• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Tiwary's family may be very rich but judges are not blind, he's a goner !

pachinko

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 9, 2008
Messages
300
Points
28
Even if his family is wealthy will not bail him out of his crime, his "twist and turn" alibi is consistent with his character . A thief will never admit he has stolen unless proven ....with cctv , circumstantial evidence etc.

His relative also confirmed in court that Tiwary has a fiery temper and is capable of what he is accused of, the public will not know such important information unless family members who know him tell them about it.

From his looks , he obviously come from a high class background and one can even sense his arrogance .......we shall see how the re-trial judges decide , justice will previal , not all human beings will compromise their positions.
 
If this Ah Neh is from a $RICH$ family he wouldn't have rental problem in the first place...

On Monday, however, the prosecution in the case said it would show beyond a reasonable doubt that Tiwary murdered Tan and Tay, and that the issue of rental for the apartment he shared with the two students was at the centre of the case.

Crown Prosecutor John Kiely alleged that Tiwary had not been paying his share of the rent of the suburban Barker Street apartment where the men lived, going by notes found in Mr Tay's handwriting. The notes stated outstanding sums owed by Tiwary.

Mr Tay had been in charge of settling the A$2,172.60 (S$2,640) rent each month, before collecting his housemates' share. However, Mr Tan and Mr Tay were due to complete their studies and return to Singapore at the end of the semester, leaving Tiwary in the 'stressful situation' of taking on the rent himself, said Mr Kiely. He added: 'There were no more time-outs.'
 
Even if his family is wealthy will not bail him out of his crime, his "twist and turn" alibi is consistent with his character . A thief will never admit he has stolen unless proven ....with cctv , circumstantial evidence etc.

His relative also confirmed in court that Tiwary has a fiery temper and is capable of what he is accused of, the public will not know such important information unless family members who know him tell them about it.

From his looks , he obviously come from a high class background and one can even sense his arrogance .......we shall see how the re-trial judges decide , justice will previal , not all human beings will compromise their positions.
And if he is acquitted, he will probably be returning to SG right?
 
He was an SAF scholar who was late in rent. I dont think hes from a rich family.
 
Back
Top