• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Three NMP hopefuls come under fire

metalslug

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/429114/1/.html

Three NMP hopefuls come under fire
By Leong Wee Keat, TODAY | Posted: 14 May 2009 0738 hrs

phprRKZpt.jpg

Photos 1 of 1

Loretta Chen - from TODAY

Related News

• Analysis: Time to tweak NMP nomination process

• NMP applications close








SINGAPORE: Barely had they thrown their names into the hat for the post of Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) when the criticisms began on the government feedback website, REACH.

NMP hopefuls Loretta Chen and Beatrice Chia-Richmond – along with incumbent Siew Kum Hong, who is seeking a second term – have been accused of being "homosexuality activists" by some Netizens.

Postings on REACH questioned if their applications, in the words of one, were "a back door for more pro-LGBTs (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender)" to have a voice in Parliament. The debate has set REACH's thread on NMP candidates abuzz.

First opened for comments on May 1, the thread picked up steam since last Thursday and has attracted 93 postings and more than 1,400 page views as of last night. In comparison, the thread on Influenza A (H1N1) has attracted eight comments.

With his role as a legal adviser in the recent AWARE leadership saga, Mr Siew, 34, bore the brunt of the criticisms; many accused him of "pushing homosexual lifestyle" and of being "against the majority Singaporean".

On the other hand, Ms Chia-Richmond, 34, and Ms Chen, 32, both arts practitioners, came under fire for their past projects, which forumer 'Very Worried!!' alleged about Ms Chia-Richmond's application "is far more serious and worrying than Siew Kum Hong being re-nominated".

Ms Chen, a theatre director, has been charged as being "no different". "She's openly gay and has also directed films with mainly controversial themes," wrote forumer 'isay'.

When asked about this, Ms Chen said, "I am who I am and I don't intend to pretend to be someone that I am not. If you can be honest to yourself, you can then be honest to the team you are leading and only then you can be honest to society at large."

Ms Chen, who hopes to speak up on arts, youth and elderly issues, added, "I don't see this NMP as a backdoor (for LGBT issues). Human beings are capable of being multi-dimensional, multi-perspective and multi-layered. I think it's sad when some Singaporeans choose to be so single-minded and so single-focused that you can only be defined by your sexuality or by your race or your religion."

Ms Chia, who is married and a mother of one, could not be reached for comment last night.

When contacted, Mr Siew said he had not seen the full comments posted on REACH, but has seen similar objections to his re-application online. He also received several emails.

"It seems there's some effort to organise a campaign to target me," he said. "It does bother me to be a target, to be singled out for expressing a sincerely held opinion."

Mr Siew, who is married and is a corporate lawyer, reiterated that he does not support homosexuality but is rather against discrimination, which is why he sought to repeal the law against gay sex in 2007.

The criticisms on REACH is another sign that the two camps – those with concerns over the gay agenda and those seeking more equality for gays – are turning to "mainstream portals" as their sounding boards, according to Singapore Management University assistant professor Eugene Tan.

"The two groups are fairly educated and are not afraid to use the new media to draw and canvass for support," he said.

Feedback on REACH is typically passed to the relevant agencies.

But Mr Siew hopes the Special Select Committee of eight MPs will evaluate his record in Parliament, which he feels "speaks for itself" as he had spoken out on numerous topics.

"The only thing I hope is that rational minds will prevail," he added.

The panel, led by Speaker Abdullah Tarmugi, will make its recommendations to President SR Nathan after it has interviewed the candidates. The new NMP term begins in July.


- TODAY/so
 

denzuko1

Alfrescian
Loyal
NMP position is very important since we are lacking in "competence" oppositions in the parliament. We really need careful selection of NMPs to make sure that the job is properly done.

I agree with many that Mr Siew hae not prove himself as an effective NMP. He has not really succeed in many issues that he has champions. This is especially illustrated in his reppeal of the 377A and his not so competence in the Aware saga.

I would think another person a more fitted character for the job. Thio Su Mein should be the right person to take the chair, she has succeeded where Mr Siew has failed:

1) As a Feminist Mentor, she has taught women to bring out their internal instincts. To be feminine you need not be righteous. You can do anything wrong for the right reason. Her contribution is great especially in the Aware saga. She has managed to bring out the masculinity hidden within each and every female.

2) She is an effective marketeer in growth, she has succeeded where the old guard has failed. For years, Aware's membership has been dwindling to a danger level of 300. Within a span of 1 month, she managed to help Aware grow from 300 to 3,000! This is an impressive result. Not only that, she has brought back the passion and unity of its members which was thought to be lost. The members unity at EOGM is a clear sign of her effort.

3) She has managed to change the direction of Aware in very short time frame. Aware has been a secular organization focus on woman's issue. She has turned Aware into a Pro-Gay organization over night, and to date the Gay's membership has increased from almost zero to unknown level! Now more than ever, Aware will focus more on Gay issue.

4) Contrary to Mr Wong's comment, Ms Thio has managed to sway MOE from Neutral to Pro-Gay and pro-pre-marital sex through her re-interpretation of the CSE Guide. No longer Neutral means neutral but now Neutral means aggressive promotion of Gay, homosexuality and pre-marital sex is GOOD. Not to mention that Virginity can now be thrown away if you don't like it. Mr Siew failed to do so.

5) Her moves on Aware has definitely woke up the minds of Homosexuals and Gays. No longer will they be hiding in a corner, they are now more open in identifying themselves as gays and homosexuals, and proud to do so. They no longer afraid of prosecution and they can lift their heads up.

6) Her mobilization of a team to execute the take over has also shown her to be strategic, organized and wide in network. With her voted in, you are not just getting in a single person, but a team which will function more effectively. It might even be due to this team that she has formed that point 1-5 has made possible.

I solute Ms Thio for her work and contribution to improve the acceptance of the Gay community of Singapore. She has the quality to make sure the job is properly done. She is 10 times much better than the three NMP mentioned.
 
Top