- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 33,627
- Points
- 0
Mar 3, 2010
Bearing brunt of budget flight changes
<!-- by line --><!-- end by line -->
<!-- end left side bar --><!-- story content : start -->
WE HAD always intended to visit Langkawi during the school holidays, so when Tiger Airways had a promotion last year- end, offering tickets at nine cents (excluding taxes), we reserved 11 seats for the school holidays in June.
After receiving confirmation, we booked our accommodation, keeping in mind there will be high demand during peak periods.
However, our nightmare began soon after. In January, we received an e-mail from Tiger Airways telling us that, as a result of increased customer demand for its low-fare services, it had to reschedule our flight. The time of the flight had changed as a result. The airline apologised for any inconvenience, and promised to minimise any disruption to our travel plans by keeping rescheduling to a minimum.
We accepted the changes. Then we received another message from Tiger Airways telling us the new flight had been suspended, due to increased customer demand.
We realise there must have been a surge of demand for cheap air tickets during the Natas fair, but surely Tiger Airways should have anticipated this. If it cannot expect to meet this demand, it should have excluded the June school holidays from its promotion last year.
Tiger Airways has agreed to make a refund and said we should receive it within 14 working days. It has also offered an alternative destination of Penang at no additional cost. However, we have paid for our room reservation and cannot get a refund from the operator.
It is unfair that we have to bear the cost due to the haphazard way in which Tiger Airways operates. Surely the airline could be more responsible.
Ang Teo Tee (Madam)
Bearing brunt of budget flight changes
<!-- by line --><!-- end by line -->
<!-- end left side bar --><!-- story content : start -->
WE HAD always intended to visit Langkawi during the school holidays, so when Tiger Airways had a promotion last year- end, offering tickets at nine cents (excluding taxes), we reserved 11 seats for the school holidays in June.
After receiving confirmation, we booked our accommodation, keeping in mind there will be high demand during peak periods.
However, our nightmare began soon after. In January, we received an e-mail from Tiger Airways telling us that, as a result of increased customer demand for its low-fare services, it had to reschedule our flight. The time of the flight had changed as a result. The airline apologised for any inconvenience, and promised to minimise any disruption to our travel plans by keeping rescheduling to a minimum.
We accepted the changes. Then we received another message from Tiger Airways telling us the new flight had been suspended, due to increased customer demand.
We realise there must have been a surge of demand for cheap air tickets during the Natas fair, but surely Tiger Airways should have anticipated this. If it cannot expect to meet this demand, it should have excluded the June school holidays from its promotion last year.
Tiger Airways has agreed to make a refund and said we should receive it within 14 working days. It has also offered an alternative destination of Penang at no additional cost. However, we have paid for our room reservation and cannot get a refund from the operator.
It is unfair that we have to bear the cost due to the haphazard way in which Tiger Airways operates. Surely the airline could be more responsible.
Ang Teo Tee (Madam)