- Joined
- Jul 14, 2008
- Messages
- 6,464
- Points
- 0
From a fellow migrant,
The USA, Canada, Australia & Israel are 4 countries that have a history diversity in their genes and are open liberal society.
What we migrants are discovering from our offsprings are people who are creative thinkers, people who grow up dealing with ambiquity and complexity - and most importantly, good collaborators.
These days, Noble Prize winners are usually collaborated effort, unlike in the olden days.
- - -
It takes 60 days for China to create a iPad knockoff, but they cannot innovate. Just head to the luxury car showrooms and brandname shopping outlets and see all the Chinese buying up new ideas, new creations and innovation.
In a totalitarian environment like Singapore, the leaders can only buy in foreign talents because the Singapore system do not accept destructive innovation. (to create a new product, the old one must die, vinyl to CD, VHS to DVD etc)
Looking at how Singapore protect its own industries and try to control the process of innovation - this kill innovation.
But luckily, as a small country, Singapore is able to adapt and find niche markets - the process I call scavenger economics - and they do it with limited success. Taking over talents from the London financial market, setting up "hubs" etc.
The USA, Canada, Australia & Israel are 4 countries that have a history diversity in their genes and are open liberal society.
What we migrants are discovering from our offsprings are people who are creative thinkers, people who grow up dealing with ambiquity and complexity - and most importantly, good collaborators.
These days, Noble Prize winners are usually collaborated effort, unlike in the olden days.
- - -
It takes 60 days for China to create a iPad knockoff, but they cannot innovate. Just head to the luxury car showrooms and brandname shopping outlets and see all the Chinese buying up new ideas, new creations and innovation.
In a totalitarian environment like Singapore, the leaders can only buy in foreign talents because the Singapore system do not accept destructive innovation. (to create a new product, the old one must die, vinyl to CD, VHS to DVD etc)
Looking at how Singapore protect its own industries and try to control the process of innovation - this kill innovation.
But luckily, as a small country, Singapore is able to adapt and find niche markets - the process I call scavenger economics - and they do it with limited success. Taking over talents from the London financial market, setting up "hubs" etc.
Last edited: