• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Why PMDs should be banned : Yahoo Poll

glockman

Old Fart
Asset
Joined
Sep 11, 2010
Messages
37,607
Points
113
https://sg.yahoo.com/poll/3ac8f800-e57e-11e9-852c-15b375d8a48f

3 days left 943 votes

The calls for tighter regulation over personal mobility devices (PMDs) like e-scooters and e-bikes is growing amid a spate of serious injuries and deaths on Singapore's roads and pedestrian footpaths. How strongly do you think PMDs should be regulated?

    • HDB PMD ban: Residents hope for strict enforcement

    • 65-year-old woman involved in e-scooter accident dies
sbf11.jpg
 
[Reserve my space here before Pro PMD Spammer posts his multiple long posts supporking PMDs] :biggrin:
 
Actually cars are the ones that should be banned. They have no place in congested cities.

PMDs are the future. There is no turning back the tide.
 
Lately, it seems he's not that vigorous with his defence of PMDs. Perhaps he finally came to his senses. :whistling::biggrin:

I moved my efforts to sg road vigilante channel for a more targeted campaign.

That channel shows just how dangerous cars, trucks and buses are and why their use should be severely restricted.
 
https://www.governmenteuropa.eu/benefits-of-e-scooters-outlined/91814/

Benefits of e-scooters outlined in new study
10th January 2019
benefits of e-scooters

Ujet and SustainAbility have published a study detailing how Europe should open up its consideration of the benefits of e-scooters.

The study highlighted an array of benefits of e-scooters, including their potential as a cost-effective and rapidly scalable solution to social, environmental and economic challenges in cities. The study also outlines that more action is needed to incentivise a switch at scale from conventional vehicles.

The research, which was commissioned by global tech company Ujet and undertaken by consultancy and think tank SustainAbility, finds that the potential benefits of e-scooters will only be realised by cities if there is a rapid and deep transformation of private city vehicle fleets, triggered by a change in policy.

While emissions from other major economic sectors have fallen in recent decades, impacts from mobility have increased. Mobility emissions are currently responsible for roughly 23 per cent of global CO2 emissions and are a key contributor to air pollution in our cities. Electric vehicles (EVs) are increasingly considered the most viable solution to eliminate mobility emissions and improve air quality. The report emphasises the benefits of e-scooters and other EVs, noting that replacing 80 per cent of vehicles on the road with EVs by 2050 would cut emissions of NOx, PM, and SO2 by more than 80 per cent in comparison with 2010 levels.

It also demonstrates that being inactive is not an option. At present, nine out of 10 people worldwide breathe polluted air. This causes 556,000 premature deaths in Europe attributable to ambient air and household pollution.

In Barcelona alone, it is estimated that 3,500 premature deaths are related to air pollution. Beyond that, congestion in cities costs the European economy over one per cent of its GDP every year. Paris is the third most congested city in Europe with traffic increasing travel time by around 40 minutes each day and with a total cost of €9.9 billion per year.

Shifts towards electric cars and buses are at the centre of advocacy and discussions, however, cost-effectiveness and scalability present barriers to successful EV adoption. The report finds the spatial benefits of e-scooters, including minimal infrastructure and storage requirements, make them an easily scalable clean mobility option. A total of 10 e-scooters can be parked in every car parking spot, and a 10 per cent switch from cars to e-scooters would reduce congestion by 40 per cent – helping to tackle the largest source of air pollution.

Hugues Despres, CEO, Ujet International, says: “Existing urban mobility solutions can’t keep up with the growth of our cities and are not addressing the challenges of increasing congestion and pollution. The only answer is to redefine urban mobility by making a product that is more relevant to the problem, and then to scale that new solution at pace. It is a question of making urban transport truly fit for the future. Our mission is to enable individuals to change their relationship with the cities they inhabit, and we are excited to work with cities to improve mobility, convenience and sustainability.”

Alexandra Brill, manager at SustainAbility, adds: “Rapid rates of urbanisation driven by population growth means that cities will increasingly become the nexus at which stresses on environment, health and wellbeing meet. In the context of these issues, electric vehicles have a significant role to play in addressing urban mobility challenges, yet the conversation too often focuses narrowly on cars – excluding other low-impact technologies.

“Our research suggests that e-scooters present an effective and scalable solution not only to the challenges of pollution but also congestion in our cities. We believe more research and discussion on the potential benefits of e-scooters is needed to address existing knowledge gaps; and policy incentives should be expanded to be inclusive of not only electric cars but also e-scooters and other low-impact options.”

SustainAbility ranked nine modes of urban transport against its framework for sustainable mobility, finding that e-scooters offer maximum social and environmental benefits to cities. Benchmarks used to rank different solutions – which include cars, buses, trains, scooters and bikes – covered sustainability, inclusivity, efficiency and safety. Of a total 39 points available, the benefits of e-scooters scored 37, while e-cars scored 28 points, and conventional scooters scored 26 points.

City authorities and governments are already exploring options for more sustainable mobility. Initiatives identified around the world include vehicle-sharing schemes, traffic management systems and improved integration of different mobility modes. In 2017, 12 cities, including Milan, Paris and Barcelona, signed the C40 Fossil-Fuel-Free Streets Declaration, pledging to procure only zero-emission buses from 2025 and to ensure a major area of their city is zero emission by 2030. While many EU, national and municipal policy measures focus on electric cars and public transport, more initiatives that actively promote the benefits of e-scooters in cities are needed.
Governments and cities have powerful policy tools available to them to incentivise even greater change. Examples cited in the study include:
  • Provision of grants and tax incentives that encourage purchasing of e-scooters;
  • Progressive phase out of conventional scooters by 2040;
  • Allocation of free parking spaces for e-scooters;
  • E-scooter roll out targets to focus city efforts for accelerated e-scooter adoption;
  • Development of dedicated road infrastructure for e-scooters; and
  • Integration of individual EVs into urban mobility systems to encourage eco-friendly behaviour (for example introduction of reduced tariffs for e-scooter users on public transport).
If we are to meet our 2°C climate targets under the Paris Agreement, emissions strategies must seek to implement scalable low and zero carbon mobility solutions at pace.
  • Research from Ujet and SustainAbility finds policy incentives at city, national and EU-levels should be expanded beyond electric cars to highlight the benefits of e-scooters and other low-impact transport options to improve urban living conditions and meet climate targets.
  • Transport represents 23 per cent of global CO2 emissions, whilst also being a source of other dangerous emissions like NOx, particulate matter, and SO2.
  • 80 per cent of city dwellers are exposed to air quality levels that exceed World Health Organisation limits and ultimately leads to dramatic impacts on health and quality of life.
 
I always thought you are a non believer of Climate Change. Why the sudden turnaround citing environmental benefits of PMDs? :eek: :biggrin:

I don't believe in this man made climate change shit. The environmental benefits have nothing to do with CO2. It's all about carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, formaldehyde, benzene and soot,

It's also about the destruction of natural habit to build roads and car parks. The whole of SG is pretty much one huge parking lot despite the COE scheme.
 
I don't believe in this man made climate change shit. The environmental benefits have nothing to do with CO2. It's all about carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, formaldehyde, benzene and soot,

It's also about the destruction of natural habit to build roads and car parks. The whole of SG is pretty much one huge parking lot despite the COE scheme.
Had you been a practising lawyer, I would have hired you to be my counsel, yonks ago. Your arguments have always been innovative and sounding legit. :D
 
Actually cars are the ones that should be banned. They have no place in congested cities.

PMDs are the future. There is no turning back the tide.
I hate to admit it but yes PMDs are here to stay. The bad rep that PMDs are getting here is the utterly poor regulation by the govt to protect pedestrians. The govt lacks foresight and is very slow to act. I agree with the article you posted on the benefits of PMDs that there needs to have been a "development of dedicated road infrastructure for e-scooters". But we have these monkeys zipping around on walkways.
 
Bicycle the best! Pollu
I hate to admit it but yes PMDs are here to stay. The bad rep that PMDs are getting here is the utterly poor regulation by the govt to protect pedestrians. The govt lacks foresight and is very slow to act. I agree with the article you posted on the benefits of PMDs that there needs to have been a "development of dedicated road infrastructure for e-scooters". But we have these monkeys zipping around on walkways.

Sinkies are kiasi n kiasu lot. No amt of education can chg their sinkie attitude
 
SINGAPORE — Two in five Singaporeans call for a complete ban on personal mobility devices (PMDs) following the recent spate of related accidents, a survey has found.

Findings released on Tuesday (8 October) from a study by UK-based research firm YouGov showed those who disagree with a ban and those who are undecided were almost split evenly at 29 per cent and 30 per cent, respectively.

The study found that older Singaporeans, aged 55 and above, reported being more averse to PMDs than younger Singaporeans aged 18 to 24: half of older Singaporeans want PMDs banned, in contrast with over a quarter of younger Singaporeans.

Two-thirds of Singaporeans think that PMDs should be restricted to people with mobility issues.


70e6f4c0-e9b4-11e9-b17e-ed73ed8342bd


‘Dangerous’ device

The study also found that three in five Singaporeans classify PMDs as “dangerous”, with close to half ranking the device as the most dangerous mode of transport among options presented in the survey.

49 per cent of respondents ranked it as the most dangerous mode of transport, ahead of cars in second place at 19 per cent.

11 per cent found motorbikes dangerous, followed by electric bicycles (9 per cent), skateboard (7 per cent), kick scooters (3 per cent) and pedal bicycles (2 per cent).

The majority (73 per cent) of respondents agree that PMDs should be allowed on specified lanes, with 19 per cent each stating that the devices should be on footpaths or public roads, while 16 per cent think they should not be allowed anywhere
.

According to findings, only one in 20 currently owns a PMD, with men three times more likely than women to own one.

“PMDs are a controversial topic at the moment, and something that clearly has Singaporeans divided. Whether an altogether ban or restrictions placed on use, many people want something to be done about PMDs – which will hopefully prevent fatalities happening again in future,” said Jake Gammon, Head of Omnibus APAC at YouGov Omnibus.

The survey polled 1,116 Singaporeans via YouGov’s Omnibus online research service from 3 to 4 October, a week after a 65-year-old cyclist, Ong Bee Eng, succumbed to her injuries following a collision with an e-scooter. Authorities later announced that the PMD was non-compliant.

Ong’s death led to a surge in signatories for a six-month-old petition on Change.org calling for the ban of PMDs and electric bicycles. The number of signatures surged to over 67,600 as of Tuesday evening, from about 21,000, after her death was reported on 25 September.

Footpath safety
On Monday, Janil Puthucheary, Senior Minister of State for Transport, said in Parliament that the government may have “no choice” but to ban the usage of such devices in Singapore, if the behaviour of PMD users does not improve.

PMDs, as well as bicycles or power-assisted bicycles, were banned from void decks and all common areas of 15 housing estates last month.

We need footpaths to be safe for pedestrians again,” Dr Janil said, adding that the government will be revisiting its plans on public path safety to see where it needs to rethink its approach and possibly introduce new measures. He had asked for “one or two months” for his ministry to conduct a thorough review on the matter.

A total of 228 accidents involving PMDs on public paths were reported in 2017 and 2018. Of these accidents, 196 cases involved injuries.

Separately, on Monday, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) announced that it will be scheduling mandatory inspections for UL2272-certified e-scooters registered before 1 April 2020 at “no cost to existing owners”.

From 1 April next year, all new e-scooters will have to pass the inspection before they can be registered for use on public paths.

All non-UL2272-certified e-scooters will be automatically deregistered from 1 July 2020,
which is the deadline for mandatory UL2272 compliance for e-scooters used on public paths.

E-scooters that are UL2272-certified but do not comply with the weight, width and speed requirements during inspection will also have their registration cancelled by the LTA.

Those who fail to send their devices for inspection by 1 April next year are liable to be fined up to $1,000, jailed up to three months, or both, if convicted. It is also an offence to ride an unregistered e-scooter on a public path. First-time offenders face a fine of up to $5,000, a jail term of up to three months, or both.


https://sg.yahoo.com/news/2-in-5-singaporeans-want-complete-ban-on-pmds-survey-100537281.html
 
Back
Top