• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Why Papayas REFUSE to Own Up to INSATIABLE GREED As Mother of All Problems?

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR>Try out these methods to boost taxi ridership
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->IT WAS reported that there were 8,805 fewer taxi rides in the first quarter of this year, compared to the corresponding period last year ('Fewer people taking taxis', last Saturday).
The combination of various surcharges during the morning and evening peak hours has mainly contributed to the dip in ridership. Besides these surcharges, passengers are also deterred from taking a cab as they have to pay hefty fees when passing through multiple Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) gantries to reach their destination.
It is indeed absurd that in a small island state, 24,000 cabs ply the roads, competing for a limited number of passengers.
The Taxi Operators' Association, which represents the interest of cabbies, should think of ways to cushion the impact which is expected to hit the earnings of cabbies in the long term. It is indeed gratifying to note that the association is working closely with taxi companies and the Land Transport Authority to promote taxi ridership in many forms.
I would like to offer my two cents' worth on how to encourage more people to take cabs:
- Reduce time-based peak hour surcharges from 35 per cent to 25 per cent and the city surcharge from $3 to $1.
- Waive fees for taxis passing through ERP gantries, with or without passengers. The number of taxis is far fewer than the number of passenger cars (900,000). Thus, it will not add to congestion as not all taxis will ply the same roads at the same time. If this is not possible, offer discounted ERP fees to taxis - for example, $1 and 50 cents when passing through each gantry during peak and off-peak hours respectively.
- Stop issuing licences to new taxi operators as there are far too many operators competing with one another.
- Downsize and impose a limit on the maximum number of taxis in each taxi fleet.
Lastly, taxi companies should not be too engrossed in making profit. Instead, they should help cabbies by reducing taxi rent and reducing the price of diesel during these difficult times. Poh Soon Leong
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=heading>Latest comments</TD></TR><TR><TD id=messageDisplayRegion width="100%"><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" class=Post cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>It is preposterous to think of spending public funds to promote taxi ridership. This is downright subsidy for a private (or is it government linked) company. Ridership is an open market element and the market trend should be allowed to take its course. Do we want to subsidise airlines because it is reported that airlines will face a bleak future? I thought we have always been told to avoid this soft populist culture!

The downturn affects everyone and taxi service is not exempt. The only natural action to try to boost ridership is to lower fares as a simple demand and supply mechanism. The taxi companies can do a great deal in this respect by lowering the rental of taxis.

The same public fund can be better used to dish out transport assistance for the low income public. for use in mass transit facilities. LTA should not squander our meagre public funds in the wrong cause.
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: Dialoger at Tue Jun 09 12:18:51 SGT 2009
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 

denzuko1

Alfrescian
Loyal
Actually the mentality is very similar to that of the Communist regime. In Communist country, there is no crime since everyone has a job and are happily working.

In Singapore, every MPs and Ministers are well fed with obscene amount of salary, therefore there is no corruption.
 
Top