• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

This website losing readers?

metalslug

Alfrescian
Loyal
This website losing readers?
Wednesday, 24 September 2008
Singapore Democrats

To: The Editor
Lianhe Zaobao
lianhezaobao.jpg


Your correspondent Ms You Lun Tian quoted National Solidarity Party member Mr Goh Meng Seng as saying: "Extremist viewpoints may draw the attention of people and garner the support of other extremists, but most web users will still want to hear balanced, moderate, mature arguments. This is also the reason why the SDP website is rapidly losing its readers." (Lianhe Zaobao, 20 Sep 08)

There is certainly an effort to try to paint the Singapore Democrats as extremists. The SDP makes no apology for challenging the present political system and, more importantly, working to reform it.

Our objective is to ensure that the PAP Government respects democratic principles as enshrined in our Constitution. These principles include the freedoms of speech, association and assembly.

The actions of the SDP and other pro-democracy activists, which included the use of civil disobedience, have led to the opening up of Speakers' Corner for demonstrations, albeit in a very limited way. The Government has, belatedly, acknowledged the necessity of protests.

Freedoms of speech and assembly is the bread and butter of democratic politics. Without them, there is no democracy. Only in autocratic systems are such freedoms and the exercise of them considered extreme.

On the point about the SDP website losing readers, we'll let the statistics speak for themselves:

Between 20 June and 20 September 2008, global traffic rank of the SDP website, according to the Alexa website, rose by 194,650 positions putting us at position number 337,797.

PAP has the second highest position for Singapore's political parties, coming in at a distant 1,286,895.

Within Singapore, the SDP's traffic rank is 2,429. Again, PAP comes in second but only at position 7,266.

During this period, the number of users visiting our site saw a 51 percent increase. This compares to only 2 percent for the PAP website. This figure for the SDP may have dropped slightly in recent days due to our website being down for a couple of days.

Not only are there more visitors, our readers are also spending more time reading our posts. The number of pages viewed per day per user increased by 31 percent. For a similar period, the figure for the PAP's website recorded a minus 27 percent!

In June, our website crashed because of the surge in the number of visitors. Since then, according to our own statistics, we have seen at least a tripling in the number of visitors.

We don't think these figures point to the SDP "rapidly losing its readers," do you?

If anything, they support the view that "most web users will still want to hear balanced, moderate, mature arguments." And that's what the SDP intends to continue doing on our website.

John L Tan
Assistant Secretary-General
Singapore Democratic Party
 
A

Alu862

Guest
The actions of the SDP and other pro-democracy activists, which included the use of civil disobedience, have led to the opening up of Speakers' Corner for demonstrations

SDP doing ?
 

Darkcloud

Alfrescian
Loyal
"If anything, they support the view that "most web users will still want to hear balanced, moderate, mature arguments." And that's what the SDP intends to continue doing on our website."

SDP "balanced, moderate, mature"?

LOL! No wonder they don't know what's going on around them. They live in their own world.
 
Z

Zombie

Guest
The actions of the SDP and other pro-democracy activists, which included the use of civil disobedience, have led to the opening up of Speakers' Corner for demonstrations

SDP doing ?

What a way to link things together.
Next time prisons get renovated, they can say it is because their members stayed there before? :confused:
 
A

Alu862

Guest
"If anything, they support the view that "most web users will still want to hear balanced, moderate, mature arguments." And that's what the SDP intends to continue doing on our website."

SDP "balanced, moderate, mature"?

LOL! No wonder they don't know what's going on around them. They live in their own world.

Exactly. Their website articles would fail in a GP or any academic paper. All they do is air dirty linen which we well know about. They have no policy evne on non monetary issues like defence
 

Avantas

Alfrescian
Loyal
John Tan is barking up the wrong tree.

He should be writing the letter to NSP CEC instead.

The wayang party blog has already exposed GMS as a charlatan here:

http://wayangparty.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/is-sdp-website-losing-readers-due-to-its-extremism/


This website losing readers?
Wednesday, 24 September 2008
Singapore Democrats

To: The Editor
Lianhe Zaobao
lianhezaobao.jpg


Your correspondent Ms You Lun Tian quoted National Solidarity Party member Mr Goh Meng Seng as saying: "Extremist viewpoints may draw the attention of people and garner the support of other extremists, but most web users will still want to hear balanced, moderate, mature arguments. This is also the reason why the SDP website is rapidly losing its readers." (Lianhe Zaobao, 20 Sep 08)

There is certainly an effort to try to paint the Singapore Democrats as extremists. The SDP makes no apology for challenging the present political system and, more importantly, working to reform it.

Our objective is to ensure that the PAP Government respects democratic principles as enshrined in our Constitution. These principles include the freedoms of speech, association and assembly.

The actions of the SDP and other pro-democracy activists, which included the use of civil disobedience, have led to the opening up of Speakers' Corner for demonstrations, albeit in a very limited way. The Government has, belatedly, acknowledged the necessity of protests.

Freedoms of speech and assembly is the bread and butter of democratic politics. Without them, there is no democracy. Only in autocratic systems are such freedoms and the exercise of them considered extreme.

On the point about the SDP website losing readers, we'll let the statistics speak for themselves:

Between 20 June and 20 September 2008, global traffic rank of the SDP website, according to the Alexa website, rose by 194,650 positions putting us at position number 337,797.

PAP has the second highest position for Singapore's political parties, coming in at a distant 1,286,895.

Within Singapore, the SDP's traffic rank is 2,429. Again, PAP comes in second but only at position 7,266.

During this period, the number of users visiting our site saw a 51 percent increase. This compares to only 2 percent for the PAP website. This figure for the SDP may have dropped slightly in recent days due to our website being down for a couple of days.

Not only are there more visitors, our readers are also spending more time reading our posts. The number of pages viewed per day per user increased by 31 percent. For a similar period, the figure for the PAP's website recorded a minus 27 percent!

In June, our website crashed because of the surge in the number of visitors. Since then, according to our own statistics, we have seen at least a tripling in the number of visitors.

We don't think these figures point to the SDP "rapidly losing its readers," do you?

If anything, they support the view that "most web users will still want to hear balanced, moderate, mature arguments." And that's what the SDP intends to continue doing on our website.

John L Tan
Assistant Secretary-General
Singapore Democratic Party
 

Porfirio Rubirosa

Alfrescian
Loyal
I must say that appears to be a bit rich coming from SDP:rolleyes:

PS Perhaps I can give them the "mature" bit but the other 2?

"If anything, they support the view that "most web users will still want to hear balanced, moderate, mature arguments." And that's what the SDP intends to continue doing on our website."

SDP "balanced, moderate, mature"?

LOL! No wonder they don't know what's going on around them. They live in their own world.
 

Porfirio Rubirosa

Alfrescian
Loyal
To be fair I think Dr Chee and SDP appear to have played a part in pushing the govt to open up more. How much, well that I do not know.

What a way to link things together.
Next time prisons get renovated, they can say it is because their members stayed there before? :confused:
 
A

Alu862

Guest
To be fair I think Dr Chee and SDP appear to have played a part in pushing the govt to open up more. How much, well that I do not know.

Don't attribute all success to thsi "no policies" party. If I may say, evne people like Alex Au have contributed more.
 

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
To be fair I think Dr Chee and SDP appear to have played a part in pushing the govt to open up more. How much, well that I do not know.

SDP n chee only confirmed what the gabramen accused about them: CLUELESS. this is a more subtle term. the more direct and nastier ones we already heard.
 

Wisely

Alfrescian
Loyal
What a way to link things together.
Next time prisons get renovated, they can say it is because their members stayed there before? :confused:


I feel uncomfortable when the SDP tries to take major credit for it. I sense the pressure to allow protests came when people wanted to protest again Myanmar govt. I don't think they want their action to be seen as "civil disobedience", but an expression of concern for a neighbour country.
 
Top