• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat WHY SAME CRIME BUT DIFFERENT PUNISHMENT? MATA MATA SLEEPING?

stingray

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Mar 3, 2016
Messages
396
Points
43
The grandma was charged for abusing her maids. Her offence? Ordering three maids to slap one another and also pouring water over themselves. The prosecutor asked for custodial sentence for causing hurt even though none of the maids suffered physical injuries.

In another case, one Malay scumbag kicked the girl and her dog for no apparent reasons and the mata mata told the girl and the scumbag to resolve the matter themselves. The girl got bruises from the attack but mata mata unwilling to press charges against the scumbag for causing hurt.

Grandma's crime, no injuries but prosecuted. Scumbag's crime, injuries inflicted but not prosecuted.

Are the paps serious about enforcing the laws in SG or is it all wayang wayang to show the world SG protects all FS?
 
The grandma was charged for abusing her maids. Her offence? Ordering three maids to slap one another and also pouring water over themselves. The prosecutor asked for custodial sentence for causing hurt even though none of the maids suffered physical injuries.

In another case, one Malay scumbag kicked the girl and her dog for no apparent reasons and the mata mata told the girl and the scumbag to resolve the matter themselves. The girl got bruises from the attack but mata mata unwilling to press charges against the scumbag for causing hurt.

Grandma's crime, no injuries but prosecuted. Scumbag's crime, injuries inflicted but not prosecuted.

Are the paps serious about enforcing the laws in SG or is it all wayang wayang to show the world SG protects all FS?
Not sure the details but based on your post and applying the rule of thumb of sinkie always gets harsher punishment law the answer rook rike the first case involved a foreign worker KNN
 
The grandma was charged for abusing her maids. Her offence? Ordering three maids to slap one another and also pouring water over themselves. The prosecutor asked for custodial sentence for causing hurt even though none of the maids suffered physical injuries.

In another case, one Malay scumbag kicked the girl and her dog for no apparent reasons and the mata mata told the girl and the scumbag to resolve the matter themselves. The girl got bruises from the attack but mata mata unwilling to press charges against the scumbag for causing hurt.

Grandma's crime, no injuries but prosecuted. Scumbag's crime, injuries inflicted but not prosecuted.

Are the paps serious about enforcing the laws in SG or is it all wayang wayang to show the world SG protects all FS?
The mata scared to apprehend a fierce "mat". But old lady can be handled easily,
 
because the muscular mat will require more than 69 poodles to make an arrest as it already requires 6.9 poodles to pin down a scrawny man.
1584079816944.png
 
You must know that Sinkies are 3rd class in Sinkieland and should not expect mata mata to help you.
 
Last edited:
The grandma was charged for abusing her maids. Her offence? Ordering three maids to slap one another and also pouring water over themselves. The prosecutor asked for custodial sentence for causing hurt even though none of the maids suffered physical injuries.

In another case, one Malay scumbag kicked the girl and her dog for no apparent reasons and the mata mata told the girl and the scumbag to resolve the matter themselves. The girl got bruises from the attack but mata mata unwilling to press charges against the scumbag for causing hurt.

Grandma's crime, no injuries but prosecuted. Scumbag's crime, injuries inflicted but not prosecuted.

Are the paps serious about enforcing the laws in SG or is it all wayang wayang to show the world SG protects all FS?

I have been following the sentencing cases for some time. A law is a law, we have to respect the law of the land, but it is the judges interpretation of sentencing, we really do not know, unless, we are os free to read up the judges summation of the case. But mostly it looks like, depend on the judge, if have a good bfast or got a good 'lay' last night... ha ha ha & foreigners are given some leniency over locals. But who knows, 'the law, is the law, is for the protection of the people.

Maybe some law guru can explain?


 
Back
Top