• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Support for Megachurch "Prince"

Hakka Tiow

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
779
Points
0
Home > ST Forum > Online Story
Leaders of charities should be paid well too

I REFER to Monday's report, "$500,000 pay for New Creation Church leader", about the salary of Senior Pastor Joseph Prince.
Our society seems to have developed this mentality that certain professions - particularly charities and other do-ers of good - should not be paid well. I do not understand this sentiment.

Charities, just like other organisations, need to attract talented people to serve as their leaders. If charity executives were paid poorly, we would be left with poorly run charities - and our precious dollars would be inefficiently used.

Of course, it is important for charities to be properly regulated to ensure they are not financially mismanaged. But why should we have a society where only lawyers, doctors and bankers are paid handsomely?

Siddharth George


Latest comments
i think well-paid or not depends on the contributions of that particular individual to the organisation. yes, charitable workers can be paid generously. but what has the pastor done for his organisation and society to warrant such a high pay? maybe it's time that these powerful churches do smth for society at large, rather than just focus on its members and leaders.

i noted that the chinese temple, kwam im hood cho at waterloo street has been giving out bursaries to the needy regularly, regardless of what religion they belong to. also together with the kong ming san monastery, it recently sponsored a mediacorp programme on dealing with diabetes.

i'm curious as to what the rich churches have done for singaporeans, apart from organising entertaining services. if anyone knows, pls post an answer. thanks.

also, why is reverend ming yi being put on trial for a 50K loan when another religious leader is earning 500k? seriously, maybe ming yi shld have just listed the money as his pay and bonus, like this other guy. then he wldn't be on trial now.
Posted by: bluebelle at Thu Apr 02 17:59:34 SGT 2009


robertpclim,

There is a very thin line you are on - on one side is idol worshipping!
The message, not the messenger, may I remind you my friend?
Posted by: commentator_sc at Thu Apr 02 17:21:41 SGT 2009


Leaders of charities should be characters who have the passion to sacrifice their own keep and life for the type/kind of organisations they are representing.
We know who they are genuinely in hearts ,by their frugal lifestyles and simple manners of outreaching to the common folks who will benefit from their leadeship. Lee Kong Chin once reflected"one MUST give back to society what one has taken from the society." Tan Kah Kee, his father-in-law likewise too lead the charities with similar spirit of reaching out to all regardless of his own salary/payment.
These are just two simple examples of characters who had paved the way to prosper our national spirit in charities leadership. To live is to change, and to be perfect is to have changed often. Most of the trouble in the world of charities leadership today is caused by people wanting to be important. Let's help our poverty striken citizens to find it within themselves to live with dignity, not just merely handout. Peace in pure heart charities.
Posted by: singaporean05 at Thu Apr 02 17:20:13 SGT 2009
 
And a "clinton66" lanjiao weh rebuttal!

You made >50K today? Good for you! But remember you can't buy salvation with that nor can you take it with you.

By the way, I don't need to watch the clock, like you apparently have to.
Posted by: commentator_sc at Thu Apr 02 17:15:37 SGT 2009


commentator_sc
seen your replies to the forum at 09:16 AM, 12:12 PM, 12:30 PM and 02:03 PM.
Wonder do you know that the stock just shot up through the roof TODAY. If I were like you spending time logging in to read and reply that frequently, I would not have made >50K from the market in just a matter of hours.

What's my 'hidden' agenda? Many but one of which will be I know you are not as productive as you think you are. If you're in my company, you will be the first in line for the pink slip.

btw I'm replying to your comments now as I've already closed all my positions.

Sportacus
Sometimes I give 50 to the person selling tissue papers knowing the fact that he/she may be a con. If you are as rich as you claim to be, what is tens of thousand dollars to you then?
Posted by: 29125700 at Thu Apr 02 17:00:27 SGT 2009
 
Those who want high pay are not encourage to do charity work and civil servant or goverment work. Because money are donate from people and so do tax payer money.
Their jobs is to work/serve for the people whose support them.
Lawyer/business are different they are not working for the people those people are target for profit/money.
 
who cares abt this? why are you trying to divert attention away from the real life issues that singaporeans face everyday?
 
Please do not blame peasant Siddharth George.

He is merely following the regime's footsteps.

The regime claimed overly paid minions and lackeys are necessary for peasants to endure pay freezes, price hikes, job losses and stay in pigeonholes. It is only right for charities and false religions to employ salesmen to pump up revenue.

This is peasantpore man!
 
Back
Top