• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Will Microsoft get rid of Ballmer?

GoFlyKiteNow

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
2,605
Points
0
Will Microsoft get rid of Ballmer?
Comment Newsweek conjectures it will
By Ed Berridge

RECENTLY the US news magazine Newsweek predicted that next year shy and retiring Microsoft CEO Steve "there's a kind of hush" Ballmer will be handed his P45 and pink slip.

Newsweek's basis for its prediction is its view that Ballmer has not delivered. Since Bill Gates departed from the Vole to save Africans from all sorts of medical conditions, Microsoft has stumbled and lost much of its former teflon-coated image.

A blog claims that the Volish board will finally push out Steve Ballmer from the CEO position next year, just as soon as one of them is brave enough to tell him.

In the run up to Christmas, Ballmer's fingerprints have been seen on the Vole's biggest mis-steps in the last ten years.

Windows Vista was Microsoft's biggest failure in the company's history, and the firm's stock is now worth only half what it once was. Ballmer has also managed to stand still while some of the greatest tech booms sailed over his head. Internet search, mp3 players, online music - you name it, Steve missed it.

Perhaps the biggest problem was that Ballmer completely missed the mobile and netbook operating systems bandwagon and saw the Vole's Windows Mobile fall like a stone, right out of the mobile market.

Ballmer did not see that Apple and Google were moving in on the Vole's mobile territory. Microsoft had always sold its mobile operating system to businesses on the basis that it synced well with its server software. Now even businesses are starting to think that there is more to life than that.

Yet to be fair to Steve he had jumped into the hotseat just as the economy tanked and Gates did have a hand in many of the directions that Microsoft has taken over the last ten years.

Steve might well have to pull some rabbits out of his hat quite soon to survive 2010.

But Newsweek hasn't liked Steve much for a while. In October it said that Steve was not the man that Gates was. When he became CEO, everyone was frightened of the Vole but lately it's been seen as "being nice".

"Microsoft was still the meanest, mightiest tech company in the world, a juggernaut that bullied friends and foes alike and which possessed an operating-system franchise that was practically a license to print money. Techies likened Microsoft to the Borg on Star Trek, the evil collective that insatiably assimilates everything around it, with the slogan, 'Resistance is futile.'", Newsweek said.

"Now, instead of being scary, Microsoft has become a bit of a joke," it said. This is ironic as Steve's own reputation is one of chair tossing enthusiasm. But we guess there is more to being a CEO of a major software company than shouting at people.

http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1566790/will-microsoft-rid-ballmer
 
Microsoft is back to being cut down to normal. I hope the governments worldwide start to switch to freeoffice as well
 
That guy seems to be a jerk.

Read somewhere that he parks his Ferrari in an unauthorised place because its more convenient.

He's always underestimated the competition such as the Apple Iphone which latter turn out to be big successes :)

This kind of leader you can also find in the PAP :rolleyes:
 
I think their problem comes from MS's size and fact that it has a lucrative cash cow - MS Windows and Office.

MS size has mired the company in antitrust issues

Cashcow - MS Windows.

Note that for 2009 MS Net Income was a cool US$14.5B bs Google's $4B (Apple has NI of about $5.5B and oracle has about NI of $6B (Q2 2009 was 1.5B)). So MS nets more than Apple, Google and Oracle combined

So don't count them out just yet - at least not with this type of earnings!
 
Consumers confidence has been badly shaken long before Steve Ballmer's time.

I am holding onto my XP's without even wanting to test drive Vista or Window 7. Steve Ballmer's failure are largely due to him not be able to get consumers confidence back.
 
Much of that income is spent on legal fees fighting anti-trust laws on 2 continents. There is a whole list outstanding cases pending.


I think their problem comes from MS's size and fact that it has a lucrative cash cow - MS Windows and Office.

MS size has mired the company in antitrust issues

Cashcow - MS Windows.

Note that for 2009 MS Net Income was a cool US$14.5B bs Google's $4B (Apple has NI of about $5.5B and oracle has about NI of $6B (Q2 2009 was 1.5B)). So MS nets more than Apple, Google and Oracle combined

So don't count them out just yet - at least not with this type of earnings!
 
M$ is getting irrelevant by the day. True, they are still "big" but their dominance on the OS/Office market are coming to an end. The recent IE zero-day exploits has several government issuing warnings not to use IE anymore. This is hardly conceivable even 5 years ago. Soon, you'll get governments issuing advisory on not using the OS/Office all together.
 
That is net income which means legal costs have been factored in. It is also net of any extraordinary items. Few realize just how profitable MS is. Also if you make $14.5B a year in net income you can afford to be complacent.



Much of that income is spent on legal fees fighting anti-trust laws on 2 continents. There is a whole list outstanding cases pending.
 
You are right, my mistake.
That is net income which means legal costs have been factored in. It is also net of any extraordinary items. Few realize just how profitable MS is. Also if you make $14.5B a year in net income you can afford to be complacent.
 
I think where they make the $$$ is in the corp world. Corps change their computers every 2 years. especially with notebooks that do not last. So every 2 years must buy new windows lic. Corps do not care because they can write this off.

Just imagine how many office workers we have in Singapore. If there were 1 million that is 1 million computers or 1 million licenses every 2 years. many of these workers also have PC at home. The corp world is where the big $$$ comes from. We do not see it buy each time we buy a new notebook - money goes to MS. How many Singapore offices pay $$$ to Google?

So if you own this gold mine your mind is how to defend 24/7. Google could very well destroy this goldmine with cloud computing etc. But MS is not going down without a fight and $14B a year in NI means a heck of a fight.

Now that Google is leaving China, that might present an opening for MS to try and build presence. They could very well buy baidu (mkt cap only $16B) and become numero uno in China (but their concerns would again be with antitrust) or build from scratch. China is a huge potential market and its large size, good infrastructure, growing affluence makes its ideal fo e-commerce activities.



Consumers confidence has been badly shaken long before Steve Ballmer's time.

I am holding onto my XP's without even wanting to test drive Vista or Window 7. Steve Ballmer's failure are largely due to him not be able to get consumers confidence back.
 
Back
Top