Tharman says FUCK U sinkies! Dont ask so many questions! We only respond to FTrash!

[jim007jimmyboy]

Aug 18, 2009
S'pore Parliament
No goodwill for Goodyear

FORMER chief executive-to-be Mr Charles Goodyear received no goodwill payment for his four months' work at Temasek Holdings the Finance Minister revealed in Parliament.

But after 25 minutes of grilling, the House emerged none the wiser over what exactly the strategic differences were that led to his sudden departure.

Members of Parliament threw question after question at Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam asking him to get Temasek to share with the public what went on behind the scences but he would not budge.

He said that disclosing the information would serve no strategic purpose and that was not unlike the actios of other publicly-listed companies in the private sector.

'People do want to know, there is curiosity, it is a matter of public interest. That is not sufficent reason to disclose information. It is not sufficent that there be curiosty and interest that you want to disclose information,' he said in response to questioning frfom Mr Low Thia Kiang, opposition MP for Hougang.

He reiterated that the words in Temasek's statement to the public were carefully chosen and the Government would not add to that.

In July, Temasek had announced that Mr Goodyear would be leaving the organisation due to unresolved strategic differences.

Mr Tharman also said that hiccup in succession planning was a dent to Temasek's reputation. 'It is a very visible dent in the fender, no damage to bodyparts, no damage to the axle, no damage to the engine.'

 

[jim007jimmyboy]

Re: Tharman says FUCK U sinkies! Dont ask so many questions! We only respond to FTras

fucking cheebye bin taking millions to shut his lanjiao mouth.

Go suck cock!

 

[po2wq]

Re: Tharman says FUCK U sinkies! Dont ask so many questions! We only respond to FTras

... Mr Tharman also said that hiccup in succession planning was a dent to Temasek's reputation. 'It is a very visible dent in the fender, no damage to bodyparts, no damage to the axle, no damage to the engine.' ...

never mind la ...

evrybody else oso can c iz oredi huge hole in iz reputation ... wen it bot boa n barclays shares @ hi n sell dem low ... iz oredi a laffing stock! ...

 

[Blue6]

Re: Tharman says FUCK U sinkies! Dont ask so many questions! We only respond to FTras

Mr Tharman also said that hiccup in succession planning was a dent to Temasek's reputation. 'It is a very visible dent in the fender, no damage to bodyparts, no damage to the axle, no damage to the engine.'

That's so true. A Made in Singapore, Ho Ching model of the Lee marque.

 

[halsey02]

Re: Tharman says FUCK U sinkies! Dont ask so many questions! We only respond to FTras

That's so true. A Made in Singapore, Ho Ching model of the Lee marque.

>Mr Tharman also said that hiccup in succession planning was a dent to Temasek's reputation. 'It is a very visible dent in the fender, no damage to bodyparts, no damage to the axle, no damage to the engine.' >

Is the bald ah neh, talking about the paper machie ones they are make for the Toaist funerals or the seven month?

The HJ mark 1, where the axle had already being broken & soldered back, the engine was filled with sand, drained & reconditioned....this is a very old benz....made after 1959.

Of course lah!....it is only a slight dent!, the fender was made in Germany...and the would not be using GOOD YEAR tyres for ages to come!!

 

[ahleebabasingaporethief]

Re: Tharman says FUCK U sinkies! Dont ask so many questions! We only respond to FTras

Did a google on his name and found this.

<table class="tborder" style="border-bottom-width: 0px;" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="1" width="100%"><tbody><tr><td class="tcat" width="100%">
</td> <td style="cursor: pointer;" class="vbmenu_control" id="threadtools" nowrap="nowrap"> Thread Tools <script type="text/javascript"> vbmenu_register("threadtools"); </script>

</td> <td style="cursor: pointer;" class="vbmenu_control" id="threadsearch" nowrap="nowrap"> Search this Thread <script type="text/javascript"> vbmenu_register("threadsearch"); </script>

</td> <td style="cursor: pointer;" class="vbmenu_control" id="displaymodes" nowrap="nowrap"> Display Modes <script type="text/javascript"> vbmenu_register("displaymodes"); </script>

</td> </tr> </tbody></table> <!-- / toolbar --> <!-- end content table --> <!-- / close content container --> <!-- / end content table --> <!-- post #1493113 --> <!-- open content container --> <!-- this is not the last post shown on the page --> <table class="tborder" id="post1493113" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="1" width="100%"><tbody><tr> <td class="thead"> #1
<!-- status icon and date -->

28-07-2008, 06:57 PM <!-- / status icon and date -->
</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="alt2" style="padding: 0px;"> <!-- user info --> <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="6" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td nowrap="nowrap"> taurius58

<script type="text/javascript"> vbmenu_register("postmenu_1493113", true); </script>
STOMPer
</td> <td width="100%"> </td> <td valign="top" nowrap="nowrap"> Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 164


</td> </tr> </tbody></table> <!-- / user info --> </td> </tr> <tr> <td class="alt1" id="td_post_1493113"> <!-- message, attachments, sig --> <!-- icon and title -->

Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam
<hr style="color: rgb(209, 209, 225);" size="1"> <!-- / icon and title --> <!-- message --> In the Straits Times 28 July 2008, Home Page H4, an article was featured about our Attorney General Walter Woon going to the Court of Appeal to urge the court to amend an earlier High Court decision of a 9-year jail term to a life term instead on a convicted criminal for manipulating a teen in a murder case.

A former AG Chan Sek Keong was also featured, where it was mentioned that he prosecuted 5 men for breach of the Official Secrets Act in 1993.

In 1994, all five men including the present Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam were subsequently convicted and each fined between $1,500 and $6,000 each.

My question is: how is it that a convicted person like Tharman is allowed to become a full minister, and a Finance Minister as such?

Could someone who is legally trained shed some light on this issue, and enlighten us?
<!-- / message -->

<!-- controls --> ​

</td></tr></tbody></table>

 

[makapaaa]

Re: Tharman says FUCK U sinkies! Dont ask so many questions! We only respond to FTras

Indeed the Old Fart would use leegal excuses to bar the Oppos from running in the elections. For hiw own blue eye dogs, anything goes. So much for his lan cheow "rule of law"!

 

[angie]

Re: Tharman says FUCK U sinkies! Dont ask so many questions! We only respond to FTras

"Dey... i kena charged before for having a loose tongue so now i kiasi liao, its a honest mistake let's move on"
​

Career

Much of Tharman's earlier, professional career was spent at the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), Singapore’s central bank and financial regulator, where he was the Managing Director. Till today, he still serves on the Board of MAS, and sits on the Board of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation. He is also Deputy Chairman of the National Research Foundation.

Tharman is also Co-Chairman of the Singapore-Liaoning Economic and Trade Council (SLETC), which was established in 2003 to advance stronger links between Singapore and Liaoning Province, China. He is Chairman of the Ong Teng Cheong Institute of Labour Studies, and serves as a Life Trustee of the Singapore Indian Development Association. In 1999, he was awarded the Singapore Public Administration Gold Medal.

Arrest and Conviction

While serving as economics director in Monetary Authority of Singapore in 1993, Tharman was charged under the Official Secrets Act for inadvertently releasing Singapore's 1992 second-quarter flash projections<sup id="cite_ref-TharmanConvict_2-0" class="reference">[3]</sup> to a research director Mr Raymond Foo, and economist Manu Bhaskaran, of Crosby Securities and journalists, Kenneth James and Patrick Daniel from the Business Times.

Tharmam was convicted by Senior District Judge Richard Magnus, and fined S$1,500 along with the other defendants.

Political career

Upon entering politics in 2001, Tharman was appointed a Senior Minister of State in the Ministry of Trade and Industry and the Ministry of Education. In August 2003, he was appointed Acting Minister for Education. The following year, he became the Minister for Education. In May 2006, he was also appointed the post of Second Minister for Finance.<sup id="cite_ref-TharmanCab_3-0" class="reference">[4]</sup>
In December 2007, Tharman was appoinited Minister for Finance. (He continued to concurrently hold the post of Minister for Education until 2008.)<sup id="cite_ref-TharmanFM_0-1" class="reference">[1] </sup> Tharman is also the Deputy Chairman of the Monetary Authority of Singapore. In 2002, Tharman was appointed to the Central Executive Committee of the PAP, and is currently its Assistant Treasurer.
Tharman is a Member of Parliament for Jurong GRC.

Private life

Tharman is married to Jane Yumiko Ittogi, a lawyer of Chinese-Japanese parentage.<sup id="cite_ref-4" class="reference">[5]</sup> They have four children, three sons and one daughter. All of his children are of school-going age.


.

 

[CPTMiller]

Re: Tharman says FUCK U sinkies! Dont ask so many questions! We only respond to FTras

Obviously you have no idea how the PM choose the minister.
He has to follow a set of procedure.
But the most important he must be happy about it.
So far Tharman has done a good job between him and Madam Ho Ching.

Did a google on his name and found this.

<table class="tborder" style="border-bottom-width: 0px;" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="1" width="100%"><tbody><tr><td class="tcat" width="100%">
</td> <td style="cursor: pointer;" class="vbmenu_control" id="threadtools" nowrap="nowrap"> Thread Tools <script type="text/javascript"> vbmenu_register("threadtools"); </script>

</td> <td style="cursor: pointer;" class="vbmenu_control" id="threadsearch" nowrap="nowrap"> Search this Thread <script type="text/javascript"> vbmenu_register("threadsearch"); </script>

</td> <td style="cursor: pointer;" class="vbmenu_control" id="displaymodes" nowrap="nowrap"> Display Modes <script type="text/javascript"> vbmenu_register("displaymodes"); </script>

</td> </tr> </tbody></table> <!-- / toolbar --> <!-- end content table --> <!-- / close content container --> <!-- / end content table --> <!-- post #1493113 --> <!-- open content container --> <!-- this is not the last post shown on the page --> <table class="tborder" id="post1493113" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="1" width="100%"><tbody><tr> <td class="thead"> #1
<!-- status icon and date -->

28-07-2008, 06:57 PM <!-- / status icon and date -->
</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="alt2" style="padding: 0px;"> <!-- user info --> <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="6" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td nowrap="nowrap"> taurius58

<script type="text/javascript"> vbmenu_register("postmenu_1493113", true); </script>
STOMPer
</td> <td width="100%"> </td> <td valign="top" nowrap="nowrap"> Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 164


</td> </tr> </tbody></table> <!-- / user info --> </td> </tr> <tr> <td class="alt1" id="td_post_1493113"> <!-- message, attachments, sig --> <!-- icon and title -->

Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam
<hr style="color: rgb(209, 209, 225);" size="1"> <!-- / icon and title --> <!-- message --> In the Straits Times 28 July 2008, Home Page H4, an article was featured about our Attorney General Walter Woon going to the Court of Appeal to urge the court to amend an earlier High Court decision of a 9-year jail term to a life term instead on a convicted criminal for manipulating a teen in a murder case.

A former AG Chan Sek Keong was also featured, where it was mentioned that he prosecuted 5 men for breach of the Official Secrets Act in 1993.

In 1994, all five men including the present Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam were subsequently convicted and each fined between $1,500 and $6,000 each.

My question is: how is it that a convicted person like Tharman is allowed to become a full minister, and a Finance Minister as such?

Could someone who is legally trained shed some light on this issue, and enlighten us?
<!-- / message -->

<!-- controls --> ​

</td></tr></tbody></table>

 

[jim007jimmyboy]

Re: Tharman says FUCK U sinkies! Dont ask so many questions! We only respond to FTras

Indeed the Old Fart would use leegal excuses to bar the Oppos from running in the elections. For hiw own blue eye dogs, anything goes. So much for his lan cheow "rule of law"!

remember old fart once scolded us over million dollars salary "we need men of integrity and honesty!"

fucking hell position of Finance Ministar can let a guy with tarnish record & with criminal record hold the position????

 

[littlefish]

Re: Tharman says FUCK U sinkies! Dont ask so many questions! We only respond to FTras

I no longer see any point in going after people like him. If you get rid of this guy, they will replace him with another one who will act similarly. Getting rid of people like him will not solve the problem. The root cause of the problem is plain to see. Until the day Singaporeans understand how democracy works and fight passionately for it, it is better to be part of the system than to fight against it. The PAP is right, too many people are of the peasant stock. That is why they need to import the FTs to improve the stock before they can modify the system.

The fault lies with Singaporeans for allowing such a system to perpetuate for so many years.

 

[Watchman]

Re: Tharman says FUCK U sinkies! Dont ask so many questions! We only respond to FTras

 

[coolguy]

Re: Tharman says FUCK U sinkies! Dont ask so many questions! We only respond to FTras

Your think i am stupid moron or what?
Your never heard your mother or grandmother say before, those got no hair in the center of the head very smart one meh? Somemore my center botak until so shining, this will tell you how good my shoe polishing skill is.:oIo:
Just because a small harmless fly LTK question, I must spill everything out?
Nay. I don't say, what can your do to me? Whahahahaha.