Why didn't TRWatch accuse SPH of plagiarism?

[flyingdagger]

TR stalker TRWatch started a blog to accuse TR of plagiarizing articles:

This is a usual practice adopted by many online newspapers including The Malaysian Insider and our own Straits Times which republishes articles daily from Reuters, AFP and AP.

As you can see from the above snapshot which TRWatch pasted on his blog there is a word "SCMP" at the end of the article to indicate that the article was originally published on "South China Morning Post" - a Hong Kong Daily.

The Straits Times also republishes articles from AFP on its site using the same mode of acknowledgment as TR:

The source of the original article is simply listed as "AFP" at the end of it.

Going by TRWatch's warped logic, then SPH must have plagiarized many articles from AFP!

Now why didn't TRWatch start a blog to accuse SPH of plagiarism?

Is he linked to SPH?

What a fool he has made of himself!!!

 

[hellfire]

maybe this TRWatch is a TR mole himself out to promote the site?

 

[tanboonlock]

This is so lame. TRWatch really has no life.

 

[flyingsword]

it is getting so obvious that he must been paid to monitor SBF 24 hours a day.

 

[antitrwatch]

This is common sense. You mean he set up a site just to attack TR? What a baboon!

 

[Choon Yong]

TR should sue him for defamation.

 

[crazytrwatch]

Like this also can?

Read my nick