Below are the summary of what could went wrong based on my observations:
1) SDP - targeted the wrong GRC (very rich peasants) with their best candidates, CSJ past image also plays a part in voter's decision.
2) SPP - guarded their SMC fortress with the wrong candidate, attacked the GRC with a team of weak candidates.
3) NSP - attacked the GRC with the wrong focus of candidates.
4) RP - attacked the GRC with a team of weak candidates
5) SDA - attacked the SMC and GRC and a team of weak candidates, not willing to make more compromise.
6) WP - attacked some SMC and GRC with a team of weaker candidates
If all parties can better combine their strengths and set aside their differences, they will stand a much better chance to win more seats
1) SDP - targeted the wrong GRC (very rich peasants) with their best candidates, CSJ past image also plays a part in voter's decision.
2) SPP - guarded their SMC fortress with the wrong candidate, attacked the GRC with a team of weak candidates.
3) NSP - attacked the GRC with the wrong focus of candidates.
4) RP - attacked the GRC with a team of weak candidates
5) SDA - attacked the SMC and GRC and a team of weak candidates, not willing to make more compromise.
6) WP - attacked some SMC and GRC with a team of weaker candidates
If all parties can better combine their strengths and set aside their differences, they will stand a much better chance to win more seats
Last edited: