Straits Times Shameful Display of Misandry by Teo Kai Xiang

[MyMother]

The recent article on "incels" is nothing short of a disgraceful hit piece, dripping with misandry and designed to demonize men who are already struggling. It is a textbook example of how mainstream media shamelessly punches down, ridiculing and vilifying those at their lowest instead of offering understanding or solutions.

The article’s entire premise is built on bad faith. It cherry-picks the worst possible examples to paint all lonely, socially struggling men as ticking time bombs, potential terrorists simply for existing without romantic success. This is outright slander. Imagine applying the same broad strokes to women who struggle in dating, calling them "dangerous" or "mentally unstable" based on the actions of a few. The outrage would be deafening.

But when it comes to men, it’s not just acceptable, it’s encouraged.

This isn’t journalism; it’s propaganda. It feeds the growing societal trend where male suffering is treated as a joke or, worse, a threat. Instead of asking why so many young men are increasingly isolated, rising economic pressures, dating dynamics skewed by social media, the disappearance of real-world community structures. This article takes the lazy route: blame men, shame them, and fearmonger for clicks.

Radicalization happens when people feel unheard, unwanted, and discarded. By tarring all struggling men with the same brush, articles like this don’t solve anything, they actively make things worse. They push more men into isolation, into resentment, and into corners where they are met not with help, but with further condemnation. If violence is truly the concern, how does shoving people further into despair help prevent it?

The journalist responsible for this piece should be ashamed. Instead of reporting on the real causes of this issue, they have chosen to sensationalize and smear, worsening an already dire situation. If the goal is a better society, stop treating men’s struggles as a punchline or a threat. Recognize that the more you ostracize, humiliate, and demonize them, the more divided and broken society will become.

 

[MyMother]

https://www.straitstimes.com/life/i...e-minds-of-incels-who-blame-women-and-society

 

[MyMother]

For decades, feminists have championed equality, only when it benefits them. The moment responsibility, sacrifice, or fairness comes into play, the narrative shifts. In Singapore, this hypocrisy is glaring. Men are burdened with obligations women would never accept, yet when they ask for basic fairness, they’re met with mockery, dismissal, or outright hostility.

Equality? Not when it comes to National Service (NS). Singaporean men are forced to give up two years of their lives, followed by years of reservist duties, while women enjoy unrestricted freedom. NS delays education, careers, and financial independence, yet feminists stay silent. Why? Because they have no intention of fighting for true equality when it means sharing sacrifice. Instead, they enjoy the benefits of a nation protected by men, while demanding gender quotas in cushy corporate jobs.

After NS, Singaporean men are thrown into a workforce where they are already behind their female and foreign counterparts. Employers prefer hiring foreigners who didn’t have to waste two years in service, because they are younger, cheaper, and more experienced. Meanwhile, Singaporean women, who never had to put their lives on hold, openly express their preference for foreign men, further alienating local men who have been systemically disadvantaged from the start.

The feminist version of “equality” vanishes when it comes to divorce. Women are treated as helpless victims, regardless of the circumstances, while men are financially bled dry. A husband can be loyal, responsible, and dedicated, but if his wife decides she’s “not happy,” he risks losing half his assets, paying lifelong alimony, and barely seeing his own children. Feminists who claim “strong independent women” have no issue demanding endless financial support from the very men they claim to despise.

Modern feminism doesn’t want equality. It wants supremacy. It wants privileges without responsibilities, rights without obligations, and power without accountability. Women demand the same salaries as men while avoiding the dirty, dangerous jobs that men overwhelmingly take on. They cry about “gender pay gaps” but ignore the death gap, where nearly all workplace deaths involve men. They want men to be providers, protectors, and emotional supporters while simultaneously declaring men obsolete.

If feminists truly believed in equality, they would be fighting for:

-Mandatory NS for women.
-Equal accountability in divorce and alimony.
-Fair hiring practices that don’t favor foreigners over local-born men.

But they won’t. Because that’s not the goal. The goal is to take as much as possible while giving nothing in return.