Why NEA has refused to take action against market management committee

[Avantas]

Based on the media reports so far, one can easily conclude that the Geylang Serai market’s management committee have neglected its duties on at least two counts:

1. Failure to call for spring-cleaning of the premises only until last week in the aftermath of the mass food poisoning.

2. Failure to maintain basic standards of environmental hygiene at the premises which were infested with rats.

NEA has long insisted that it is in charge for the hygiene of permanent markets only.

In the case of temporary markets, ensuring cleanliness and tackling vermin infestations are the responsibility of the centre’s management committee.

Since the management committee of Geylang Serai temporary market has obviously flouted the rules, why are they not taken to task yet now that both MOH and NEA claimed they have “completed their investigations”?

Up to now, we are still kept in the dark over the identities of the members from the management committee.

The state media could have gotten hold of the information easily. Why are their identities being protected?

However, we do know that the Geylang Serai temporary market was a “project” by the Kampong Ubi Citizens Consultative Committee.

Read rest of article here:

http://wayangparty.com/?p=7877

 

[HakkaThaileen]

Reason: kar ki nang..

 

[mscitw]

Let us attempt to solve this problem using the 'One country Three System Theorem'.

Suppose NEA and Geyland Serai MC has balls, we must prove if NEA do not dare take action against MC, then MC has bigger balls.

Till today, the only action is taken against the seller despite glaring facts that MC and NEA has neglected their collective duties.

So going by the theorem, rojak seller has no balls, kenna slammed while NEA, mindful MC has some big balls decided to keep quiet and stop fingering MC.

Only in peasantpore.

 

[nickers9]

Based on the media reports so far, one can easily conclude that the Geylang Serai market’s management committee have neglected its duties on at least two counts:

1. Failure to call for spring-cleaning of the premises only until last week in the aftermath of the mass food poisoning.

2. Failure to maintain basic standards of environmental hygiene at the premises which were infested with rats.

NEA has long insisted that it is in charge for the hygiene of permanent markets only.

In the case of temporary markets, ensuring cleanliness and tackling vermin infestations are the responsibility of the centre’s management committee.

Since the management committee of Geylang Serai temporary market has obviously flouted the rules, why are they not taken to task yet now that both MOH and NEA claimed they have “completed their investigations”?

Up to now, we are still kept in the dark over the identities of the members from the management committee.

The state media could have gotten hold of the information easily. Why are their identities being protected?

However, we do know that the Geylang Serai temporary market was a “project” by the Kampong Ubi Citizens Consultative Committee.

Read rest of article here:

http://wayangparty.com/?p=7877

Cause their Master is one of the management committee member - Dr Yaacob Ibrahim.

So die die also cannot take action against their Master.

So rather sacrifice the Rojak Indian Man than their Master.