• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Thomson Medical fined $20,000 for IVF mix-up

T

Taigong Wang

Guest

Jun 21, 2011

Thomson Medical fined $20,000 for IVF mix-up

By Elena Chong

tmc.chew-seng-kim.jpg


Thomson Medical Centre - was slapped with the maximum $20,000 fine on Tuesday over lapses in its assisted reproduction services. -- ST PHOTO: CHEW SENG KIM

THOMSON Medical - formerly known as Thomson Medical Centre - was slapped with the maximum $20,000 fine on Tuesday over lapses in its assisted reproduction services.

A representative of the company pleaded guilty on its behalf to failing to comply with directives to ensure that suitable practices were used to carry out such activities.

As a result of the lapses on Jan 23 2010, an IVF mix-up occurred with the birth of a baby born last October, whose DNA did not match its father's.

The court heard that the centre had processed two semen specimens at the same time, and failed to throw away disposable pipettes which are thin suction tubes used in a laboratory for handling small quantities of liquid.


The Ministry of Health suspended the centre's assisted reproduction services from providing fresh cycles in November 2010. The suspension is under review. Senior Counsel Lok Vi Ming said his client had received numerous awards and accolades over the years.

It was the first private hospital to set up IVF. Over 5,000 couples have been treated and more than 1,000 babies born.

District Judge Sarjit Singh agreed with the prosecution that the maximum fine was appropriate in this case in view of the gravity of the offence, and the irreversible and far-reaching consequences of the breach.

'A very large degree of care is absolutely necessary in assisted reproduction to ensure confidence among couples who seek such treatment. In this regard, the defendant failed in its duty,' he said.


 
Top