• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Traffic police to monitor more roads

metalslug

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://newpaper.asia1.com.sg/news/story/0,4136,179873,00.html?

TRAFFIC POLICE TO MONITOR MORE ROADS
Slow down, speedsters. Cops have their 'eyes' on you
By Zaihan Mohamed Yusof

October 13, 2008

MOTORISTS tempted to emulate Formula One drivers be warned.

The Traffic Police are stepping up efforts to record speed demons with laser cameras. And those caught breaking the speed limit can expect to get demerit points and stiff fines.

More roads are now monitored to combat speeding.


In its latest move to deter speedsters, the Traffic police have made public on its website (www.spf.gov.sg/abtspf/tp.htm) all 38 possible locations where they may deploy the speed cameras.

At these locations, which have been updated since June, Traffic police officers with hand-held laser speed cameras can be spotted pointing their cameras at traffic.

But don't try to outsmart the cops even if you can memorise all the spots, because since the enforcement unit is mobile, they can change locations without notice.

For one F1 fan and car enthusiast, the enforcement may appear a dampener, especially after the buzz surrounding Singapore's historical night ace.

Said Mr P H Tan, 35: 'TP (traffic police) have warned drivers where they may set up (their speed cameras). But when they reveal PIE (Pan-Island Expressway) or AYE (Ayer Rajah Expressway) it's vague.

'The expressways are so long. How can we ever anticipate where the speed trap will be on the expressway?'

Snapped and fined

Two weeks ago, Mr Tan, a businessman who has owned fast cars, including a Ferrari, was caught on camera driving at about 85kmh in a 60kmh zone on Hougang Avenue 3 - one of the camera locations.

He was fined $170 and given eight demerit points.

Mr Tan said: 'It was early Sunday morning and traffic was light. I didn't expect to see a TP officer on the overhead bridge. If I had known, I would have definitely slowed down.'

Mr Tan said sports car engines can build up carbon deposits if they are driven slowly for too long.

On the expressways, especially after passing a speed camera, Mr Tan said he would do what many other drivers often do - speed up.

He said: 'The coast is clear, so why slow down? You need to blast in order to flush the carbon in your engine. Looking out for camera deployments can be stressful when you're driving.'

It's precisely drivers like Mr Tan that new rider Fazal N, 33, is concerned about.

Mr Fazal, who got his 2B motorcycle licence in July, is all for deploying more laser speed cameras.

'As a new rider, I have been tailgated by faster cars, which were definitely travelling above the speed limit. They have no respect for riders like me,' he said. 'More speed cameras will only deter speedsters.'

Mr Fazal is also upset about the drastic drop in speed whenever motorists spot a traffic cop holding a speed camera.

Mr Fazal added: 'You will suddenly see brake lights flashing and everybody dropping their speed to 50 or 60kmh on the expressway. I think this sudden slowing down is dangerous to other motorists behind.

'I'm not bothered if the TP points his camera at me because I know I don't ride like a mad man.'

Speed limit ignored

At other locations, like the turn into Bedok North Road from the PIE towards the airport, drivers ignore the 50kmh speed limit.

A speed display, on trial by the Land Transport Authority, show some drivers cornering at 90kmh.

When deployment locations are highlighted on a Singapore map, it would seem that most major roads are being monitored by the traffic cops.

Perhaps, rightly so.

The total figure of speeding summonses in 2007 was 56,067, up 24 per cent from 45,130 in 2006.

Speed had also been a factor in 1,766 fatalities or injuries on the road last year.

But has the F1 race led to any increase in speeding on Singapore streets?

Mr Tan Teng Lip, president of Singapore Motor Sports Association, felt motorists were unlikely to be encouraged to 'take speed to the streets'.

'I don't recall any studies or stories linking motor sport with an increase in illegal racing on the roads,' he said.

'With or without motor racing events, people who want to race illegally on our streets will do so. But there are laws in place to penalise these inconsiderate motorists.'

He said there was a time when illegal drag racing was rampant in Lim Chu Kang.

Today, such activities are rare. All thanks to the vigilant enforcement by TP.

Adding more officers with speed cameras on the road will only keep speedsters in check, he said.

However, with regard to the deployment of laser speed cameras, he wondered if there is a 'buffer zone' for motorists.

'The question is how strictly will the authorities enforce the speed limit? Is there a buffer of several kmh before the traffic police book you?

'Sometimes we go a little over the limit without being aware of it.'
 

metalslug

Alfrescian
Loyal
Comment

http://newpaper.asia1.com.sg/news/story/0,4136,179872,00.html?

COMMENT
Why I like speed cameras
By Zaihan Mohamed Yusof

October 13, 2008


WHAT'S the big fuss with having more portable speed cameras trailing vehicles on the road?



If you have not been speeding, you will not be booked by traffic cops.


The truth is, most law-abiding motorists will not be affected by the increased surveillance.


And the authorities are not being 'sneaky'. They have been up front with speed camera locations.


The locations are clearly stated on the traffic police website.


You get fair warning on the road too.


Riding on the PIE or AYE in the mornings, you get 'early warning' that up ahead a speed camera is possibly being used.


Traffic slows down or maintains just near the speed limit.


The same reaction is displayed by motorists whenever a traffic police car or Land Transport Authority bike is parked on the road shoulder.


Warning signs


Aside from speed limit signs, there are signs in blue these days stating 'Camera Zone'.


You're supposed to be on your best behaviour not only in these zones, but on all stretches of road in general.


Still, motorists can be seen treating our roads like a street circuit.


Examples of particular locations where one can observe this are aplenty.


But I have two personal favourites.


One is exit 8A on the airport bound Pan Island Expressway towards Bedok North Road.


A digital board in the corner displays a motorist's current speed prior to making a right turn.


Often motorists ignore the 50kmh limit and take the turn at higher speeds.


Another example is the loop connecting the Kranji Expressway to the Bukit Timah Expressway in the direction of the city.


Damaged guard rails and broken vehicle parts left behind tell a story of dangerous speedsters.


I travel this stretch of road daily - rain or shine.


If you follow the 50kmh limit, there's no way you could possibly lose control of your vehicle.


Until you've been close to getting hit byspeeding motorists, you will not understand how important hand-held speed cameras are.


These are psychological speed limiters.


Too close for comfort


I'm tired of seeing headlamps up close in my motorcycle rear view mirrors.


The funny thing is I'm riding close to the 90kmh speed limit (plus or minus 5kmh) and I'm still being tailgated in the middle lane of the expressway.


Yes, sometimes it is frustrating snailing along even when you know your vehicle is more at home at three-figure speeds.


But rules are in place to make road-use safe for everyone.


Since 2005, many Singapore roads have received an increase in speed limits allowing for better and faster traffic flow.


On average, most roads have seen a 10kmh increase in speed limit.


But if you want to go faster, save it for the race circuit, not our roads.


Laser speed cameras should not be a concern to motorists.


We just need to keep our eyes on the road and occasionally glance at our speedometers, not scan overhead bridges or road shoulders for speed cameras.
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
TRAFFIC POLICE TO MONITOR MORE ROADS
Slow down, speedsters. Cops have their 'eyes' on you
By Zaihan Mohamed Yusof

honestly, it isn't the speed that kills, it is the sudden deceleration that does people in.

to keep the traffic smooth, the TP should keep slow-moving vehicles from spilling onto lanes 1 & 2 of the highway! and take off the speed limit on lane 1, keeping it purely for overtaking. that should be the way to go.

keeping 70km/h in the KPE is a pain in the arse too, drivers have to keep their eyes on their speedometer rather than keeping their eyes on the road conditions!
 

sunny302

Alfrescian
Loyal
Do they really have to resort to this:mad:

This Urban Jungle
Posted on 13 Oct, 2008 10:22
TP stoops so low to catch traffic offenders

getArticlePhoto.do


getMediumSizePhoto.do


Despite this Traffic Police officer's efforts to lay low, a STOMPer managed to spot the officer with a speed camera mounted on an overhead bridge near the Singapore Expo Hall.

The STOMPer jokes that the Traffic Police now has to "stoop" low to catch speeding drivers on camera.

The STOMPer says in an e-mail dated October 12:

"Overhead bridge at Singapore Expo – a favorite hideout for the traffic police (TP). But now, they stoop so low you cannot even see them from afar".
 

myjohnson

Alfrescian
Loyal
Had anyone wondered why the times when you were driving with your speedometer reading 100kph on a speed limit of 90kph road in the middle lane and the traffic police zoomed pass you without so much as a glance in your direction?

That is because all speedometers are manufactured to read about 10% optimistic to your actual speed. So when your speedometer reads 100kph, your actual speed is about 89 to 91kph. It is suppose to be a safety add in design to deter drivers from exceeding the speed limit without having to glance at the speedometer every 5 seconds.

The Traffic Police had put on record that you can exceed the speed limit by 10kph when you are overtaking which is plain common sense as you can't overtake another vehicle while maintaining the same speed. Please use my info with common sense as well as driving with full concentration and it should keep you and your family from coming to grief. Good luck. Just in case you are wondering, I've gone without incurring a single demerit point for the past 14 years despite being on the roads a fair 4 hours a day.
 

SIFU

Alfrescian
Loyal
SPF were told to buck up and increase their revenue..

otherwise their KPI would be far from SPower..:biggrin:
 

Cestbon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Sneaky sneaky! I really hate those with laser gun. Why the don't catch road hogger?
 

2standards

Alfrescian
Loyal
'The question is how strictly will the authorities enforce the speed limit? Is there a buffer of several kmh before the traffic police book you? Depends on the quota set by TP.:smile:


Slow protest against speed traps

By Ben Whitford

Drivers claim speed cameras are being used as a 'stealth tax'
Anti-speed camera protesters are calling for motorists to "drive like a vicar" for the month of February.
The Starve the Cameras campaign asks people to drive "religiously" within the speed limit - to reduce government revenue from speeding fines.

Organiser Neil Fedorowycz says the campaign website has received tens of thousands of visitors.

He aims to recruit 10 per cent of all drivers to what he says is "a unique social experiment".

Stealth tax

"It's protest by compliance," he told BBC News Online. "There shouldn't be a political party out there that doesn't support this."

The campaign website encourages drivers to "get into the habit of driving within the speed limit" in "a concerted effort to starve the speed cameras of income from fines".

CAUGHT ON CAMERA

In 2003 over 1m drivers were caught speeding
Fines raised around £72m for the Treasury last year
4,500 speed cameras are currently in use around the UK

The group predicts 3m speeding fines will be issued in 2004 and says they constitute "a stealth tax".

"This is scandalous. It's time for drivers to fight back," the campaign says.

Mr Fedorowycz said the response had been overwhelmingly positive: "In the first day I had 500 people register on the site."

Since starting in mid-January the campaign site had received "tens of thousands" of visitors, he said.

The campaign plans to compare road safety and speeding ticket statistics for February with figures for the preceding 12 months, although Mr Fedorowycz admitted: "If accidents plummet as a result we'll have to accept the road safety people were right."

"It's difficult driving like a vicar," he said. "But if people can do it we can make a difference."

Saving lives

The campaign has so far met with a lukewarm response from the Department for Transport.

A spokeswoman said: "Cameras aren't about raising money, they're about saving lives."

"As we've always said, we look forward to a day when not a single speeding ticket is issued," she said.

"We don't want your money, we just want you to slow down









http://newpaper.asia1.com.sg/news/story/0,4136,179873,00.html?

TRAFFIC POLICE TO MONITOR MORE ROADS
Slow down, speedsters. Cops have their 'eyes' on you
By Zaihan Mohamed Yusof
 

2standards

Alfrescian
Loyal
"Police Commissioner Mal Hyde announced last year police were considering lowering the secret margin for error, given to speeding drivers.

New lower speed tolerance limits were introduced in December but Mr Hyde has refused to reveal the limit because it would allow drivers to speed. He did cite the Victorian limit of 3km/h.

Last night, a spokeswoman for Mr Hyde said speed detection devices were lawfully calibrated, and she reiterated the tolerance limit would not be revealed."

What is the accuracy of TP's speed gun? :smile:



South Australian speed traps catch 100,000 extra driversArticle from: Font size: Decrease Increase Email article: Email Print article: Print Submit comment: Submit comment MICHAEL OWEN, POLITICAL REPORTER
June 20, 2008 12:30am
DRIVERS fined for speeding between 60 and 69km/h have risen from 1515 in 2002 to more than 100,800 last year - an MP branding them 'cash cow' revenue raisers.

In a further dramatic surge, the number of fines issued by police in the 60 to 69km/h speed range jumped from 76,536 in 2006 to 100,866 last year.
Official figures show that, overall, more than 1.38 million people have been fined a total of more than $200 million for speeding since 2002, when the Rann Labor Government came to power.

The figures were tabled in Parliament after a question from Opposition transport spokesman Duncan McFetridge, who last night said it "showed the Government was using motorists as cash cows".

But Treasurer Kevin Foley said it was "offensive to suggest that our motivation for making our roads safer is to raise revenue – it is to save lives".

Dr McFetridge said the figures raised serious questions about the accuracy of police speed detection devices, and the motivation behind lowering speed tolerance levels.

"Uncertainty over the accuracy of the SA Police speed cameras and laser guns is causing potentially thousands of motorists to be unfairly fined," he said.

"Police need to come clean and tell motorists about lowering speeding tolerances to catch more drivers.

"Motorists caught inadvertently driving one or 2km/h over the limit are not the same as drivers who deliberately endanger lives with their reckless behaviour on the road."

Police Commissioner Mal Hyde announced last year police were considering lowering the secret margin for error, given to speeding drivers.

New lower speed tolerance limits were introduced in December but Mr Hyde has refused to reveal the limit because it would allow drivers to speed. He did cite the Victorian limit of 3km/h.

Last night, a spokeswoman for Mr Hyde said speed detection devices were lawfully calibrated, and she reiterated the tolerance limit would not be revealed.

The spokeswoman said there had been a significant increase in the number of speed detection devices deployed by the police since 2002.

The data released by the Government is broken down for the past six calendar years by speed range and the total number and value of fines issued.

It shows the number of speeding fines has increased by 38 per cent since 2002, while revenue from expiation notices over the same period has gone up by 70 per cent. There was a total of 197,404 speeding fines issued in 2002, costing motorists in that year $25.24 million.

During 2007, the total number of speeding fines issued increased to 272,519, raising an annual revenue of $42.94 million.

From July 1, speeding fines will increase by about 3.5 per cent. Speeding fines from next month will range from $182 for those caught driving less than 15km/h above the speed limit to $435 for those driving more than 30km/h over the limit.

Mr Foley said the rise in the number of fines was linked to "the default urban speed limit being reduced" in March, 2003, from 60 to 50km/h.

"Police exercised a three-month amnesty period for speed enforcement on 50km/h roads from March 1, 2003," he said.

Mr Foley pointed to the latest findings by the Centre for Automotive Safety Research, which showed a 23 per cent reduction in casualty crashes on roads where the speed limit was reduced from 60 to 50km/h.

He said it was State Government policy that all revenue raised was "dedicated to enhance road safety".

Mr Foley also said in 2002 there were 154 fatalities on SA roads, compared with 125 last year – a fall of more than 18 per cent.

But Dr McFetridge said the continuing reduction in road fatalities "cannot be attributed to the single decision to ping drivers doing 60 to 69km/h".

"Where is the evidence of the impact of that multimillion-dollar revenue raising decision?," Dr McFetridge said.

"Treasurer Kevin Foley has drained more than $200 million from the wallets of motorists during the past six years. "He has used motorists as cash cows."

Mr Foley said the Government had created a Community Road Safety Fund, to provide "transparency in relation to income from speed detection devices".



Had anyone wondered why the times when you were driving with your speedometer reading 100kph on a speed limit of 90kph road in the middle lane and the traffic police zoomed pass you without so much as a glance in your direction?
 

NissanViP

Alfrescian
Loyal
Traffic Police fucker should focus ROAD HOGGER on LANE 1 that have caused massive slowdown.

Those fuck-driver thought it is their right and within the law to keep LANE 1 at 90 Km/h, in fact the rule and the law said, it is for overtaking and emergency vehicle only. The law did not mention that motorist can keep (Road Hog) extremely right lane.

Traffic Police fucker also should focus on those with "G", "Y" & "C" plates hogging on LANE 2.

All they (TP-fucker) care is about speeding only but to acknowledge that road hogger can cause accident as well.

FUCK YOU REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE TRAFFIC POLICE DIVISION, I pray and curse all traffic police personnel to meet a FATAL accident by those ROAD HOGGER & Heavy Vehicles.






 

DIVISION1

Alfrescian
Loyal
Drive responsibly. A moment of thrill may cost you, your loved ones and other innocent people lives. Do the right thing.
 

myjohnson

Alfrescian
Loyal
As long as they keep turning a blind eye to the abuse by private ambulances, road hoggers can feel vindicated on moral grounds!
 
Top