Case 1:
Yang and Hong vs Peasantpore Bapoks.
It seems that Yang and Hong have problems with female peasants going at each other without penetrative sex. With crazed Thio, they managed to hijack a NGO to pursue their clandestine affair of punishing bapoks who somehow depends on that 'taken' NGO for some assistance. They were largely ignored by the regime until the bapoks took to arms with liberal peasants drawn into the fray. Finally WKS got into the game and kindly requested the anglican head honcho to 'order' Yang and Hong back to the pulpit.
Case 2:
Ronny vs Asian far east Pagans
Ronny had free publicity and free tea (thank you ISD) for his 'O' level understanding of comparative religion.
Does two case imply the regime have higher tolerance for pastors who have the problems of opening their mouths at the wrong time in front of the wrong audience. It may appear so, the regime were less pleased with three school boys for there foolish comments but appear to give pastors some leeway despite their non-rational rumblings at certain junctions. If it involves moslems, then the dynamics changed.
Case 3:
Ong Kian Cheong & Dorothy Chan Hien Leng vs Regime
Ong and Chan were two idiots and not pastors but deserved to be called idiots for sending offending materials to moslems. Given that Peasantpore is surrounded by Moslems and not bapoks, buddhists or taoists, the last group that you want to antagonize are moslems. This the primary reason why Ong and Chan must be taught a lesson in common sense by the regime.
Yang and Hong vs Peasantpore Bapoks.
It seems that Yang and Hong have problems with female peasants going at each other without penetrative sex. With crazed Thio, they managed to hijack a NGO to pursue their clandestine affair of punishing bapoks who somehow depends on that 'taken' NGO for some assistance. They were largely ignored by the regime until the bapoks took to arms with liberal peasants drawn into the fray. Finally WKS got into the game and kindly requested the anglican head honcho to 'order' Yang and Hong back to the pulpit.
Case 2:
Ronny vs Asian far east Pagans
Ronny had free publicity and free tea (thank you ISD) for his 'O' level understanding of comparative religion.
Does two case imply the regime have higher tolerance for pastors who have the problems of opening their mouths at the wrong time in front of the wrong audience. It may appear so, the regime were less pleased with three school boys for there foolish comments but appear to give pastors some leeway despite their non-rational rumblings at certain junctions. If it involves moslems, then the dynamics changed.
Case 3:
Ong Kian Cheong & Dorothy Chan Hien Leng vs Regime
Ong and Chan were two idiots and not pastors but deserved to be called idiots for sending offending materials to moslems. Given that Peasantpore is surrounded by Moslems and not bapoks, buddhists or taoists, the last group that you want to antagonize are moslems. This the primary reason why Ong and Chan must be taught a lesson in common sense by the regime.