• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Support Sharia Law to prevent misunderstanding

fivestars

Alfrescian
Loyal
Sharia refers to the sacred law of Islam. All Muslims believe Sharia is God's law, but they have differences between themselves as to exactly what it entails.

Modernists, traditionalists and fundamentalists all hold different views of Sharia, as do adherents to different schools of Islamic thought and scholarship.

Different countries and cultures have varying interpretations of Sharia, as well.

All Sharia is derived from two primary sources, the divine revelations set forth in the Qur'an, and the sayings and example set by the Prophet Muhammad in the Sunnah. Fiqh, or "jurisprudence," interprets and extends the application of Sharia to questions not directly addressed in the primary sources, by including secondary sources. These secondary sources usually include the consensus of the religious scholars embodied in ijma, and analogy from the Quran and Sunnah through qiyas.

Shia jurists replace qiyas analogy with 'aql, or "reason". Where it enjoys official status, Sharia is applied by Islamic judges, or qadis. Sharia deals with many topics addressed by secular law, including crime, politics and economics, as well as personal matters such as sexuality, hygiene, diet, prayer, and fasting.
 

fivestars

Alfrescian
Loyal
WP and NSP had their own agenda

SDP, USD and RP had their own agenda

SDA had their own agenda

Four conner fight is meaningless

All combine to challenge PAP giant is more meaningful. Right?
 

cleareyes

Alfrescian
Loyal
WP and NSP had their own agenda

SDP, USD and RP had their own agenda

SDA had their own agenda

Four conner fight is meaningless

All combine to challenge PAP giant is more meaningful. Right?

Your 1st post and ur 2nd post does not match at all

Do you even know what you are talking about?

are you posting in the right threat?
 

fivestars

Alfrescian
Loyal
In Malaysia, DAP and PKR can accept PAS. They can share leadership. Different state different party can become Chief Minister. The main problem of among Muslim and Islam too many sects and Holy Books. They still can accept PAS on Sharia Law.

In Singapore, two opposition MP's had 4 to 6 times win in GE but can not accept other parties freedom. One party do not interest to join force with other party like PAP. The other one, can accept other party by command and control other party but the party never grow big and down size.

I am in the lose. How about you?
 

fivestars

Alfrescian
Loyal
For an Example

We had form Singapore People Alliance Party (SPAP) on 16 September 2010. SPAP will manage by a Central Executive Committee that representative of five from each party.

A) The Alliance Party secret ballot can contest by

1) Presidential Election Day: President, Deputy President, Vice President

2) Chief Executive Election Day: Secretary General, Deputy Secretary General, Assistant Secretary General

3) Other Executive Post Election Day: Treasurer, Deputy Treasurer, Assistant Treasurer, Organizing Secretary, Deputy Organizing Secretary and Assistant Organizing Secretary.

4) Those who do not win any post: will remain as ordinary executive committee members.

B) Meeting

1) Monthly Operation meeting on every first Saturday of a month

2) Yearly Annual meeting from 15 August to 16 September.

3) Emergency General Meeting calls up by any component party with one week notice.

4) Meeting can be chair by President or in absent of President will chair by deputy President or in absent of President and Deputy President will chair by Vice President or in absent of all presidents, a temporary elected Acting President to chair the meeting. We cannot cease the meeting because of the absent of Member of Parliament of Singapore. We are in a democratic society.
 

fivestars

Alfrescian
Loyal
KLANG: PAS is mulling over the idea of allowing its non-Muslim members to vote at its annual general meeting, said party president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang.

However, several matters had to be looked into for this to materialise, especially pertaining to the party constitution, he said.

“We need to make many amendments to the constitution for this to happen,” he told reporters after launching the national-level PAS Supporters' Wing here yesterday.

He said the matter would also have to be approved by the Registrar of Societies.

Abdul Hadi said it was important that non-Muslim supporters be given a role in the political struggle of the party through the newly launched wing.

“We have appointed the committee members of the wing at the national-level. They will activate operations at the state-level besides being the representatives of the wing at official functions of the party,” he said, claiming the wing now had 20,000 members. - Bernama
 

fivestars

Alfrescian
Loyal
KUALA LUMPUR: Conflicts of law do arise in a pluralist society like Malaysia, said Federal Court judge Datuk Seri Md Raus Sharif.

"Malaysia is pluralist in every sense. Not only is it multi-ethnic, multi-cultural, multi-lingual and multi-religious, even its law came from a number of sources - English Common Law, Customary Law and Islamic Law.

"Thus, due to the pluralist nature of our law, conflicts of law do arise in Malaysia," said Raus in a keynote address at the two-day 7th Asian Law Institute Conference, here, Tuesday.

The two-day conference themed "Law in Pluralist Asia: Challenges and Prospect", is hosted by the International Islamic University Malaysia's Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws at the university.

Raus, who was representing Chief Justice Tun Zaki Azmi, said that with the existence of two court systems, the Civil Courts and Syariah Courts, it was inevitable that conflicts between the decisions of the two court systems would surface from time to time.

However, he said, the conflicts were confined mainly to matters related to family law, with many instances where the Syariah Courts' decisions were reviewed by the Civil Courts, causing a great deal of anxiety and concern among Muslims in the country.

"Some viewed it as an attempt to undermine the Islamic Law practised in this country, prompting the Islamic jurists and academicians to push for an amendment to the Federal Constitution, to clearly spell out the powers of the Syariah Courts and the Civil Courts.

"This led to the Federal Constitution to be amended in 1988 by inserting a new Article 121(1A) which reads 'the Courts (Civil Courts) referred to in Clause (1) shall have no jurisdiction in respect of any matter within the jurisdiction of the Syariah Court'."

Basically, the amendment provided that the Civil Courts cannot encroach on matters within the jurisdiction of the Syariah Court and the amendment was expected to end the conflict.

"Unfortunately, the conflict continues. The dissatisfaction and rumbling now came from the non-Muslims, especially on the issue of conversion out of Islam by persons who were previously converts to Islam," Raus said.

On this issue, he said, the Civil Courts, whether in first instance or on appeal, had established the precedent that it had no power to decide on the validity of conversions out of Islam by virtue of Article 121(1A) of the Federal Constitution.

"These are among the challenges faced by a pluralist society like Malaysia and the government is fully aware of the problems arising from such cases," he said. - Bernama
 

whoami

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
In exhange I must give up my fingers or limbs?

Like dat manak wu hua?

Thats why Xtians like u are hypocrite. Just go look at your Old Testament. Tons and Tons of your Lord Jesus Laws! Why are u not preaching Laws from Old Testament? Fear that none would embrace xtianity? :rolleyes:
 

fivestars

Alfrescian
Loyal
The Rightly-Guided Caliphate represented the political unity of the Muslim Ummah. Sunni Islam dictates that the head of state, the caliph, should be selected by Shura - elected by Muslims or basis for implementing representative democracy. The caliphate was "the core political concept of Sunni Islam and because of the lack of sharia law the Muslim world was no longer Muslim.

The primary court or Sub Court had the right to help non Muslim and new join Muslim to have option of Sharia Court because their are not in Muslim world yet.
 

fivestars

Alfrescian
Loyal
(5) At any time after the date of the notice of the writ referred to in section 25 and at least 2 clear days before the day of nomination, any person —

(a) belonging to the Malay community who desires to contest as such a person in any election in any constituency designated under section 8A (1) (b) (i); or

(b) belonging to the Indian or other minority communities who desires to contest as such a person in any election in any constituency designated under section 8A (1) (b) (ii),

shall apply in the prescribed manner to the appropriate Committee for a certificate in the prescribed form which shall certify whether the applicant is a person belonging to the Malay community or a person belonging to the Indian or other minority communities, as the case may be, for the purposes of any such election.
 

fivestars

Alfrescian
Loyal
Pattani Thailand, Yala Thailand, Narathiwat Thailand and Mindanao Philippines shall had modern moderate Sharia Law (not Sunni, Salafi and Shi’a states) to manage the states. Songkhla Thailand, Luzon Philippines, Visayas Philippines and Singapore are non Muslim state. The fact reality is now and the past was history.
 
Top