• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

The day I wronged a foreign worker

metalslug

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne+News/Asian+Opinions/Story/A1Story20090710-153959.html

Fri, Jul 10, 2009
my paper

20090710.115048_foreign_worker_rotator.jpg


The day I wronged a foreign worker

By Joy Fang

IT WAS a simple, unspoken act that lasted only a few seconds, but which has left me guilt-ridden till today.

I had an encounter with a foreign worker last week that got me thinking about the sometimes tenuous relationship Singaporeans have with foreign workers.


Last year, there was a furore among Serangoon Garden residents after the Government proposed building a foreign workers' dormitory in the area.

Some 1,000 agitated residents petitioned against it - in vain - citing reasons such as security issues and a potential dip in the value of their property.

As someone who lives nearby, I was also apprehensive, but felt it was insensitive of some residents to reject the workers.

I had always thought I was sensible and open-minded - that is, until one morning last week, when I did something on reflex which exposed my own prejudices.

I was walking towards the usual spot where I park my car for my drive to work. To my surprise, I saw a construction worker in his 20s sitting cross-legged on the pavement beside it.

Dressed in work overalls, the young man was reading the newspapers.

I froze. Then, without thinking, I quickly got into my car and locked all the doors - all the while keeping a close eye on him to see if he would make a move.

Not once did he look up. As I drove away, my brief sense of relief gave way to guilt and dismay.

Why did I do something so utterly baseless? The poor man certainly didn't deserve such treatment.

During my undergraduate days, while studying for a social-psychology course, I came across a research experiment done in the United States.

The findings were a revelation: They showed that even though one believes that he does not have any prejudices, he still has certain ideas "programmed" in him because of socialisation.

Also, how many of you have raised a hue and cry over some form of hostility you experienced from locals when overseas?

I know I have, and so have my friends.

For example, a friend studying in Sydney recounted how someone drove by in a car and yelled "go back where you came from" at her, while she was walking in the street.

So, was my behaviour any less forgivable than this overt display of xenophobia? No. It is time to reflect on our own actions and to take responsibility for them.

We all have biases based on a fear of the unknown.


And so we respond in a knee-jerk way (yes, guilty as charged), which often seems rather silly in retrospect.

Next time, before we allow our prejudices to prevail over our good sense, we should ponder about whether our actions might hurt another human being.

In the case of foreign workers, instead of avoiding them or pretending that they don't exist, a little smile or a casual hello might go a long way towards making them feel accepted.

So, to the man who I unintentionally wronged, I'm sorry. I'll be sure to smile the next time I see you.


For more my paper stories click here.
 

Ah Guan

Alfrescian
Loyal
Pui! Another 'Should Love Our FT' spin...

Racism exists in every society

The only people who are truely non racist are the blind
 

yellow_people

Alfrescian
Loyal
Pui! Another 'Should Love Our FT' spin...

Racism exists in every society

The only people who are truely non racist are the blind

This is a FW not FT. The distinction is important. You seem to have mixed up the two.

The FW does the job SG Chinks would never dream of doing and cleans up after them for slave labour wages.

The FT is the one that takes away SG Chinks job and fuck their women.

Thanks for confirming once again that SG is a racist country. It is the 1st world nation that not only recognizes racism exists but sets out to protect its people through legislation and education.

Third world countries simply say racism exist everywhere and do nothing about it. Therefore it is only natural for third world countries like Singapore to attract 3rd rate FTs. Top talents opt for civilized nations bypassing SG. Even then the SG Chink has a hard time competing with third rate talents.
 

Angelo

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is a FW not FT. The distinction is important. You seem to have mixed up the two.

The FW does the job SG Chinks would never dream of doing and cleans up after them for slave labour wages.

The FT is the one that takes away SG Chinks job and fuck their women.

Thanks for confirming once again that SG is a racist country. It is the 1st world nation that not only recognizes racism exists but sets out to protect its people through legislation and education.

Third world countries simply say racism exist everywhere and do nothing about it. Therefore it is only natural for third world countries like Singapore to attract 3rd rate FTs. Top talents opt for civilized nations bypassing SG. Even then the SG Chink has a hard time competing with third rate talents.

black shit is here again. :biggrin:

kekleng, you are a piece of walking shit. same color same smell.

ur dark continent is one huge garbage dump anyway, so

why don't u go back where u belong?

hmmmm....
 

yellow_people

Alfrescian
Loyal
Hello Angelo long time no see.

Don't worry about India being a garbage dump. Its afterall a functioning democracy where news good or bad comes out in the open. What you see is what you get.

Contrast with this report about proverty in China.

http://uk.oneworld.net/guides/china/poverty?gclid=COLb_tbKy5sCFUUwpAodTkrBJA

"China offers an illuminating example of how inconsistent methods of calculating poverty have hampered assessment of progress towards the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). According to the 2005 China Human Development Report produced by a government agency, there were only 26 million Chinese living in extreme poverty at the end of 2004. By contrast a working paper published by the World Bank in 2008 suggests a figure of 287 million at the corresponding date. The discrepancy stems from China's own definition of extreme poverty which is barely one quarter of the international guideline figure of just over $1 per day purchasing power and which is one of the lowest of all national poverty thresholds adopted by developing countries. "
 

Angelo

Alfrescian
Loyal
Poverty in India
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Percent of population living under the poverty line, which is 356.35 rupees or around $7 a month in rural areas.

The World Bank estimates that 456 million Indians (42% of the total Indian population) now live under the global poverty line of $1.25 per day (PPP). This means that a third of the global poor now reside in India. However, this also represents a significant decline in poverty from 60 percent in 1981 to 42 percent in 2005, although the rupee has decreased in value since then, while the official standard of 538/356 rupees per month has remained the same.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Income inequality in India (Gini coefficient: 32.5 in year 1999- 2000)[8] is increasing. On the other hand, the Planning Commission of India uses its own criteria and has estimated that 27.5% of the population was living below the poverty line in 2004–2005, down from 51.3% in 1977–1978, and 36% in 1993-1994[9]. The source for this was the 61st round of the National Sample Survey (NSS) and the criterion used was monthly per capita consumption expenditure below Rs. 356.35 for rural areas and Rs. 538.60 for urban areas. 75% of the poor are in rural areas, most of them are daily wagers, self-employed householders and landless labourers.

Although Indian economy has grown steadily over the last two decades, its growth has been uneven when comparing different social groups, economic groups, geographic regions, and rural and urban areas.[10] Between 1999 and 2008, the annualized growth rates for Gujarat (8.8%), Haryana (8.7%), or Delhi (7.4%) were much higher than for Bihar (5.1%), Uttar Pradesh (4.4%), or Madhya Pradesh (3.5%).[11] Poverty rates in rural Orissa (43%) and rural Bihar (41%) are among the world's most extreme.[12]
The India State Hunger Index 2008 by the International Food Policy Research Institute. Punjab has the best nutritional situation, whereas malnutrition in Madhya Pradesh is worse than in Ethiopia or Sudan.

India has a higher rate of malnutrition among children under the age of three (46% in year 2007) than any other country in the world.[10][13]

Despite significant economic progress, 1/4 of the nation's population earns less than the government-specified poverty threshold of 12 rupees per day :smile: Official figures estimate that 27.5%[14] of Indians lived below the national poverty line in 2004-2005.[15] A 2007 report by the state-run National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector (NCEUS) found that 77% of Indians, or 836 million people, lived on less than 20 rupees (approximately USD $0.41) per day[16] with most working in "informal labour sector with no job or social security, living in abject proverty"

Causes of poverty in India

Caste system
Further information: Caste system in India

A proportionally large share of poor are lower castes.[18] According to S. M. Michael, Dalits constitute the bulk of poor and unemployed.[19]

Many see the caste system as a system of exploitation of poor low-ranking groups by more prosperous high-ranking groups. In many parts of India, land is largely held by high-ranking property owners of the dominant castes that economically exploit low-ranking landless labourers and poor artisans, all the while degrading them with ritual emphases on their so-called god-given inferior status. According to William A. Haviland, casteism is widespread in rural areas, and continues to segregate Dalits[20].
:biggrin:
 

myo539

Alfrescian
Loyal
Nothing better to write - literally scrapping the bottom to fill up the page.

I thought she spitted on the man or shouted at him to go away, or something more obvious like sitting farther away or getting up from the MRT seat when a Bangla or PRC mei mei sit next to her.

I wonder why the Bangla don't go after our Malay/Muslim girls but often go after the Indons and Pinays, and vice versa why our Malay/Muslim girls don't go after the Banglas look much better than the local men (whatever race)?

Is all due other reasons such as economic conditions, status, looks, attitude, prejudices etc rather than race?
 

yellow_people

Alfrescian
Loyal
Just further explains why a paanwalla like you is in sinkapore with your fake CV

Maybe so but can still kick the SG Chink arse who are only good at whining and whinging about Indian FT. Kia Cheng Hu and Bo Lumpar - that's the SG Chink for you.
 
Top