• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

When Retards Tells You "Socialism Will Work This Time," Send Them This Video

When morons tell u capitalism works, remind them of Great Depression 1930. Capitalism try and try again always end up need socialism to save economy. :rolleyes:
 
say what you want about the old man the results dont lie. where would we be if SG did not say economy first?
 
All the stupid idoits telling people things dun work...

No fuging system works if we say it like this...

The real problem is not the system in place.

ITs the people involved running the show that ruins the govt.

Then why does corrupted system like dictatorship works longer than normal system??? simple. They oppressed people for extended period of time to prevent the change to people at the top.

All the fuging systems works. Just who is more efficient under different leadership. It also doesnt mean metritocracy is better because as we can see from singapore that govt oppressed meritocracy and changes the system in a hidden way but keep calling it meritocracy...

Like china is actually a council oppressed state under command of few certain families but they called it communist.
 
All the stupid idoits telling people things dun work...

No fuging system works if we say it like this...

The real problem is not the system in place.

ITs the people involved running the show that ruins the govt.

Then why does corrupted system like dictatorship works longer than normal system??? simple. They oppressed people for extended period of time to prevent the change to people at the top.

All the fuging systems works. Just who is more efficient under different leadership. It also doesnt mean metritocracy is better because as we can see from singapore that govt oppressed meritocracy and changes the system in a hidden way but keep calling it meritocracy...

Like china is actually a council oppressed state under command of few certain families but they called it communist.
If you follow the communist train of thought, the ultimate conclusion that arises is just what you stated which I put in bold.
 
When morons tell u capitalism works, remind them of Great Depression 1930. Capitalism try and try again always end up need socialism to save economy. :rolleyes:

Retards forget what follows after depression and that is growth. Whereas in Communism and socialism cases, what follows is unending chaos, destruction, famine and ruins.
 
Retards forget what follows after depression and that is growth. Whereas in Communism and socialism cases, what follows is unending chaos, destruction, famine and ruins.
Silly man you. Depression cause by capitalism, saved by FD Roosevelt socialism! So ignorant are u. :rolleyes:
 
Silly man you. Depression cause by capitalism, saved by FD Roosevelt socialism! So ignorant are u. :rolleyes:

Retards lah you. Socialism never the solution and never will. US got out of depression as soon as it appears because it was never socialism. US is and always will be capitalist. North Korea is in shit because of socialism. Even India ditch it as it never work and now on the way to capitalism. India is lucky as it is democratic and people can ditch the type of government that is not working. China cannot.
 
only idiots support capitalism like the idiots who support PAP.........people who support socialism knows whats good for them,is good for the gander.

capitalism only serves to extract wealth from the masses and channel them to the hands of a few,socialism is for the good of all......just like the good old pledge of Singapore which in the 21st century is just an aspiration.....


refer to this thread and read it carefully from top to bottom if u are not an idiot and want to understand what capitalism is......

https://www.sammyboy.com/threads/from-100-to-1m-in-90-days.292753/
 
Last edited:
only idiots support capitalism like the idiots who support PAP.........people who support socialism knows whats good for them,is good for the gander.

capitalism only serves to extract wealth from the masses and channel them to the hands of a few,socialism is for the good of all......just like the good old pledge of Singapore which in the 21st century is just an aspiration.....


refer to this thread and read it carefully from top to bottom if u are not an idiot and want to understand what capitalism is......

https://www.sammyboy.com/threads/from-100-to-1m-in-90-days.

Only lazy crooks support socialism that rob all hard working people. That's why no socialist country can ever last long and always ends up in ruins.
 
Only lazy crooks support socialism that rob all hard working people. That's why no socialist country can ever last long and always ends up in ruins.

agree we should all give our money to the rich......

poor giving money to the rich= capitalism= good..........giving money to the poor = socialism= bad.
 
The socialism of the Incas
14
By Alberto Mingardi
Before the Mont Pelerin Society’s meeting in Lima, Peru, beautifully organized by Enrique Ghersi, I took three days off and visited Cuzco and Machu Picchu. As a matter of fact, I highly recommend the trip–though I’d suggest you take more than three days, as these are phenomenal places, well worthy of a longer stay.
Before taking my trip, I didn’t know anything about the Incas. But my tour guides (I had three: one for Cuzco, one for Ollantaytambo–my favourite spot–and one for Machu Picchu) were very generous with information, including on the Incas’ political arrangements.
It is difficult not to be impressed by the Incas’ engineering successes, and one wonders how many human lives these places should have cost. Building entire cities on mountain sides is not an easy job.
All the tour guides made a point of telling the other tourists and me that the Incas’ society did not know private property, nor greed.


I ran across an interesting book by Louis Baudin, “A Socialist Empire. The Incas of Peru“, that Ludwig von Mises very much liked, so much so that he wrote the preface to the English translation published by the Volker Fund. It is indeed a remarkable book.

My tour guides maintained that everybody, in the Inca times, worked “for the community”, so class divisions didn’t matter at all: the best and brightest were chosen to lead, the others were to supply manual labour, and everybody was happy because everything was “for the good of the community”. This seems to be what impressed them the most. The guides (all Peruvians) were quite fond of the notion of the Incas being a remarkably ‘horizontal’ society, in which people contributed to the common good due to their civic spirit and not because they were coerced by an all-powerful leadership.

Baudin has an interesting explanation of the Incas’ socialism being a mixture of historically evolved communal agriculture, and top-down socialism that took over later in time (“we must envisage the Indian tribes as forming a series of communities upon which the Incas imposed the framework of a socialist organization”). For this reason, his work seems to support my tour guides’ enthusiasm, as he writes that “the empire presented the curious spectacle of a civilization that remained hostile to the division of labor.” Lower class people were encouraged to be versatile, so to say.

But Baudin emphasizes the great gulf that existed between the elites and common people. He considered the Inca empire “a socialism that would have leveled existence to a complete and suffocating uniformity had it not been for an elite (…) Equality, in Peru, existed only between individuals of the same social rank; it was the military system of equality among soldiers.”
 
agree we should all give our money to the rich......

poor giving money to the rich= capitalism= good..........giving money to the poor = socialism= bad.

That is why you are still a retard. Only socialism gives money to the rich and rob the poor. Capitalism exchange with willing parties on the benefits that fit both parties.
 
enrGNOf.jpg
 
That is why you are still a retard. Only socialism gives money to the rich and rob the poor. Capitalism exchange with willing parties on the benefits that fit both parties.

socialism eats the rich.

willing parties,L.M.A.O.......if u create circumstances where one party is desperate enough they can be "willing" parties too.like banglas working for $2 an hour,or ur mother and daughter working as maid and geylang street walkers.

poverty creates disempowerment and disenfranchisement and creates exploitation

thats why capitalism requires that majority of the participants to remain poor.how can everyone be millionaires?or even comfortably well off?

in order for one to be rich,many must die or suffer.
 
Last edited:
socialism eats the rich.

willing parties,L.M.A.O.......if u create circumstances where one party is desperate enough they can be "willing" parties too.like banglas working for $2 an hour,or ur mother and daughter working as maid and geylang street walkers.

poverty creates disempowerment and disenfranchisement and creates exploitation

thats why capitalism requires that majority of the participants to remain poor.how can everyone be millionaires?or even comfortably well off?

in order for one to be rich,many must die or suffer.

That is why you are the useful idiots for the those in power in socialist countries. You don't even know what is capitalism and what is socialism. Now wonder retards like you thinking you have no choice in capitalist world because only fools think you have to buy something you don't need and buy something you cannot afford when no one put a gun on your head and force you to buy.
 
Back
Top