• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Why aren't S'pore banks cutting rates? Uniquely Sg Theory AGAIN?

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Why aren't S'pore banks cutting rates?
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I REFER to last Friday's article, 'Central banks cut rates to save economy', which reported that the Bank of England and the European Central Bank cut interest rates by 50 basis points to record lows of 0.5 per cent and 1.5 per cent respectively.
In other reports, Malaysia cut rates to a record low of 2.5 per cent and the Philippines slashed rates to 4.75 per cent. Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and others have also cut their interest rates, some several times, since the global financial crisis unfolded last September.
In the United States, the Federal Reserve has lowered rates from more than 5 per cent two years ago to near zero today.
In Singapore, Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew has raised the spectre of a 10 per cent drop in this year's gross domestic product. A bank economist has estimated that 100,000 jobs could be shed this year, the highest in our history. Singapore is in its worst recession, even more terrible than in 1985, 2001 and 2003.
Yet I watch with amazement and disbelief as the oligopolistic banks in Singapore hold the prime lending rate steady at 5 per cent, unchanged for more than 10 years. Board rates, which determine the final mortgage rate home owners have to pay, have similarly been kept unchanged.
Thus it comes as no surprise to read that all banks have made profits from their Singapore operations in their latest result announcements, albeit lower than in previous quarters, with Standard Chartered Bank actually making record profits. All this while smaller companies are folding around them, and job losses escalating.
Why do banks, both local and foreign, not lower prime and mortgage rates? And why does the watchdog, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, allow this situation to continue? Can it not force banks to lower their rates? Yet over the past six months, banks have steadily reduced only the savings rate, thus increasing their margins.
Traditionally, our interest rates have been lower than Malaysia's for as long as I can remember. Today, Malaysia's rate is way lower than ours. Zhang Bao Guang
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=heading>Latest comments</TD></TR><TR><TD id=messageDisplayRegion width="100%"><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE class=Post style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>firstly, singapore banks are what i call "legalised loan sharks"

secondly, the banks know that in this financially uncertain time, not many people dare to refinance their housing loan for fear of loan rejection by the new banks

for the borrowers who have been faithful with the installment payments, the bank will happily leave them alone with the high interest margin = fat profit to the bank = sucker customers

borrowers may not be able to find new banks willing to approve refinancing loan due to the drop in valuation of their property, which could well be in negative equity position

so, sit tight, pay through your nose, even when the interest rates (SIBOR) is low...there is no real benefit attainable to the average housing borrowers on the street
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: bumibumi at Tue Mar 10 12:10:58 SGT 2009
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE class=AlternatePost style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>The writer obviously does not understand anything about how the interest rate is set and how the interbank money market works. It would help if he would read up on the subject first before shooting off his mouth.

FYI, the MAS is the one that sets the interest rate level through its actions in the interbank market.
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: cchan4 at Tue Mar 10 10:59:19 SGT 2009
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE class=Post style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>banks are like the musketeers, "one for all, all for one".
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: coffeeshoptalk at Tue Mar 10 10:34:00 SGT 2009
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE class=AlternatePost style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>In that case, they just have to get ready for more people defaulting on their loans.
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: wudang10 at Tue Mar 10 10:27:39 SGT 2009
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE class=Post style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>s'pore being is a small market they know it's not wise to undercut each other. the public will just have to live with that.
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: gemini58 at Tue Mar 10 09:51:01 SGT 2009
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
They are cutting deposit rates.
Loan rates? Hahaha, that's a different matter.
 

zuoom

Alfrescian
Loyal
how banks loan out money is by risk assessment.

if they assess there's more risk of defaulting, then they would naturally pegged the % higher.

in a way, it can be view as an indication on how confident the banks are to the borrower.

at least they are lending now, for a period of time, they were not approving loans n reducing the amount for many... till the govt took up the main bulk (from 50%-80%) of the loan risk.

money they earn, risk the govt take.

if you ask me, it's a good time for the banks.
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
how banks loan out money is by risk assessment.

if they assess there's more risk of defaulting, then they would naturally pegged the % higher.

in a way, it can be view as an indication on how confident the banks are to the borrower.

.


When I had a housing loan before the crisis, the banks would periodically increase the interest rate. The interest never went down :eek:

I got the loan because I had a job & good credit history. So what is this increase risk?

I got tired with what the games they were playing & paid off the loan & now life is simpler :rolleyes:
 
Top