<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Word, deed and bond
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>
<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- 4 or less paragraphs so show all paragraphs first before showing the media and bkstry and stuffs --><!-- story content : start -->'No one is forcing them to take up the offer.' <!-- story content : start -->MR PAUL CHAN: 'My perspective is different from Ms Denise Khng's in her letter on Tuesday, 'Youth are committed to bonds, but job satisfaction crucial too'. A scholarship is like a mutual benefit contract in which the recipient obtains full financial support and and promises to work for the provider in return. It is on a willing buyer and willing seller basis. Some regard scholarships as a prestigious award, while others resort to it out of financial difficulty. The decision to embrace a scholarship offer is like investing in one's future career with borrowed capital from a bank. One must pay it back through a bond of service for an agreed duration. If one does not feel comfortable with such a time-honoured practice, don't take it. Why should scholarship providers change the paradigm to suit the wishes of today's youth? No one is forcing them to take up the offer.'
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>
<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- 4 or less paragraphs so show all paragraphs first before showing the media and bkstry and stuffs --><!-- story content : start -->'No one is forcing them to take up the offer.' <!-- story content : start -->MR PAUL CHAN: 'My perspective is different from Ms Denise Khng's in her letter on Tuesday, 'Youth are committed to bonds, but job satisfaction crucial too'. A scholarship is like a mutual benefit contract in which the recipient obtains full financial support and and promises to work for the provider in return. It is on a willing buyer and willing seller basis. Some regard scholarships as a prestigious award, while others resort to it out of financial difficulty. The decision to embrace a scholarship offer is like investing in one's future career with borrowed capital from a bank. One must pay it back through a bond of service for an agreed duration. If one does not feel comfortable with such a time-honoured practice, don't take it. Why should scholarship providers change the paradigm to suit the wishes of today's youth? No one is forcing them to take up the offer.'