• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Temasek & GIC Twa Kee Liao!

Merl Haggard

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
SPECIAL REPORT: America's Money Crisis

Bank of America: $20B bailout, huge Merrill loss


U.S. injects capital in nation's largest bank yet again, shields it from up to $118B in losses. CEO Lewis: Treasury thought 'walking away' from Merrill would hurt markets.

January 16, 2009: 2:32 PM ET



NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Bank of America has received another $20 billion from the federal government's bailout fund, along with guarantees on $118 billion of assets at the bank, to absorb its recent purchase of the ailing Merrill Lynch.

Details of the deal were announced by the government in the early hours of Friday.

The new arrangement provides additional capital for Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) in exchange for preferred stock with an 8% dividend, according to a joint statement by the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve.

The Treasury will extend $20 billion more to the bank under the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. The funding will come from the TARP Targeted Investment Program, not the subset $250 billion Capital Investment Program designed to prop up healthy banks' balance sheets.

The bailout deal also provides a $118 billion backstop from the Fed in case of "unusually large losses" on assets backed by real-estate loans, most of which are being absorbed by Bank of America in its buyout of brokerage house Merrill Lynch. Bank of America will pay 3.7% of those assets as a fee for the backstop, and is responsible for the first $10 billion of losses and 10% of the remaining losses.

According to Ken Lewis, Bank of America's chief executive, Bank of America realized soon after its merger deal with Merrill Lynch in mid-September that Merrill's losses were accelerating beyond expectations. In December, the bank discovered Merrill's asset deterioration was "much, much higher" than anyone had forecast.

But when the bank considered renegotiating the deal, the Treasury Department intervened.

"As we saw the anticipated loss accelerating, we reevaluated our rights under the deal," Lewis said on a conference call with investors. "The government was under the view that walking away would cause significant concerns and serious systemic harm to the financial markets."

Lewis said the government's response led to considerable uncertainty about its next steps, but in the end, he concluded that sticking with the deal would best benefit the national economy.

"We did think we were doing the right thing for the country," Lewis said.

Huge quarterly losses

The news came just before the nation's largest bank reported a net loss of $1.79 billion in the fourth quarter of 2008, compared to earnings of $268 million at the same period in 2007.

The net loss to common shareholders, including the issuance of preferred stock dividends that the government receives from its preliminary capital investment, was $2.39 billion, or 48 cents per share. Analysts expected earnings of 8 cents per share.

The loss did not include Merrill Lynch's results. The recently acquired investment bank reported a loss of $15.31 billion, or $9.62 per share. Bank of America cited "severe capital markets dislocations" for Merrill's huge loss, especially late in the quarter.

"The acquisition of [Merrill Lynch] significantly increases [Bank of America's] exposure to currently depressed capital markets-related revenues," wrote Jeff Harte, analyst with Sandler O'Neill & Partners, in a note.

Citing escalating credit costs, significant writedowns, trading losses and a deep economic recession, Bank of America slashed its dividend from 32 cents a share to just a penny. The bank had already cut its dividend in half in the previous quarter.

"These are extraordinary times," said Lewis. "The credit markets literally hit a wall, and nobody lending to consumers or who is in the capital markets is immune."

Third bailout's a charm

Bank of America has now received a total of $45 billion in government aid. Before the latest injection, it had been the recipient of $15 billion in government capital in October, and $10 billion last Friday - an investment that had been set aside for Merrill Lynch.

The deal marks the second time the federal government has had to step in again to prop up a faltering financial institution. In November, officials injected another $20 billion into Citigroup (C, Fortune 500), which had already received $25 billion, and agreed to backstop more than $300 billion in troubled assets.

Aimed at fostering stability in the financial system, the $20 billion lifeline should be transferred to Bank of America later Friday, according to a senior government official.

Banks receiving TARP funds have been criticized for hoarding the cash to raise capital ratios, rather than lending it to improve the credit situation.

"Legislators raised concerns that we're pulling back on credit," Lewis said. "It is true, our appetite on credit risk is greatly reduced. How could it be otherwise?"

Still, Lewis noted that the bank originated $115 billion in new credit in the fourth quarter, including many new home loans. The bank said demand for mortgages surged in late December as loan rates fell.

Bank of America's shares fell 14% in afternoon trading after dropping 18.4% Thursday. They have fallen 45% so far this week on concerns that the bank -- which had been viewed as one of the strongest in the country -- may be buckling as the nation's economy worsens.

The Charlotte, N.C.-based bank has also taken over two ailing companies that thrust it deeper into the most troubled sectors of the financial system. Not only did it take a big gamble on its $24 billion acquisition of the faltering brokerage titan, but it also bought battered mortgage lender Countrywide Financial early last year.

Bank of America already has announced it plans to shed up to 35,000 jobs over the next three years as it integrates the Wall Street firm. Chief Executive Ken Lewis gave up his 2008 bonus last week.
More to come?

Officials didn't disclose whether other troubled banks would need similar assistance. "Each time we do one of these, we hope it's the last one we will ever have to do," one official said.

Bank earnings this quarter have been dismal so far. Citigroup reported a whopping loss Friday, while JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) said its profits plummeted 76% Thursday.

The Treasury Department has less than $60 billion left to inject into banks under its capital purchase program. President-elect Barack Obama on Thursday secured access to the $350 billion remaining in the federal bailout package, after a measure that would have blocked the funds' release failed in the Senate.

Some analysts say banks are likely to get additional capital infusions this year. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said Tuesday that the government must pump more money into troubled financial institutions and that further guarantees of their debt could be necessary.

-- CNN's Scott Spoerry contributed to this report.
 

Merl Haggard

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Citi splitting into two after $8.3 billion loss

Results come in far worse than analysts were anticipating; banking giant will realign into two units, ending its so-called 'universal banking' business model.


By David Ellis, CNNMoney.com staff writer
Last Updated: January 16, 2009

Under the new arrangement, Citigroup would split itself into two units: Citicorp and Citi Holdings. The more stable Citicorp would house, among other things, the company's private and investment bank as well as its credit card and consumer banking business, with about $1.1 trillion in assets.

The smaller Citi Holdings would incorporate its so-called non-core businesses, including its Smith Barney brokerage and a pool of troubled assets that have plagued the firm for more than a year.

The Citi Holdings division would also include the $301 billion in assets that the government agreed to backstop against future losses as part of a massive rescue package plan unveiled for Citigroup in November. In addition to this guarantee, the government has also injected $45 billion into the company in exchange for preferred shares.

CEO Vikram Pandit said the difficult economic and market environment for both Citigroup and the broader banking sector forced the company's hand, adding that the move will help simplify the organization and help better serve both clients and customers.

"The realignment will preserve what makes Citi unique -- its global, universal banking footprint," he said in a statement. "We will continue to move aggressively to get Citi back on the right track and return it to a position of sustainable financial success."

Citigroup (C, Fortune 500) stock, which lost 43% of its value over the past week before the restructuring news amid concerns about its future, fell another 9% Friday.

By splitting up the firm, Citigroup would effectively take on a so-called "good bank-bad bank" structure.

Citicorp would serve as the "good bank," housing Citigroup's most reliable businesses. Citi Holdings, on the other hand, would become the "bad bank", overseeing not only the firm's troubled securities, but its consumer financial loan portfolios as well, including student loans and mortgages.

At a time when Citigroup has faced so many questions about its underlying health, some analysts said Friday's restructuring was not only done to provide greater transparency to investors, but get the firm ready to sell some of its businesses.

"Isolating badly-performing units and moving towards a more streamlined and manageable structure gives Citi a new shot at the game," said Isabel Schauerte, an analyst with Celent, a Boston-based financial research and consulting firm.

Pandit said during a conference call with investors Friday that the bank would work to implement the restructuring changes as quickly as possible, but that it was not in a rush to sell some of the Citi Holdings units. Analysts have speculated in recent months that the company may look to sell additional divisions in an effort to raise cash.

Certainly Citigroup's dramatic facelift would effectively reverse the 1998 merger between Citicorp and Travelers Group overseen by then-CEO Sanford Weill.

That deal created the modern-day Citigroup and its so-called "universal bank" approach, which aimed to offer clients and customers a smorgasbord of financial services.

For years, the model was roundly criticized by both shareholders because they believed it did not work. Pandit had reaffirmed his commitment to the business model in recent months, but that appeared to change after the government stepped in to rescue the financial services giant in November.

Still, some analysts were skeptical whether Citigroup was out of the woods following its latest move.

"There are a lot of things they still have to worry about," noted Jason Tyler, a senior vice-president at the Chicago-based Ariel Investments, citing signs of deterioration in the company's credit card portfolio in the latest quarter.
Another tough quarter for Citi

Those troubles helped contribute to Citigroup's latest loss.

The New York City-based bank said it lost $8.29 billion, or $1.72 a share, during the fourth quarter, representing the company's fifth-straight quarterly loss. The bank lost a total of $18.72 billion in 2008.

Hoping to silence market speculation about its underlying health, Citigroup moved up Friday's report. Still, the numbers were far worse than Wall Street was anticipating. Analysts were expecting the New York City-based bank to record a loss of $4.49 billion, or $1.31 a share.

"Our results continued to be depressed by an unprecedented dislocation in capital markets and a weak economy," said Pandit.

Citigroup was once again hammered by substantial writedowns on its portfolio of mortgage-related securities. The firm also recorded losses on some private equity investments, and its investment banking business took a hit as capital markets activity remained at a standstill during the final three months of 2008.

The bank also increased its loan loss reserves by $6 billion during the quarter, a sign that the company is bracing for future loan losses.

Helping to offset those losses was a one-time gain of $3.9 billion from the sale of the company's German retail banking business during the quarter.

The results cap another tumultuous week for Citi and the broader banking sector. Citi's breakup announcement was widely expected after the bank announced on Tuesday that it was selling a majority stake in Smith Barney to Morgan Stanley (MS, Fortune 500) for $2.7 billion.

Last week, long-time board member Robert Rubin stepped down following scrutiny about his failure to stop the company from ramping up its risk exposure.

Late Thursday, the federal government moved to inject another $20 billion into rival Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500), in addition to guaranteeing $118 billion in assets, to help the company complete its purchase of Merrill Lynch.
 
Top