• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Woman takes boyfriend to tribunal after he fails to take her to the airport

cat

Stupidman
Loyal
Woman takes boyfriend to tribunal after he fails to take her to the airport

Sam Smith
Updated June 21, 2024 — 4.21pm

A woman took her boyfriend to New Zealand’s Disputes Tribunal after he failed to take her to the airport, causing her to miss a flight to a concert she had planned to attend.

The woman involved had arranged to be picked up by the man, who she was in a relationship with, but he never arrived to collect her.

As a result, she missed her flight and had to travel the following day.

It was also arranged that he was to stay at her house while she was away and look after her dogs, which he did not do.

The details of the case were released on Thursday, with the names of the couple redacted.

The woman lodged a claim with the tribunal, which said that, in her view, the agreement for a ride to the airport constituted a legally binding agreement.

She said she incurred costs to travel the following day, the cost of a shuttle to the airport and the cost to put her dogs into a kennel.

The woman said she ended up paying for the fare and claimed the man would reimburse her.

She added the man, whom she had been in a relationship with for over six years, entered into a verbal contract with her that he would take her to the airport and stay in her house while she was away.

Tribunal referee Krysia Cowi said in a statement, “partners, friends and colleagues make social arrangements, but it is unlikely they can be legally enforced unless the parties perform some act that demonstrates an intention that they will be bound by their promises”.

“When friends fail to keep their promises, the other person may suffer a financial consequence but it may be that they cannot be compensated for that loss,” she said.

Ultimately, Cowie decided that although a promise was made, it fell short of being a contract, with the promises exchanged as a normal give and take in a relationship.

As a result, Cowie dismissed the women’s claims.

The couple have now separated.
 
Top