• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

The uneven nature of Singapore's justice system

SNAblog

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
1,489
Points
0
http://us.asiancorrespondent.com/the-asia-file/the-uneven-nature-of-singapore-s-justice-system

Asian Correspondent, 15 Jan 2010

The uneven nature of Singapore's justice system

by Ben Bland

With 21-year-old Malaysian drug mule Yong Vui Kong likely to face the gallows in Singapore this year (pending a final appeal) for importing 42 grams of heroin I was bemused to read about the following case in the Straits Times:

Madhuri Jaya Chandra Reddy, a 21-year-old Indian national, has been found guilty of strangling a prostitute who was seven months pregnant and stuffing her body beneath the bed of a hotel room in Geylang, Singapore's red light district, before bringing another prostitute back to the room and having sex with her on the same bed.

While murder, like drug trafficking, carries the mandatory death penalty, Reddy received the relatively lenient sentence of 17 years in jail and 12 strokes of the cane.

The reason: prosecutors accepted his guilty plea of "culpable homicide" (similar to manslaughter) rather than push for a murder charge that would have sent Reddy to the gallows if he was found guilty.

Reddy claimed in court that the woman had tried to attack him by approaching him with a clenched fist following a dispute about whether he had to pay for another round of sex, according to Channel News Asia.

Without out having sat in on the proceedings it is impossible to judge whether this was the case. What is clear is that the Singaporean prosecutors and judge showed Reddy a certain level of leniency by not pursuing a murder charge and by not giving him the maximum life sentence applicable for those found guilty of culpable homicide.

My point is not to cast doubt on the outcome of Reddy's trial but to demonstrate the extreme disparity between how the justice system has treated Reddy, who killed a pregnant woman in a heinous fashion, and Yong, who smuggled a small amount of drugs into Singapore.

Although Yong's appeal is likely to fail, there is still time for Singaporeans to put pressure on their government to show a naive, low-level drug mule the leniency that has been accorded to a callous killer.
 
why hang the couriers when they are not directly responsible for death?

for those who are directly responsible for deaths, even in traffic accidents, they are exempted from hanging?

what kind of monkey laws we have here in SGP? :D
 
http://us.asiancorrespondent.com/the-asia-file/the-uneven-nature-of-singapore-s-justice-system

Asian Correspondent, 15 Jan 2010

The uneven nature of Singapore's justice system

by Ben Bland

With 21-year-old Malaysian drug mule Yong Vui Kong likely to face the gallows in Singapore this year (pending a final appeal) for importing 42 grams of heroin I was bemused to read about the following case in the Straits Times:

Madhuri Jaya Chandra Reddy, a 21-year-old Indian national, has been found guilty of strangling a prostitute who was seven months pregnant and stuffing her body beneath the bed of a hotel room in Geylang, Singapore's red light district, before bringing another prostitute back to the room and having sex with her on the same bed.

While murder, like drug trafficking, carries the mandatory death penalty, Reddy received the relatively lenient sentence of 17 years in jail and 12 strokes of the cane.

The reason: prosecutors accepted his guilty plea of "culpable homicide" (similar to manslaughter) rather than push for a murder charge that would have sent Reddy to the gallows if he was found guilty.

Reddy claimed in court that the woman had tried to attack him by approaching him with a clenched fist following a dispute about whether he had to pay for another round of sex, according to Channel News Asia.

Without out having sat in on the proceedings it is impossible to judge whether this was the case. What is clear is that the Singaporean prosecutors and judge showed Reddy a certain level of leniency by not pursuing a murder charge and by not giving him the maximum life sentence applicable for those found guilty of culpable homicide.

My point is not to cast doubt on the outcome of Reddy's trial but to demonstrate the extreme disparity between how the justice system has treated Reddy, who killed a pregnant woman in a heinous fashion, and Yong, who smuggled a small amount of drugs into Singapore.

Although Yong's appeal is likely to fail, there is still time for Singaporeans to put pressure on their government to show a naive, low-level drug mule the leniency that has been accorded to a callous killer.

It is a known fact that the Singapore govt will not hang anyone from the Philipines, Indonesia, Australia, USA and Europe.

I guess the latest addition is India.
 
I too thought that this case involving the Sri Lankan looked very odd. After the murder, he had no qualms about bringing another prosititute and screwing her while he had earlier stuffed the mudered lady under the bed. So much for remorse. AG must have also assumed that the Lady's hand is a lethal weapon.

I noticed this trend involving FTs not because they are to be accorded special treatment but these are assumed to be "insignificant" as involving 2 lower scale of FTs, a labourer (the accused) a foreign prosititute (the victim) and thus assigned to be investigated by a junior officer. These junior officer in court are basically clowns that cannot string a proper sentence and thus they must have convinced the accuesed to plea bargain.

I knew Justice will be skewed when they got Sgts (Div 3 grade in Civil Service) to handle such cases when it involved FT labourers, In the past, the IO must be an Inspector. By the way, a sgt in Singapore is not related to a Sgt in the 1st world let alone a Sgt in Malaysia. Our rank inflation is the highest in the world.
 
Something most would notice that, it seems that most of the appeals against the sentence will have it up, many times. Why then appeal, if that is the case, might as well take what is meted out, serve it out.

It looks like the appeal system is a mockery, invented to add burden to any person, who commits a crime. Rarely, we read a sentence is reduced, though they are.
 
Back
Top