Pros for rulers of Peasantpore.
i) Reliable source of levy and increased tax base.
ii) Promote significant consumption increase e.g. housing price hike that benefit public and private rent owners who contribute to tax coffers.
iii) Supply cheap labour to MNCs who simply love peasants who understand and follow headquarters' instructions. SMEs love cheap foreign talent due to their lower pay, humble demands and ability to work overtime for minimal pay.
iv) Undesirable foreign talents or cheap labour could be booted out of Peasantpore without resorting to lengthy show trials that usually impose ruinous fines on regime's embarrassing vocal dissenters.
v) Using newly minted PRs and peasants to label 'local peasants' as ungrateful and singing praises of regime's record as compared to other rent driven basket cases in SEA.
Cons for local peasants
i) Increased resource competition e.g. housing, education, jobs
ii) Decreased electoral leverage since regime could count on loyal new citizens during procedural elections
i) Reliable source of levy and increased tax base.
ii) Promote significant consumption increase e.g. housing price hike that benefit public and private rent owners who contribute to tax coffers.
iii) Supply cheap labour to MNCs who simply love peasants who understand and follow headquarters' instructions. SMEs love cheap foreign talent due to their lower pay, humble demands and ability to work overtime for minimal pay.
iv) Undesirable foreign talents or cheap labour could be booted out of Peasantpore without resorting to lengthy show trials that usually impose ruinous fines on regime's embarrassing vocal dissenters.
v) Using newly minted PRs and peasants to label 'local peasants' as ungrateful and singing praises of regime's record as compared to other rent driven basket cases in SEA.
Cons for local peasants
i) Increased resource competition e.g. housing, education, jobs
ii) Decreased electoral leverage since regime could count on loyal new citizens during procedural elections
Last edited: