• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Why Bond Applicable to Only to Sporns? FTrash Get It Free!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Word, deed and bond
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- 4 or less paragraphs so show all paragraphs first before showing the media and bkstry and stuffs --><!-- story content : start -->'No one is forcing them to take up the offer.' <!-- story content : start -->MR PAUL CHAN: 'My perspective is different from Ms Denise Khng's in her letter on Tuesday, 'Youth are committed to bonds, but job satisfaction crucial too'. A scholarship is like a mutual benefit contract in which the recipient obtains full financial support and and promises to work for the provider in return. It is on a willing buyer and willing seller basis. Some regard scholarships as a prestigious award, while others resort to it out of financial difficulty. The decision to embrace a scholarship offer is like investing in one's future career with borrowed capital from a bank. One must pay it back through a bond of service for an agreed duration. If one does not feel comfortable with such a time-honoured practice, don't take it. Why should scholarship providers change the paradigm to suit the wishes of today's youth? No one is forcing them to take up the offer.'
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Scholarship students should be allowed to break bonds
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I REFER to the current debate on scholarship bonds.
If a scholarship holder is unhappy with his working environment, and he can afford to pay back the bond, he should be allowed to break the bond. After all, it is pointless for the organisation to retain someone who has lost interest.
The organisation can then make use of the money to offer another person a scholarship.
This is a win-win situation for both the scholarship holder and the organisation. Woo Jia Qian (Miss)
 
Top