• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Which new small digicam have the best IQ in good light? Sigma DP1 and DP2 Merrill.

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
dp2m.jpg


highres-ssigma-dp2-merrill-3_1344517315.jpg


highres-ssigma-dp2-merrill-7_1344517377.jpg


highres-ssigma-dp2-merrill-6_1344517357.jpg


highres-ssigma-dp2-merrill-4_1344517330.jpg


highres-ssigma-dp2-merrill-9_1344517411.jpg


Key Features

48 megapixel Foveon APS-C X3 Direct Image CMOS sensor
Effective Pixels: 46MP (4,800×3,200×3)
19mm f/2.8 lens equivalent to 28mm = DP1 Merrill
30mm f/2.8 lens equivalent to 45mm = DP2 Merrill
3 inch 920k dot screen
VGA, 30fps video
ISO: AUTO (ISO200~ISO800) ISO100 - 6400
Manual / Aperture / Shutter modes
Flash hot-shoe
 
Last edited:

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Which new small digicam have the best IQ in good light? Sigma DP1 and DP2 Merrill

sigma-vs-rx100.jpg

Left is Sigma DP2 Merrill and right is Sony RX100.

Winner is DP2M.
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Which new small digicam have the best IQ in good light? Sigma DP1 and DP2 Merrill

nex7-dp2m.jpg

Left is Sigma DP2 Merrill and right is Sony NEX-7

Winner is DP2M
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Which new small digicam have the best IQ in good light? Sigma DP1 and DP2 Merrill

x100-dp2m.jpg


Left is Sigma DP2M and right is Fujifilm X100

Winner is Sigma DP2M.
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Which new small digicam have the best IQ in good light? Sigma DP1 and DP2 Merrill

Weakness: Good for ISO 400

ISO 100 and 200 are typically very clean. ISO 400 a bit less so, but not so that you'd even need to crank up any noise reduction in post. Above 400 starts to get iffy, and to my mind this just isn't a camera for which high ISO work is its forte.
Shadows are clean, and unless one really pushes them open to an extreme degree there is no visible banding at 100, 200 or 400.

Bad battery life
The battery life of the DP2M is poor; somewhere between 75 and 125 images. The reason for this is two-fold. The battery is small and the power drain from the X3 sensor along with dual custom processors is high. The answer would have been a larger battery. The camera is already about as large as it wants to be, and it's my surmise that this is where Sigma's engineers had to compromise. To Sigma's credit, they include two batteries with the camera, an industry first if I'm not mistaken.

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/sigma_dp2m_review.shtml
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Which new small digicam have the best IQ in good light? Sigma DP1 and DP2 Merrill

Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview

With a major sensor and processor upgrade, the new Sigma DP1 Merrill becomes the highest-resolution fixed-lens rangefinder-style camera on the planet, according to Sigma. (That is, apart from its normal focal length twin, the DP2 Merrill.) If you're looking for a super-high resolution walk-around camera with a 28mm equivalent, single-focal-length lens, the DP1 Merrill certainly deserves a closer look.

(If you've read the preview of the DP2 Merrill, you know pretty much everything about the Sigma DP1 Merrill as well. The only differences are that the DP1 Merrill is a wide-angle camera, with a 28mm equivalent lens, and a slight difference in body size and weight.)

While earlier upgrades to the DP1 and DP2 models were relatively minor, the new Sigma DP1 Merrill is an entirely new camera, despite using the same model number as the previous generation. (The "Merrill" in the model name is homage to the late Dick Merrill, a cofounder of Foveon and co-inventor of the Foveon technology.) Incorporating the same 46-megapixel, 14.8 million photosite sensor as Sigma's SD1, the Sigma DP1 Merrill should easily outstrip the resolution of any other single-focal-length rangefinder-style camera on the market. While 14.8 million pixels in the finished files may not sound all that impressive, we found that images from the SD1 held their own quite well with those from 24-megapixel full-frame SLRs. We expect similar performance from this new DP model. (See the note at the bottom of this preview for more detail on pixels and resolution with the Foveon sensor technology.)

As noted, the massive sensor upgrade is only the tip of the iceberg here. The Sigma DP1 Merrill also received dual TRUE-II processors to handle the increase in data, a new lens, a new body, and an all-new control layout. The Sigma DP1 Merrill 's 19mm lens still has a 28mm equivalent focal length thanks to the larger sensor, but is faster than the DP1x's 16.6mm lens, with a maximum aperture of f/2.8 versus f/4.0 on the previous model.

While it looks smaller in the photos, the Sigma DP1 Merrill is actually slightly bigger and beefier than its predecessor, with dimensions of 4.8 x 2.6 x 2.5 inches, and weighing in at 12 ounces. (As compared to the DP1x's 4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0" and 8.8 ounces.) That's a modest handful; larger than some smaller Micro Four Thirds models, but considerably smaller than other high-end cameras like the recently announced Fuji X-Pro1. The larger body size does permit a 3-inch, 920,000-dot LCD monitor, a big step up from the 2.5-inch 230,000-dot screen on the earlier model.

The Sigma DP1 Merrill's control layout is new and different from that of the DP1x in a number of respects. Rear-panel controls are largely similar, although the button spacing has changed somewhat, the zoom in/out buttons have vanished, and there's no longer a control wheel under your thumb at the top of the rear panel.

The top deck has changed even more, with no dedicated mode dial as before, but rather a Mode button, presumably to be used in conjunction with the dial that now surrounds the shutter button, and also serves the zoom in/out function as well. The other big change is that the earlier internal flash has also been dropped, so flash photography will now involve an external unit attached to the standard hot shoe above the lens.

All in all, the Sigma DP1 Merrill looks like a nice little package for high-resolution "street" photography: We can't wait to get our hands on one
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Which new small digicam have the best IQ in good light? Sigma DP1 and DP2 Merrill

Quick Comparison – Leica Monochrom, Sigma DP2 Merrill and Hasselblad 39CF

Conditions:

Dim room light

1.7 meters to subject

All images had gone through only contrast adjustment, no sharpening

On tripod

-

Hasselblad 39CF with 80mm CFE lens F2.8, F5.6 1/2, 1/4S

The Hasselblad yielded a pleasing overall image in terms of tone and rendering. With 39 mega pixels 49x36mm sensor, we don’t expect anything less. The 100% crop shows that even when wide open, the CFE lens is sharp and shows nice contrast. Note that the physical size of the Hasselblad image is almost twice as large than the Leica and Sigma.

8371384287_c7dc8e528f_k-2-680x510.jpg

Hassey crop
8371384899_6f605218b1_b-680x439.jpg


Finally comes the Sigma DP2 Merrill.

I couldn’t believe my eyes when I saw the pictures. It is clearly the most rich and detailed of all three. The photo was shot with the lens wide open at F2.8. Astounding details and color. Now look at that 100% crop. The texture of each brush stroke is so vivid. Beats the Hasselblad hands down.
8372492528_a65fb872a7_k-1-680x453.jpg

DP2 Crop
8371420289_59f795c865_b-680x409.jpg

Conclusion? Well this is a very clumsy test. But besides the poor testing conditions I think there’s a story to be told here. All three are great camera systems. The Hasselblad is older and the lens probably could have used with more stopping down. But this is also a 9000 dollar set up (used price). The Monochrome setup is 12K all in (when bought new). The Leica lens is incredibly sharp and the Monochrome retains so much details in the shadows. But the ultimate winner here is the Sigma DP2. At a tiny fraction of the price of either the Hassey or the Leica, it delivers the best results in color, details, and contrast.
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Which new small digicam have the best IQ in good light? Sigma DP1 and DP2 Merrill

Ultimate Quality Test - Part 1 - Four Camera Comparison

Forget high ISO, forget speed of operation, forget versatility, which of these camera and lens combinations gives me the best image quality at the aperture I use the most, f/8 and at each cameras base, and therefore highest quality, ISO?

4-way.jpg
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Which new small digicam have the best IQ in good light? Sigma DP1 and DP2 Merrill

Ultimate Quality Test - Part 2 - Two Camera Comparison

2-way.jpg

this is a comparison between the Sigma DP2 Merrill and my Nikon D800E fitted with a 28-300mm VR zoom.
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Which new small digicam have the best IQ in good light? Sigma DP1 and DP2 Merrill

Replacement of DP Merrill.
Ugly.
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Which new small digicam have the best IQ in good light? Sigma DP1 and DP2 Merrill

Sigma-dp2-Quattro-Camera-on-Display-at-CP-2014.jpg


140210_sigma_dp_ru_04.jpg


140210_sigma_dp_ru_05.jpg
 
Last edited:

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Re: Which new small digicam have the best IQ in good light? Sigma DP1 and DP2 Merrill

My favourite camera is now my Olympus OM-D E-M1 for everything except action photography.

I bought the Fujifilm X-T1, used it once and have not touched it since. The controls are nuts and it has no touch screen. Wasted my money.
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Which new small digicam have the best IQ in good light? Sigma DP1 and DP2 Merrill

My favourite camera is now my Olympus OM-D E-M1 for everything except action photography.

I bought the Fujifilm X-T1, used it once and have not touched it since. The controls are nuts and it has no touch screen. Wasted my money.

yeah the exposure compensation is too tight, not smooth like sony, the other dial require you to press the button on the top to turn it. Instead of changing all settings with one hand only, you have to look away from viewfinder and make settings on the top , which are too much for photographer who constantly need to make adjustment. No touch screen mean you cannot take picture by pressing your finger on the LCD. All very disappointing, that why i did not buy X-T1.
 
Top