Why Is INTERNET BRIGADE Allowed To Do RECRUITMENT In This FORUM?

[ahleebabasingaporethief]

To moderators, why is he allowed to recruit. I have copied and posted below his signature on every thread. See below.:oIo:
​

For information on how you can be awarded for posting the right messages in forums, please contact [email protected]. <!-- / sig --> <!-- controls -->

 

[Internet Brigade]

What happened to freedom of speech and the deregulation of the internet that proponents of the PAP champion with such vigor... but apparently without much understanding?

 

[scroobal]

The Internet is for all except for trolls, spammers and those who can't behave themselves. This forum is the same. I wouldn't worry about this guy. He is struggling to construct a proper sentence let alone carry substance. The penny will drop once he figures out the difference between reward and award. I wish we could get some quality chaps from the other side to have a decent debate or discussion.

By the way, I think you are better of working on your format, font and colour. I doubt people bother to read when there are so many posts that are so much easier to read. First time might be an attention grabber but it becomes an irritant thereafter.

 

[Internet Brigade]

The Internet is for all except for trolls, spammers and those who can't behave themselves. This forum is the same. I wouldn't worry about this guy. He is struggling to construct a proper sentence let alone carry substance. The penny will drop once he figures out the difference between reward and award. I wish we could get some quality chaps from the other side to have a decent debate or discussion.

By the way, I think you are better of working on your format, font and colour. I doubt people bother to read when there are so many posts that are so much easier to read. First time might be an attention grabber but it becomes an irritant thereafter.

May i ask when i have displayed troll or spammer like behaviour?

 

[Internet Brigade]

The Internet is for all except for trolls, spammers and those who can't behave themselves. This forum is the same. I wouldn't worry about this guy. He is struggling to construct a proper sentence let alone carry substance. The penny will drop once he figures out the difference between reward and award. I wish we could get some quality chaps from the other side to have a decent debate or discussion.

By the way, I think you are better of working on your format, font and colour. I doubt people bother to read when there are so many posts that are so much easier to read. First time might be an attention grabber but it becomes an irritant thereafter.

You are the moderator of this forum... but you are not the moderator of truth nor the judge of substance.

And really, why do you feel the need to attack everyones arguments based on their command of the english language? In this internet age, anyone can pretend to be articulate when armed with online dictionaries and thesauruses.

 

[scroobal]

You are one blur bugger. The reply says that you are free to post.

What happened to freedom of speech and the deregulation of the internet that proponents of the PAP champion with such vigor... but apparently without much understanding?

May i ask when i have displayed troll or spammer like behaviour?

 

[Internet Brigade]

You are one blur bugger. The reply says that you are free to post.

So are you referring to ahleebababtheif?

 

[scroobal]

You are definitely a blur bugger. You know what is the meaning of moderator? Got nothing to do with the truth. Why did you assume that moderators have to have a measure of substance. Its an admin function no different to a security guard opening and closing gate.

Its fitting that your avatar is that of the most blur looking cabinet minister.

You are the moderator of this forum... but you are not the moderator of truth nor the judge of substance.

 

[Internet Brigade]

You are definitely a blur bugger. You know what is the meaning of moderator? Got nothing to do with the truth. Why did you assume that moderators have to have a measure of substance. Its an admin function no different to a security guard opening and closing gate.

Its fitting that your avatar is that of the most blur looking cabinet minister.

Then you dont do a very good job of moderating spammers and trolls now do you?

I do not assume moderators do that. I was just making an observation that you patrol this forum like the moral police thats all. You claim to want to debate but it seems you merely want an audience.

 

[scroobal]

Within a few posts in one thread you managed to tie yourself in knots. First thing you need to do is get off that horse, lose the cape and sword plus the avatar as well as the nick. Pick something neutral, encouraging or appetising.

Either post something substantial or engage a thread where something substantial is being discussed. With all that fluff flying around, there still some very good posts where good debates are occurring. PAP has delivered some good programs - why not highlight those.

Don't worry about my moderating prowess or the lack of it. It sucks and I will probably get the sack sooner rather than later.

ps. at least pick a cabinet minister that does not look like a sotong.

Then you dont do a very good job of moderating spammers and trolls now do you?

I do not assume moderators do that. I was just making an observation that you patrol this forum like the moral police thats all. You claim to want to debate but it seems you merely want an audience.

 

[Ash007]

Yes, I do agree that having some quality chaps from the other side would make some very interesting discussion in this forum. From what I have observed, the "Papees" supporters in the forum are just wannabes that are either seeking attention. trolling/spamming, or are just trying to hit a raw nerve once in a while. I haven't seen any good quality personal from say, YPap, or even anyone from the ministerial. Perhaps there is a blanket order to avoid SBF, given the history of the forum and need to "control" official information from the party.

The Internet is for all except for trolls, spammers and those who can't behave themselves. This forum is the same. I wouldn't worry about this guy. He is struggling to construct a proper sentence let alone carry substance. The penny will drop once he figures out the difference between reward and award. I wish we could get some quality chaps from the other side to have a decent debate or discussion.

By the way, I think you are better of working on your format, font and colour. I doubt people bother to read when there are so many posts that are so much easier to read. First time might be an attention grabber but it becomes an irritant thereafter.

 

[Einfield]

Right Messages??
You mean PAP approved propaganda.
Morons, never in shortage here.


For information on how you can be awarded for posting the right messages in forums, please contact [email protected]. <!-- / sig --> <!-- controls --> [/QUOTE]

 

[scroobal]

I am sure we all be so much better if got both sides of the picture. The ones we currently have are just fans but are unable to articulate their view points or worse still have no clue why a certain policy has been implemented. One interesting thing that I realised is that they get upset when a criticism is valid and don't realise that some of us are harsh on the opposition as well.

Yes, I do agree that having some quality chaps from the other side would make some very interesting discussion in this forum. From what I have observed, the "Papees" supporters in the forum are just wannabes that are either seeking attention. trolling/spamming, or are just trying to hit a raw nerve once in a while. I haven't seen any good quality personal from say, YPap, or even anyone from the ministerial. Perhaps there is a blanket order to avoid SBF, given the history of the forum and need to "control" official information from the party.

 

[Ash007]

Here is a thought, anyway you/someone can invite someone from Papees to come in here?

I am sure we all be so much better if got both sides of the picture. The ones we currently have are just fans but are unable to articulate their view points or worse still have no clue why a certain policy has been implemented. One interesting thing that I realised is that they get upset when a criticism is valid and don't realise that some of us are harsh on the opposition as well.

 

[ChaoPappyPoodle]

HAHA! PAP! The PAP is a bloody joke. You guys take your control over the media and many goverment agencies to back your spurious arguments. Within the 154th you may succeed but on the Net, you show yourselves to be fools that lack any decent moral fibre.

You are a bunch of worms bred and educated to feed on your own kind!

 

[Internet Brigade]

HAHA! PAP! The PAP is a bloody joke. You guys take your control over the media and many goverment agencies to back your spurious arguments. Within the 154th you may succeed but on the Net, you show yourselves to be fools that lack any decent moral fibre.

You are a bunch of worms bred and educated to feed on your own kind!

Another great example of the kind of debate endorsed by Scroobal.

Oh but i better not get upset because his argument is valid, articulate and neutral

 

[Internet Brigade]

Within a few posts in one thread you managed to tie yourself in knots. First thing you need to do is get off that horse, lose the cape and sword plus the avatar as well as the nick. Pick something neutral, encouraging or appetising.

Either post something substantial or engage a thread where something substantial is being discussed. With all that fluff flying around, there still some very good posts where good debates are occurring. PAP has delivered some good programs - why not highlight those.

Don't worry about my moderating prowess or the lack of it. It sucks and I will probably get the sack sooner rather than later.

ps. at least pick a cabinet minister that does not look like a sotong.

You enjoy telling people to change their fonts, and avatar pictures. You also enjoy lecturing people on the need to be neutral when debating cases.

First of all, you are not neutral.

Secondly, everyone is not neutral.

And you keep harping about how you are not the moderator of substance.... yet you say this:

Either post something substantial or engage a thread where something substantial is being discussed. With all that fluff flying around, there still some very good posts where good debates are occurring.

Please dont be a hypocrite.

To everyone in this forum. You have heard it from Scroobal. Be neutral and encouraging but it still must be appetising to him!

 

[Yoshitsune Minamoto]

Another great example of the kind of debate endorsed by Scroobal.

Oh but i better not get upset because his argument is valid, articulate and neutral

Why should you be upset? Were your postings deleted by the moderator?

 

[iamtalkinglah]

One interesting thing that I realised is that they get upset when a criticism is valid and don't realise that some of us are harsh on the opposition as well.

Ya! Like me!

We cannot vote any other parties just bcoz PAP is not good. The opposition party have to show to us that they deserve our vote too.

 

[Internet Brigade]

Why should you be upset? Were your postings deleted by the moderator?

No thats not it. Read the whole thread and you see I did not start this.