• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Stop Giving Benefits to New Shitizens Straightaway!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR>Phase in social benefits for new citizens to tweak immigration flow
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I REFER to Mr Ngiam Tong Dow's thoughtful commentary on Thursday, 'Lest we become strangers'. One way to slow down Singapore's population import is to phase in the availability of social services to new immigrants.
Housing benefits, for instance. Instead of making them available as soon as one becomes a citizen, the Government can make them available only after 10 years.
Another example is health benefits. The Government can also tweak its policy on hospitalisation to make it a graduated scheme where the longer you are a citizen, the higher your subsidy. Such measures would iron out the social inequities that currently exist between Singapore-born and new citizens.
After all, as Mr, Ngiam pointed out, 'existing citizens would have paid for those social services over a lifetime of tax payments; the new citizens would not'.
Graduating benefits are nothing new. Many employers, including the civil service, vary annual leave eligibility according to length of service. Some begin with seven days for new employees and raise it to 10 after five years of service, and so on. Long service awards are also given out according to the number of years served.
If migration these days is 'economics-driven', it is perfectly logical for the host country to vary the quantum of social benefits to new immigrants on an economics basis. Such graduated schemes will also have the desired effect of slowing population import, which Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong touched on recently.
As the Government is still searching for ways and means to make existing citizens feel better about its liberal immigration policy and urging them to welcome new citizens with open arms, one other way to achieve this goal is to increase social benefits for the Singapore-born. Make hospitalisation benefits free for Singaporeans at age 62. Such a measure will be greeted warmly by people and make them feel treasured.
Patrick Low
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Rebuttal from FTrash? =>

<TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" class=Post cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Definitely a recipe for disaster... ridiculous suggestions!

This is akin to adopting a child and not treating them as equal to your own kids. That cannot be. Once you are in, you are one of us and represent our name, "regardless or race or religion". We live and die together but you, as a newcomer, adjust to our ways and maybe add to it somewhat. In the end, some adoption works out well and some doesn't...

PRs are guests in our country who should be gracious enough not to demand to be given anything. We strive to be good hosts but they should also behave themselves in what they say and do.
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: clearingsmoke at Sat Sep 26 10:01:56 SGT 2009
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" class=AlternatePost cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>This is a recipe for disaster.

Are you suggesting there be another color (not just blue and pink) for another rank of citizens in Singapore? Citizens are equal under the law and the constitution - you cannot have different 'grades' and benefits for the same category of persons.

Next someone will suggest citizens without the right to vote! There are only two choices here - full citizenship or not (with PR being in a 'half-way house' of some sort).
http://imranwrites.blogspot.com/
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: Charro_1968 at Sat Sep 26 08:55:49 SGT 2009
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" class=Post cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Patrick

I think you are talking out of jealousy. You are completely wrong anyhow. Rather we should give more benefits to new citizens than the existing rotten ones. Any new citizen is a highly educated, well experienced expert in the field. His mother country invested thousands of dollars for his degree. But we in Singapore simply pluck the fruit without watering the plant or nurturing it. Is not the singapore govt selfish and unreasonable? Better correct yourself.
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: ganesharmak at Sat Sep 26 08:15:26 SGT 2009
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Top