• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

The Wealth of Nations

neddy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
20120609_woc357.png


The wealth of nations
Jun 5th 2012, 11:56 by The Economist

An alternative approach to measuring national well-being

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT, better known by its initials, GDP, has been economists' chosen measure of a nation's well-being for over 70 years. But it has limitations; it takes no account of environmental degradation and excludes unpaid services such as volunteering and housework, for example. In the words of Bobby Kennedy, speaking in 1968, "it measures everything...except that which makes life worthwhile." In an attempt to address these shortcomings the OECD, a mainly rich-country think-tank, has created the "Better-Life" index. Now in its second year, the index uses 24 variables (which include both hard data and survey data) across 11 sectors to create a measure of welfare for 34 of its member countries, plus Brazil and Russia. The Economist has grouped these 11 sectors into four broader categories. America excels most in money and jobs, Switzerland in health and education. This year the OECD has adjusted the index for equality to give an estimate for the top and bottom 20% of each country's population. America scores particularly poorly on this account, with the bottom 20% having an index score some 25% below that of the top 20%.
 
Last edited:
Top