• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Unrepentant South Korean activist jailed for 12 years for knife attack on US envoy

Rockaria

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
90
Points
0

Unrepentant South Korean activist jailed for 12 years for knife attack on US envoy


PUBLISHED : Friday, 11 September, 2015, 10:59am
UPDATED : Friday, 11 September, 2015, 10:59am

Agence France-Presse in Seoul

lippert1.jpg


South Korean political activist Kim Ki-Jong slashed US Ambassador Mark Lippert, saying he was the “symbolic” target of his opposition to annual US-South Korea military exercises. Photo: AFP

The man behind a shocking knife attack on the US ambassador to South Korea was convicted of attempted murder on Friday and sentenced to 12 years for an assault that left the envoy needing 80 stitches to a deep gash on his face.

Prosecutors had sought a 15-year sentence for Kim Ki-Jong, 56, who lunged at Mark Lippert with a paring knife during a breakfast function in Seoul in March.

In passing judgment, the Seoul Central District Court noted Kim had “shown no repentance, attempting to justify his actions throughout the trial”.

The public attack on the envoy of South Korea’s most important military and diplomatic ally – and dramatic TV footage of Lippert being rushed to hospital clutching his bloodied face – was shocking for a country where passionate political protest is common but acts of such extreme violence rare.

There was also a degree of shame and disquiet that a man with a record of violence against foreign envoys had been able to carry out such an assault.

lippert2.jpg


US Ambassador to South Korea Mark Lippert underwent two-and-a-half hours of surgery and needed 80 stitches in his face after the attack in March. Photo: AP

A maverick activist who was known to police, Kim had been handed a two-year suspended sentence in 2010 for hurling a rock at the then Japanese ambassador to Seoul.

The defendant, wearing a blue prison outfit, closed his eyes but showed little emotion as the court verdict was read out.

He was then taken from the court in a wheelchair he has been using as the result of a leg injury sustained while being tackled to the ground after the assault.

Under police questioning, Kim said Lippert was the “symbolic” target of his opposition to annual US-South Korea military exercises.

The joint drills always trigger a surge in tensions with the North and Kim argued they were responsible for blocking a resumption of inter-Korean dialogue.

While admitting the assault, Kim repeatedly denied any intent to kill the ambassador, insisting that his sole aim was to bring attention to his campaign against the military exercises.

The court acquitted Kim of separate charges filed under South Korea’s strict National Security Law that bans any act seen as aiding North Korea or promoting its ideology.

Kim has visited the North seven times and once tried to erect a memorial in Seoul to the late North Korean leader Kim Jong-il after his death in 2011.

North Korea rejected accusations that it might have been behind the attack on Lippert as a “vicious” smear campaign, although the official KCNA news agency described the assault as “just punishment” for Washington’s refusal to cancel the joint military drills.

Lippert underwent two-and-a-half hours of surgery after the attack. While there was no irreversible nerve damage to his face, a separate cut to his left hand had damaged the nerves of his little finger.

Putting the threat posed by North Korea to one side, South Korea has largely been untouched by the spectre of terrorism, domestic or external, and the assault led some to question whether it had become complacent in what can seem like an increasingly hostile world.



 
Back
Top