-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Who says females cannot do NS?
- Thread starter laksaboy
- Start date
Woke will be dead soon.
Anyway if the israeli women can do NS, so can SG. After all we're following their lead.
So eventually with the low birthrates, women will have to serve.
Unless you vote them out.
Anyway if the israeli women can do NS, so can SG. After all we're following their lead.
So eventually with the low birthrates, women will have to serve.
Unless you vote them out.
Must put TPL in outfield.
Not a good idea to put women in the front line. They can manage the logistics and supplies Coordination from the back.
ns for women: no skirt?
For White Horses.
No underwear. Easier for the troops to shoot and hit target.
Should women do National Service now? Societal cost will 'far outweigh' benefits, says Ng Eng Hen
SINGAPORE: The “societal cost” of enlisting women into National Service (NS) now will “far outweigh” the benefits, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen told Parliament on Monday (May 9).
“Women will be delayed in their entry into the workforce. The immediate effect will be an accentuated decline in the size of our local workforce, and a reduction of household incomes,” he said.
“Even if women are enlisted for non-military National Service roles to augment our healthcare and social services, it may make manpower shortages in other industries worse. Over the long term, it will impose a great cost not only on women themselves, but also on their families, children and spouses and society as a whole.
“Is that cost justified to send a signal or to reverse stereotypes? From the Government’s perspective, no. I think most Singaporeans would say no too, from a security perspective.”
bull’s eye in a bushy target?
Who he protecting?
Only war SG is fighting is against diabetes.
Similar threads
