My vote is wrestling
muay thai
first of all, wrestling is fake. secondly, it cant "counter" or "take them down" because the moment wrestler run towards them they can knee or kick him away no chance to get them on the ground.Muay Thai is a complete stand up fighting but is not purely striking and they have sweeping and clinch.
Their style counter by wrestling. Once wrestler take them down, they can't do much on the ground. Being say tat muay Thai also stand a chance to knock them out. Wrestling do counter them base on MMA.
Learning wrestling first after that learn striking will be easier. Learning striking first after that learn grappling would be harder.
agree.Muay Thai is a complete stand up fighting but is not purely striking and they have sweeping and clinch.
Their style counter by wrestling. Once wrestler take them down, they can't do much on the ground. Being say tat muay Thai also stand a chance to knock them out. Wrestling do counter them base on MMA.
Learning wrestling first after that learn striking will be easier. Learning striking first after that learn grappling would be harder.
oi! "professional wrestling" aka the one you see on tv is fake. the olympic or greco-roman wrestling practiced in schools in angmohland and semi-professional competitions is absolutely real. don't mess with these guys. fight is over before it even starts if they grab you.first of all, wrestling is fake. secondly, it cant "counter" or "take them down" because the moment wrestler run towards them they can knee or kick him away no chance to get them on the ground.
grappling in mma is largely bjj. you are right in that in a real fight bjj is a joke. honestly, a lot of people say mma is realistic and representative of a street fight. for anyone with any experience this is obviously garbage. mma rules tend to favour submission moves which bjj is built around. if you remove the rules, the bjj guy would probably be dead.grappling is very stupid and boring thing in mma, can see on tv is win due to technical rules. in a real street fight, muay thai works better because groundwork is useless without rules and ppl can bite or scratch.
oops forgot about those loloi! "professional wrestling" aka the one you see on tv is fake. the olympic or greco-roman wrestling practiced in schools in angmohland and semi-professional competitions is absolutely real. don't mess with these guys. fight is over before it even starts if they grab you.
yah without rules can easily grab balls and jab eyes etc rather than waste time trying to manoeuvre outgrappling in mma is largely bjj. you are right in that in a real fight bjj is a joke. honestly, a lot of people say mma is realistic and representative of a street fight. for anyone with any experience this is obviously garbage. mma rules tend to favour submission moves which bjj is built around. if you remove the rules, the bjj guy would probably be dead.
'xactly!yah without rules can easily grab balls and jab eyes etc rather than waste time trying to manoeuvre out
good but is more like gymnastics than martial artsCCP's MARTIAL ARTS EXPLAINED
CCP's Martial arts start at young age. If the tutor found some hidden talent in the boy or girl, they would train him or her to the extreme
Please watch below:
View attachment 176416
Is it good or bad?
good but is more like gymnastics than martial arts
exactly, martial arts is different. your first clip of the boy and second clip of the girl both just show them doing backflips.HAHA. I am not against such a rigorous practice if it came from his own parent.
However, Marial arts is different. believe me the following video clip of only 6 seconds describes the best Gym freak who did her best ever.
Those who have the nicks and knacks in Gym moves may agree with me.
View attachment 176492
Bruce Lee would be a good fighter. He is very flexible and the way I saw how bendy he is, he really can kick fast and hard. Then he also a boxing champion in his high school.
Kungfu Ping Pong