U.S. probes deaths for links to Monster energy drink
MARTINNE GELLER AND DAVID MORGAN, REUTERS
FIRST POSTED: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2012 09:17 AM EDT | UPDATED: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2012 03:57 PM EDT
Two cans of Monster Energy drink are pictured in this photo-illustration shot in Los Angeles Oct. 22,2012. REUTERS/Fred Prouser
NEW YORK/WASHINGTON - The U.S. Food and Drug Administration said on Monday that it was investigating reports of five deaths that may be associated with Monster Beverage Corp’s namesake energy drink, and the company’s shares fell more than 14%.
Monster is also being sued by the family of a 14-year-old Maryland girl with a heart condition who died after drinking two cans of its Monster energy drink in a 24-hour period.
Monster, the top-selling energy drink in the United States, said it does not believe its energy drink was “in any way responsible” for the girl’s death.
Still, the lawsuit and reports of other deaths could escalate calls from critics including two U.S. senators and the New York attorney general about the safety of the beverages and the way they are marketed.
The highly caffeinated drinks with aggressive-sounding names like Monster, Red Bull, Rockstar, AMP and Full Throttle are often associated with active or extreme sports, which makes them especially popular among young men.
They are the fastest-growing type of soft drink in the United States, with sales increasing 17% last year to about $9 billion, according to Beverage Digest.
With double-digit growth through the third quarter of 2012, Beverage Digest Editor John Sicher said he expects energy drink sales to exceed $10 billion this year. He declined to speculate about future growth.
“I don’t think they are going to ban energy drinks,” said Morningstar analyst Thomas Mullarkey. “The question arises whether or not it gives them more firepower for increased regulation.”
That could mean more extensive labeling requirements or age restrictions, Mullarkey said. He added that the headlines also made Monster a less attractive takeover target.
“This really reduces the likelihood that Coke would want to acquire Monster,” Mullarkey said. Sources told Reuters in April that the two companies had discussed a possible deal as recently as last year.
Coca-Cola Co already distributes a large portion of Monster’s drinks in the United States and in some international markets. Monster has a similar distribution deal with Anheuser-Busch InBev.
CONCERNS NOT NEW
The family of Anais Fournier sued Monster on Friday for failing to warn about the product’s dangers.
The lawsuit, filed in California Superior Court in Riverside, said that after drinking two 24-ounce cans of Monster Energy on consecutive days Fournier went into cardiac arrest. She was placed in an induced coma and died six days later on Dec. 23, 2011.
The lawsuit, filed by her parents, said Fournier died from “cardiac arrhythmia due to caffeine toxicity” that complicated an existing heart valve condition related to a disorder called Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.
The two drinks together contained 480 milligrams of caffeine, the equivalent of 14 12-ounce cans of Coca-Cola, according to the lawsuit.
A spokeswoman for the law firm representing the family did not return calls seeking comment.
“Monster is unaware of any fatality anywhere that has been caused by its drinks,” the company said in a statement, adding that it intended to vigorously defend itself against the lawsuit.
On Monday, FDA spokeswoman Shelly Burgess said the agency had received reports of five deaths and one heart attack that may be associated with the Monster energy drink from 2009 through June this year.
The FDA said it investigates any report of injury or death that it receives. The notices to the FDA’s adverse events database do not in themselves confirm a risk from a product.
Burgess said manufacturers are required to submit all reports on serious adverse events to the FDA within 15 days of receiving them, and that they are responsible for providing follow-up information that could shed light on their cause.
Last month, U.S. Senators Dick Durbin of Illinois and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut sent a letter to the FDA asking it to investigate the interaction of ingredients in energy drinks and the effect of the caffeine on children and adolescents. The letter followed a similar request from Durbin in April.
In July, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman issued subpoenas to three energy drink makers — Monster, PepsiCo Inc and Living Essentials LLC — seeking information on the companies’ marketing and advertising practices. PepsiCo makes the AMP energy drink, and Living Essentials makes 5-Hour Energy.
The combination of caffeine and alcohol came into the spotlight two years ago when a handful of college students were hospitalized for alcohol poisoning after drinking alcoholic energy drinks like Four Loko. Four Loko’s maker later removed the caffeine from the drinks.
Monster is the U.S. energy drink leader by volume with nearly 39% of the market, but Austria’s Red Bull has the highest share by revenue due to its premium price. Drinks owned by Coke and Pepsi have smaller shares.
Monster drinks are sold in the United States and Europe, and the company is rolling them out to Ecuador, Hong Kong, Japan, Macau and Slovenia. It said in August that it was planning more international launches next year.
The company had net sales of $592.6 million in the second quarter, ended on June 30.
Monster shares closed down 14.23% at $45.73 on the Nasdaq, making for a 42% decline since mid-June when one analyst downgraded the stock to “underperform”. The case is Crossland et al v. Monster Beverage Corp, California Superior Court, Riverside County, No. RIC1215551.
(Additional reporting by Dhanya Skariachan; Editing by Gerald E. McCormick)
