• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

This is America: one in eight go hungry

neddy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This is America: one in eight go hungry
November 17, 2009 - 2:35PM

The US Agriculture Department has released bleak figures on the state of hunger in the United States, showing that more American families are having difficulty feeding their members.

The annual Household Food Security report, released on Monday, showed that in 2008, families in 17 million households - 14.6 per cent of US homes - had difficulty putting enough food on the table at some point during the year, an 11 per cent increase over 2007.

The figures "represent the highest level observed since nationally representative food security surveys were initiated in 1995," the USDA said.

"The fundamental cause of food insecurity and hunger in the United States is poverty - marked by a lack of adequate resources to address basic needs such as food, shelter and health care," the statement added.

President Barack Obama described the report - which came as some 60 heads of state and government were attending the World Summit on Food Security in Rome.

- as "unsettling".

"This trend was already painfully clear in many communities across our nation, where food stamp applications are surging and food pantry shelves are emptying," Obama said.

The president said he was especially troubled that there were more than 500,000 US families "in which a child experienced hunger multiple times over the course of the year.

"Our children's ability to grow, learn, and meet their full potential - and therefore our future competitiveness as a nation - depends on regular access to healthy meals," he said.

The first task to reverse the trend of rising hunger "is to restore job growth, which will help relieve the economic pressures that make it difficult for parents to put a square meal on the table each day," Obama said.

The president also said his administration has increased help for low-income families seeking food assistance, especially those with children.

AFP
 

cass888

Alfrescian
Loyal
Wrong title. Seven in eight eat their fill.

This is America: one in eight go hungry
November 17, 2009 - 2:35PM

The US Agriculture Department has released bleak figures on the state of hunger in the United States, showing that more American families are having difficulty feeding their members.

The annual Household Food Security report, released on Monday, showed that in 2008, families in 17 million households - 14.6 per cent of US homes - had difficulty putting enough food on the table at some point during the year, an 11 per cent increase over 2007.

The figures "represent the highest level observed since nationally representative food security surveys were initiated in 1995," the USDA said.

"The fundamental cause of food insecurity and hunger in the United States is poverty - marked by a lack of adequate resources to address basic needs such as food, shelter and health care," the statement added.

President Barack Obama described the report - which came as some 60 heads of state and government were attending the World Summit on Food Security in Rome.

- as "unsettling".

"This trend was already painfully clear in many communities across our nation, where food stamp applications are surging and food pantry shelves are emptying," Obama said.

The president said he was especially troubled that there were more than 500,000 US families "in which a child experienced hunger multiple times over the course of the year.

"Our children's ability to grow, learn, and meet their full potential - and therefore our future competitiveness as a nation - depends on regular access to healthy meals," he said.

The first task to reverse the trend of rising hunger "is to restore job growth, which will help relieve the economic pressures that make it difficult for parents to put a square meal on the table each day," Obama said.

The president also said his administration has increased help for low-income families seeking food assistance, especially those with children.

AFP
 

neddy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Wrong title. Seven in eight eat their fill.

Evidence?

(The result of Singapore education, all jumping to conclusion)
(The result of privatisation and small government in favor of profit-maximising Too Big to Fail corporations is HUMAN SLAVERY - Anon)
 
Last edited:

TeeKee

Alfrescian
Loyal
Failures of capitalism or problems due to high Gini index?

Never mind there are 700 million Chinese still living in povety!
 

Ash007

Alfrescian
Loyal
Actually Anita Roddick, founder of the body shop, once said that to be poor in America is the worst thing that can happen to you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Roddick

http://www.anitaroddick.com/readmore.php?sid=3

To be poor anywhere is always hard, but poverty in America, in a land of such plenty, seems harder, shocking in its incongruity.

China maybe still have 700 million living in poverty, but don't forget that China over the past decade has actually decreases this by huge margin.

http://www.globalissues.org/article/4/poverty-around-the-world

While this at least sounds encouraging, it masks regional variations, and perhaps most glaringly the impact of China:

China’s poverty rate fell from 85% to 15.9%, or by over 600 million people
China accounts for nearly all the world’s reduction in poverty
Excluding China, poverty fell only by around 10%


Failures of capitalism or problems due to high Gini index?

Never mind there are 700 million Chinese still living in povety!
 

neddy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The problem with labour arises from the period in classical Europe. A time when slaves are permitted and the age of industralisation give rise to a superclass of rich landlords and industrial barons.

With classical economics forming the basis of modern economics, we remember Ricardo's Law of Rent which is influenced by another brit economist, Malthus. Ricardo do not bother with the underclass and therefore the distribution of wealth.

Malthus is the forerunner to today's birth control talk (remember PAP's 2 is Enough campaign). He believe that population control is the solution to poverty.

Anyway, to cut the story short, these 2 economists believe in classess. First, you have the landowners, followed by the capitalists and finally, the labourers.

A bit hard to explain in simple terms, but the applications of the economic theories of that age will ensure that labourers lose out because their work is not paid by the amount of effort put in, but how much this effort value add to the landlords' profit.

This got worse in modern time with automation. Automation is the single largest cause of labour unemployment - what we termed as structural unemployment.

MODERN Applications of classical economics is the cause of the high Gini index.
 
Top