investment Authority to follow the U.S. government's lead in converting some of their stakes into common stock. That would further bolster an increasingly pivotal measure of banks' capital known as tangible common equity.

For Singapore's GIC, which earns an annual coupon of 7% on its preferred stock, converting its holding into common stock doesn't remove the risk of being diluted or wiped out if Citigroup needs another capital injection or is nationalized by the U.S. government.


GIC has no current plans to convert the preferred shares it owns in Citigroup Inc. into common stock, two people familiar with the situation said Monday.

"If GIC is to convert into common stock, the deal must be sweetened quite a lot. They want to make sure that their return will be equal or above the coupon," one of these people said.

GIC and Citigroup both declined to comment.

In January 2008, GIC invested $6.88 billion in convertible preferred securities of Citigroup, which at the time would have given it a 4% stake in the bank if converted to common stock. According to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing late last month, GIC now owns a beneficial 5.3% stake, or 303.8 million shares, in Citigroup. These include preferred shares that can be converted into 261.1 million common shares. Based on Citi's $1.95 closing price Friday, the stake is worth $592.4 million.

Citi May Scale Down Asian Ops If Nationalized


Citigroup's ability to support its offshore businesses could be curtailed by a bigger U.S. government stake in the bank. Indeed, analysts fully expect a largely U.S.-owned Citi would end up selling foreign units, including some Asian operations.

One investment banker says Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC's recent experience after the U.K. government took a 57% stake offers clues to what might happen at Citigroup.

The Wall Street Journal, citing people familiar with the matter, reported Friday that RBS hired Morgan Stanley to explore the sale of Asian retail and commercial operations and Australian operations it acquired when it bought part of ABN Amro Holding NV in 2007.

In Citi's case, "of course, it will depend on what is seen as core and non-core as a government-owned bank," the banker said.

In Japan, Citigroup is already seeking to unload Nikko Cordial Securities Inc., one of the country's top brokerages, after spending roughly ¥1.5 trillion in January 2008 to make it a wholly owned subsidiary.

In December, Citigroup injected $800 million into Citibank Korea Inc. -- the largest Citigroup subsidiary in Asia-Pacific in terms of capital and assets -- in order to raise its capital base. The move was spurred by South Korea's banking regulator. At the time, Citi said it was the only regional unit to receive a capital injection and that the funds didn't come from the U.S. Treasury Department's Troubled Asset Relief Program.

Nationalized banks tend to focus on domestic markets, and if the U.S.'s stake in Citi increases, the bank's lending to foreign companies could shrink, said Keith Pogson, partner, global financial services, Ernst & Young.

Mr. Pogson said he's increasingly advising corporate clients "to ensure that they include a locally domiciled bank in their panel of banks from which they finance themselves."

Moderate Reaction From Markets


News of the Citi-U.S. talks briefly supported Asian stock markets on Monday, with some bourses turning higher or coming off their early session lows. U.S. stock futures moved up 1.0% in screen trade.

"After this Wall Street Journal report the market has bounced, indicating a bit of short-covering," said Patersons Securities' Sydney retail head Chris Blair. "It is the uncertainty that the market (has been) selling. If the U.S.
government is looking at a 40% stake, although not largely positive, the market will have that certainty and reel in some short positions."

The Nikkei 225 ended down 0.5%, though off its lows, and Australian shares closed 1.5% lower. South Korea's Kospi Composite ended up 3.2% and Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index was up 3.9%.

Korean banks gained; KB Financial added 2.6% and Hana Financial rose 6.3%.

The Citigroup report boosted appetite for risk in the currency market. The euro gained sharply against both the yen and U.S. dollar. There were also gains for higher-yielding, and thus riskier, currencies like the Australian dollar and the New Zealand dollar rising. U.S. Treasury prices slipped.

"Always this kind of news is pressure on the Treasury market," said Kazuaki Oh'e, executive director of debt capital markets at CIBC World Markets in Tokyo. Investors had piled into Treasurys on Friday as fears mounted about the future of Citigroup and Bank of America, and "now we're seeing an unwinding of that move."
<cite class="tagline">
—Jin-Young Yook and Rosalind Mathieson contributed to this story.</cite></td></tr></tbody></table>
 

sgnewsalte

Alfrescian
Loyal
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr><td height="8">
</td></tr> <tr><td class="msgtxt">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/u-s-to-citi-shareholders-drop-dead/

U.S. to Citi shareholders: Drop dead!


Posted Feb 23rd 2009 9:15AM by Peter Cohan
Filed under: Citigroup Inc. (C), Politics, Financial Crisis

It has become popular in the last year to blame common shareholders for the poor judgment of the executives who are supposed to boost corporate profits. The blame rests with the board of directors whose legal responsibility is to represent the interests of common shareholders and to take action if management is not acting in their best interests.

Now, after denying that it plans to nationalize banks, the U.S. is reportedly in discussions with Citigroup (NYSE: C) to convert its $45 billion in preferred shares -- which represents a 7.8% share -- into a 40% stake in Citi common. In the process of making this conversion, Citi will issue new common shares which will further dilute Citi shareholders. Why is this happening? Because over the next few weeks, the U.S. is going to apply stress tests, which calculate the effect of a crushing recession on the balance sheets of the top 20 banks.

And by taking a 40% stake, the U.S. can help Citi increase the odds of passing that test. How so? The government's preferred shares are treated as debt for accounting purposes and by converting those shares to common, Citi can reduce its debt and increase its tangible common equity. The U.S. thinks this boost in tangible common equity will give Citi the balance sheet strength it needs to pass the stress test.

This move also puts pressure on the sovereign wealth funds (SWF) that bought Citi preferred. Should they also convert their holdings to common? These SWF investors include the Government of Singapore Investment Corp. (GIC), Abu Dhabi Investment Authority and Kuwait Investment Authority. But if GIC's $6.9 billion stake is converted into 4% of Citi common, it will give up a 7% yield on the preferred and still face the risk of dilution by the U.S.
And if the SWFs do convert, it will mean more bad news for Citi common shareholders.

Let's be real for a second. The U.S. is trying to keep Citi from a bankruptcy filing. The idea is that Citi is too big to fail. But isn't there some way to unwind Citi's obligations in an orderly way so that a bankruptcy doesn't roil the markets? Does the world really have enough capital to cover all of Citi's potential losses and those of the other large banks that are not in shape to pass the stress test? How much good money will we continue to throw after bad before we say that enough is enough?

Meanwhile, common shareholders are bearing the cost of the failures of the boards and executives who got these banks into such a perilous state. That means anyone who invested their 200.5-K in stocks by believing the idea that stocks for the long-run are the best way to go will be lucky if they can keep a job long enough to make up for the losses.

Unfortunately, the common shareholders are wiped out whether the government takes over the banks or lets them file for bankruptcy. This means that capitalism is in trouble over the long-run if people have memories of what is happening today. How so? Capitalism depends on the willingness of people to finance growth by buying common stock, but we're now seeing why common stock is a terrible investment.

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.





</td></tr></tbody></table>
 

mscitw

Alfrescian
Loyal
Old Autocrat always boast his experience and credentials make him immune from silly mistake.

The mistake started when His Hignness ignored the signs and put Her daughter-in-law to helm Temasek. Blood is thicker than water.

That is precisely why WKS is forgiven after the Mas Scandal. Another common-law relation in need of protection after an inept showing.

Woe woe woe Peasantpore.
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr><td height="8">
</td></tr> <tr><td class="msgtxt">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/u-s-to-citi-shareholders-drop-dead/

U.S. to Citi shareholders: Drop dead!



This move also puts pressure on the sovereign wealth funds (SWF) that bought Citi preferred. Should they also convert their holdings to common? These SWF investors include the Government of Singapore Investment Corp. (GIC), Abu Dhabi Investment Authority and Kuwait Investment Authority. But if GIC's $6.9 billion stake is converted into 4% of Citi common, it will give up a 7% yield on the preferred and still face the risk of dilution by the U.S.
And if the SWFs do convert, it will mean more bad news for Citi common shareholders.


Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

</td></tr></tbody></table>

I have already given my CPF monies, I have nothing more to give!:confused:

Shame on the 'sick, sick.sick' (66.6%), they get fooled everytime!:eek:
 

Leckmichamarsch

Alfrescian
Loyal
At one time Prince Alawee of Saudi Arabia was major shareholder.
How come he is no in the picture? Did the desert rat smelt a rat n got out on time???
 

red amoeba

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
i think we can write off our involvement in Citibank liao...it won't be long before you see the Citibank ezylink card thingy advertisement and billboards disappearing from MRT stations.

Can some MPs please raise this point in the next parliment to demand some explanations & implications?
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This but shows that the Familee and its running dogs are no more than FOOLISH GANGSTERS who are only good at bullying the citizens and extorting money from them in their own country while INEPT and COMPLETELY CLUELESS in the international arena.

T-Shirt-Join-the-Revolution-746767.jpg
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Old Autocrat always boast his experience and credentials make him immune from silly mistake.

The mistake started when His Hignness ignored the signs and put Her daughter-in-law to helm Temasek. Blood is thicker than water.

That is precisely why WKS is forgiven after the Mas Scandal. Another common-law relation in need of protection after an inept showing.

Woe woe woe Peasantpore.

harry Lee and the PAP elite always claim the need for secrecy as an excuse not to divulge info on GIC and Temasek investments. Well, now all their investments like CITIgroup, Merrill, Shincorp, etc. are exposed for the whole world to see and analyse. Still want to hide what? Chee bye Lee should just open the books and let every one see the horror story. At least people will say he had guts to do that, as opposed to hiding behind the skirt of his dyke daughter in law Ho Jinx.
 

2lanu

Alfrescian
Loyal
During boom time, they can claim whatever credit on it. But suprprisely, when market falls, nobody is coming up to take the blame. I call this hypocrite! :oIo:
 
Top