• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Tan Jee Say: How much has GIC lost in bad investments?

sense

Alfrescian
Loyal
APR 29, 2011
SDP: How much has GIC lost in bad investments?
By Aaron Low

THE Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) candidate for Holland Bukit Timah GRC, Mr Tan Jee Say, raised the issue of transparency of government funds, saying that people still do not know how much the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC) has lost in bad investments.

Speaking to a crowd that filled almost three-quarters of a football field at Jurong East stadium, he attacked the Government for not releasing the full figures of its official reserves.

He had been taken to task by Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean and Community Development, Youth and Sports Minister Vivian Balakrishnan on Thursday for saying that his own $60 billion economic plan for Singapore was 'small change'.

According to his calculations, Mr Tan said that the Government had accumulated hundreds of billions of dollars in surpluses over the last decade and $60 billion was just a small percentage of that.

He also attacked Dr Balakrishnan over the Youth Olympic Games budget, which ballooned by $300 million.

'Manage your own ministry's budget before you criticise other people's figures!' he said.

Mr Tan's running mate Vincent Wijeysingha, 41, also took aim at DPM Teo, who had said that the government reserves were a source of comfort for Singaporeans.

'Teddy bears are for comfort. We need affordable housing, support for our elderly and our young!' said Dr Wijeysingha.

Education was also another hot topic for SDP on Friday night, as speakers hit out at the education system.

Its candidate for Yuhua, Ms Teo Soh Lung, 61, said that the education system has not progressed since she was a child, noting that the class size of about 40 has not changed.

She noted that many parents continued to rely on tuition because they were worried that without tuition, their children would not pass exams.

What does this say about our education system, she asked, challenging her Yuhua PAP opponent Grace Fu for an answer.
 
L

lauhunku

Guest
APR 29, 2011

9802142b33db475be1e1639e8d4ce49aaab8ddc.gif
 

sense

Alfrescian
Loyal
APR 29, 2011
SDP: How much has GIC lost in bad investments?

:
:
According to his calculations, Mr Tan said that the Government had accumulated hundreds of billions of dollars in surpluses over the last decade and $60 billion was just a small percentage of that.
:
:

Say Jee, take the [risky] guesswork out of your pitch.

Please help pass SJ this piece of information: "Singapore's official foreign reserves increased for the fourth consecutive month in March, data from the Monetary Authority of Singapore revealed Thursday... In Singapore dollars, total reserves grew to S$294.18 billion from S$293.29 billion in the previous month...", source: http://www.rttnews.com/Content/AsianEconomicNews.aspx?Id=1593123&SM=1

To be on the safe side, do ask SJ to verify this piece of information first before using it. In view that the report claimed to have obtained the data from MAS, double-confirm that data can also be found from at least one SG .gov website / official press.

12505439334TsS4Y.jpg
 

sense

Alfrescian
Loyal
[video=youtube;fG31dZYMbsU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fG31dZYMbsU[/video]
 
Last edited:

allanlee

Alfrescian
Loyal
Say Jee, take the [risky] guesswork out of your pitch.

Please help pass SJ this piece of information: "Singapore's official foreign reserves increased for the fourth consecutive month in March, data from the Monetary Authority of Singapore revealed Thursday... In Singapore dollars, total reserves grew to S$294.18 billion from S$293.29 billion in the previous month...[/I]", source: http://www.rttnews.com/Content/AsianEconomicNews.aspx?Id=1593123&SM=1


Some of my banker friends feel this figure is conservative....... they estimated the real figure should be around THREE (3) times what was reported.
 

sense

Alfrescian
Loyal
May 5, 2011
'Utterly wrong'? Tan Jee Say makes economic sense
I DO not agree with former MP and current Singapore Management University professor of economics Augustine Tan's arguments in his letter ('First-rate, not First World, MPs and govt'; Tuesday), in which he said that former senior civil servant and current Singapore Democratic Party candidate Tan Jee Say 'is utterly wrong'.

Mr Tan headed economic and manpower planning in the Ministry of Trade and Industry, and also served as secretary to late economist Albert Winsemius.

I think his ideas of change make economic sense. Since Singapore has no resource base and has limited manpower, it will be more prudent to maintain only high-value and knowledge-based industries to fuel manufacturing, and phase out labour-intensive industries to neighbouring countries, while still supporting our service industry.

We should not keep on expanding manufacturing industries that employ two foreigners for every one Singaporean because of economic growth, at the expense of compromising our housing, transport, education, health-care services and other social amenities.

I agree with Mr Tan that while we maintain profitable and viable manufacturing industries to keep jobs at appropriate levels, we should also plan for economic growth via other directions that bring more good-paying jobs for Singaporeans. Therefore, using $10 billion to fund the five-year transformation programme is necessary.

Paul Chan

source: http://www.straitstimes.com/STForum/OnlineStory/STIStory_664786.html
 

sense

Alfrescian
Loyal
Jee Say's Economic Manifesto: "Creating jobs and enterprise in a New Singapore economy"

46-page paper (pdf format): http://www.mediafire.com/?bg0r9b6fbbf829c

Would be helpful to JS's cause if his supporters can pass him this message.

"Dear JS,

With reference to 2 sections within your economic manifesto,

1. "Creative industries & Enterprise Regeneration (Pg 24)"

You need to be aware of the existing investment in "Interactive Digital Media" (IDM) which your proponent have allocated billions of dollars into since 2006. As of Sep 2010, an additional $16.1 billion was further allocated to 3 major Science & Technology area, one of which is IDM, similar to what you have in mind. You may want to leverage on various pointers mentioned in their publications to further support your idea.

(a) 2010 Sep: Government commits S$16_1 billion to support Research, Innovation and Enterprise for the next 5 years and seeks ways to solve
(b) 2006 Mar: Science & Technology 2010 Plan, Sustaining Innovation-Driven Growth

I've compiled for you these 2 papers and they can be downloaded (4MB) from here, http://www.mediafire.com/?7fevhlt2v8h7jrq

2. "Manufacturing Re-visited & Industry Regeneration (Pg 26)"

The primary reason why your proponents concluded that you are suggesting the doing away with Manufacturing is from this section of your paper:
2mo5njq.jpg


Did you mean to say
(a) Phasing out manufacturing 100%, or
(b) Phasing out the manufacturing that "depend heavily on unskilled and lowskilled foreign workers" (Pg 9)

If your stand is (a), then you will need to further explain how this phasing out works, eg. over the period of 20 years? 10 years? 5 years? 1 year?

My professional opinion is that if you are looking at a time-frame of 1-5 years, the economic net impact to GDP will likely be negative than positive. If it is 10 to 20 years, it may make more economic sense. Your proponent should not have jump into the conclusion that your time-frame is in the short-term.

Food for thought:
Q1. Do you know of any developed country that do not have a single manufacturing firm?
Q2. What's the manufacturing situation in the United States, UK, Australia, Japan, Korea & Switzerland?

For your consideration.

We wish you the best in your endeavors.

Your anonymous advisor-analyst-supporter,
Sense & Sensibility."
 

Capano2121

Alfrescian
Loyal
GIC never had bad investment! They only had "OVERSIGHT", "MISJUDGEMENT", "WRONG INFORMATION", "CAUGHT UNAWARE", "SLIGHT MISCALCULATION", "POLITICAL VOLATILITY" & "UNEXPECTED TURN OF EVENT".
 

sense

Alfrescian
Loyal
[video=youtube;DrEcOcqW_GQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrEcOcqW_GQ[/video]
[video=youtube;lKNi6PiPwHA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKNi6PiPwHA[/video]
[video=youtube;9FvBRLO6j0U]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FvBRLO6j0U[/video]
[video=youtube;ZoyAIBJcCWg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoyAIBJcCWg[/video]
[video=youtube;1IjL2HszyTE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IjL2HszyTE[/video]
[video=youtube;fG31dZYMbsU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fG31dZYMbsU[/video]
[video=youtube;YfLms5dKYfg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfLms5dKYfg[/video]
 
Last edited:

streetsmart73

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
GIC never had bad investment! They only had "OVERSIGHT", "MISJUDGEMENT", "WRONG INFORMATION", "CAUGHT UNAWARE", "SLIGHT MISCALCULATION", "POLITICAL VOLATILITY" & "UNEXPECTED TURN OF EVENT".


hi there


1. bro, pls add two more: it is a honest mistake and no contingency.
 
Top