• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

The Worst Cars of All Time

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The Worst Cars of All Time

The world has been a witness to many great cars. We’re talking Ferrari 250 GTO, Lamborghini Countach, Porsche 911, and so on, and so on.
You get the idea. They are the cars we all dream about, but only a few can actually afford.


However, history is also a witness to some truly atrocious automobiles. Cars which were a mistake from the factory, cars which were simply made to bring in profit or cars which were simply built badly because the manufacturer couldn’t care less.


pexels-photo-204605-4.jpg
 

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
1200px-Bricklin_SV-1_AMI-1024x753.jpg


You’d be forgiven for not knowing what the Bricklin is. You’re probably better of not knowing about its existence, but since you’re here, reading this article, let us explain. The Bricklin is a DeLorean DMC-12 imitation of sorts, but we don’t mean it in a good way. Designed as a supposed car of the future, its main feature, besides the hateful design were the 100-pound gullwing doors. SV1 stood for Safety Vehicle 1, which was ironic, since it was by no means safe back then, and neither is it now. Its V8 didn’t have enough juice to power the heavy body, and less than 3000 were made.
 

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
By ThePaper at the English language Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link

Ah, the Chevette. A weird mix between a Pinto and a Gremlin, it managed to combine the worst characteristics from both vehicles. Designed as a hatchback, but with a snout, it’s considered by many to be the ugliest car ever conceived. Although it brings back fond memories of high school to a lot of people, most of them remember it as that one car which was always in the repair shop.

1978_chevette.jpg
 

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
PlymouthProwlerGold-1024x768.jpg


By 293.xx.xxx.xx – Own work, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2996898

So far, we’ve covered cars built in the 80s, or even before that. The Prowler was originally released in 1997, and with a name like that, people were expecting a beast of a car, something which offered excitement, fun and demanded skill and respect. What they got however, was a retro roadster/speedster mix with a “futuristic” look and an open-wheel front end. It resembled a squashed bug, especially with the mandatory bumpers which looked ridiculously out of place. The 3.5 liter V6 produced 250 hp, alright in a car its size, but not enough to make people want it.
 

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
By IFCAR – Own work, Public Domain, Link

The Aztek is probably the single most-hated car in the world. Regular people, magazines and car reviewers all agree that the Aztek doesn’t belong in this world. It wouldn’t have been so bad had it not been designed in 2001. Pontiac tried entering the crossover market, a relatively new concept at the time, but they went about it horribly wrong. The original car wasn’t that bad, but they changed it so many times and so drastically that the end result looked like something out of an Alien movie.


2002-05_Pontiac_Aztek-1024x645.jpg
 

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Janus01-1024x690.jpg
By The Bruce Weiner Microcar Museum – requested from author, CC BY 2.5, Link

Ignore the fact that there is a funny word hidden in the name Janus. Built by Germans, the same country which gave us Porsche, Bugatti, BMW and Mercedes, the Zundapp was not their finest moment, let’s just put it that way. Based on a Dornier prototype and producing 14 hp from its 250 cc motor, it could only reach 50 mph. It was a quirky car to look at, we’ll give them that, but it was perhaps too quirky for its own good. It had a rear-facing bench seat for passengers, presumably to capture photos of all the cars going past them. People didn’t really buy into the whole idea of the Janus. We wonder why.
 

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Flickr_-_DVS1mn_-_64_Chevrolet_Corvair_Monza_1-1024x768.jpg


By Greg Gjerdingen from Willmar, USA – 64 Chevrolet Corvair Monza, CC BY 2.0, Link

Before all you American patriots start roasting us, hear us out. Rear-engined vehicles are a joy to drive most of the time, even if they’re sort of scary. A lot of manufacturers have tried to implement the concept, but it never worked, because putting the heaviest car component at the back usually results in spinning, it’s as simple as that. Nazi officers in Czechoslovakia were even banned from driving the rear-engined Tatras at the time due to the number of accidents associated with them. And yet, none of those things stopped Chevrolet from launching the Corvair in 1961. Chevy did manage to put an air-cooled flat-six engine, so we’ll give them that, but they failed to provide adequent swing-axle rear suspension to cope with the motor. This made it ridiculously prone to oversteer, and we’re talking at regular speeds here, and, perhaps even worse, it was almost always fatal in the event of a crash, since there was no engine at the front to lessen the impact. Not Chevrolet’s finest hour then.
 

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Reliant_Robin_Green-1024x768.jpg


By Oxyman – Own work, CC BY 2.5, Link

You may not consider the Reliant Robin a car since it technically had only three wheels, but for the sake of this article, we’ll list it regardless. Now, there are lots of actual cars with just 3 wheels, but most of them don’t have the Robin’s ridiculous configuration. Instead of the traditional two wheels at the front one at the back layout, Reliant decided to completely reinvent the segment by placing one wheel at the front and two at the rear. The result was a spectacular crash waiting to happen anytime you went over 25 mph around a corner. The car would immediately start to tilt, and exceeding 45 degrees of angle would cause a complete rollover. The car’s popularity in England was a result of its rarity, gaining a small cult following.
 

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
1975_Lincoln_Continental_Mark_IV_Dutch_licence_registration_21-YB-60_p1-1024x635.jpg


The fifth-gen Lincoln Continental is the car which contributed the most to American vehicles getting a bad reputation. It singlehandedly managed to ruin the American automobile reputation, that of cars which once represented quality and luxury. It wasn’t that it was just slow, cumbersome or ugly, but the fact that it had no real character or presence, it was boring in every single way. Most often even terrible cars have certain quirks which you find interesting, or offer some charm through their faults, but sadly, the Mark IV did none of those things. Lots of Americans probably still love this thing to bit, but no one can convince us that it’s a good car. It wasn’t back then, and it sure as hell isn’t today.
 

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
2000-04_Ford_Excursion-1024x680.jpg

The Excursion was supposed to be to Ford what the H2 was to Hummer and GM. Based on the Super Duty truck platform originally intended for workhorses, this mountain-sized SUV proved to be a disaster almost immediately after its launch. It weighed a massive 7,000 pounds, measured in at 19 ft. and stood 6.5 ft. tall. Lots of ranchers and farmers bought it because of its 10,000-lb towing capacity, but for every single customer who used it for its intended purpose, you could find a housewife using it for daily excursions and runabout errands. Despite its size, it wasn’t particularly safe, especially for other road users.
 

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
FSO_Polonez_1500_2-1024x768.jpg

The Polonez is a noble thing. It was designed to be used in Poland, Russian and all other Slavic countries, as means of cheap transportation. However, it was so unreliable that you were often better off walking than taking your car, as the chances of it failing were one out of every two. When you consider you have to take a round trip, you’re more likely than not going to end up walking home anyway. It looks like a brick on wheels, and it drives like one as well.
 

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
1200px-2004_Citroën_C3_Pluriel_convertible_2016-01-04_01-1024x684.jpg

So far we’ve only discussed older cars, but we’re about to roast new ones, starting with this: the Citroen Pluriel. The concept doesn’t sound too bad on paper. It’s a small roadster/convertible with room for four people (just), and with diesel engines on offer, it’s even economical. However, the roof has to be manually detached, which takes an eternity in itself, and then you can’t even bring the detachable parts with you since they don’t physically fit in the car. This means you have to either drive your car out of the garage with the roof on, or of. Basically, if it ever rains, you’re done for.
 

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Lexus_SC_430-1024x650.jpg

What’s wrong with a luxury coupe you might ask? One huge thing if we’re honest. It boasts traditional Lexus reliability and quality, but its positioning is slightly confusing, like it’s suffering from the X6 syndrome. With a relatively large $61k MSRP price and expensive maintenance cost, people expected it to be mind-blowing. Which it wasn’t. The ride was harsh, it wallowed way too much in the corners and with just 300 horsepower, it couldn’t keep up with any of its rivals since it was as heavy as a boat. Next!
 

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Eagle_Premier-1024x652.jpg


With this car, it’s not a matter of what’s wrong with it, but what’s right with it? It is just a car, much in the same way that a toaster is just a toaster and a microwave is a microwave. No one ever saw this as anything more than an appliance, and a bad one at that. It lacks any kind of soul or meaning. It’s slow, ugly and boring in every single way. You only bought one back then because you knew nothing about car and needed something to get around, and god only knows why you would buy one today (don’t do it, we urge you).
 

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
MerkurXr4ti.jpg

Okay, first off there’s the name. It was called the XR4TI. It wasn’t cool or catchy back then, and it certainly isn’t now. Just imagine having to say that to someone when they inevitably ask you what kind of a car it is. Then there’s the actual car itself. The Merkur was sold in the U.S. for 4 years straight, and believe it or not, this terrible car was based on the European-spec Ford Scorpio, a car which wasn’t that great to begin with. Its two-level wing was the only great thing about it, but after two years Ford decided to switch it to a normal, single wing, ruining the best thing about it. Shortly thereafter Ford decided to discontinue it, for reasons citing lack of sales. Needless to say, it didn’t come as a shock to anyone.
 

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Blue_Yugo_GV_in_San_Francisco.jpg

The Yugo GV wasn’t that bad in the poor countries of Communist Yugoslavia. Back when resources were limited, it offered simple means of transport for the masses. Everyone and their grandmother had one. It was used as a family sedan, a light off-roader, a workhorse, and even, if you can imagine it, a racecar. Don’t ask, you don’t want to know how it fared. The problem was that it somehow managed to find its way to the U.S., a land dominated by massive boat-like cars with cabins big enough to fit three Yugos and more comfort than the small, cramp GV could even dream of. Couple that with the fact that you had to pay extra for the carpets and that it always broke down due to electrical or mechanical reasons, and you get why no one bought it.
 

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Davis_Divan_NATMUS_May_2011-1024x768.jpg

Originally designed in California, the Davis Divan offered a three-wheel layout which had a goal of revolutionizing modern travel. It was “made” from 1947 to 1949. Because the company got plagued with various claims of fraud and grand theft after they failed to deliver the cars on time, they had to shut down to settle the lawsuits. They did manage to build 13 examples, but they were all terrible.
 

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Cadillac_Cimarron_2_-_07-01-2009-1024x573.jpg

Cadillac was a symbol of American luxury, comfort and style back in the 80s. Which really begs the question: what were the employees at Cadillac doing or smoking when they thought of the Cimarron? Well, they didn’t technically think of it, but rather took a Chevrolet Cavalier, removed all the Chevy badges, installed Cadillac ones and off it went into production. It’s a good thing they decided to stop making it when they did, or Cadillac’s reputation and image might have been further hurt.
 
Top