• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Startling Revelation By Koh Guek Choo

sgnewsalte

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is a shocking revelation. I bet majority of Singaporeans do not know about this. Companies can hire foreigners living here on dependents' passes just by obtaining a Letter of Consent (LOC) from MOM. Unlike S-passes, there is no local/foreign workers quota, no foreign worker levy or CPF contribution. Now many companies took advantage of this, displacing Singaporeans with such workers. The PAP govt is hiding this from Singaporeans.What has Ng Eng Hen and Gan Kim Yong got to say about this? :mad:


http://www.straitstimes.com/ST+Forum/Online+Story/STIStory_345448.html

When it comes to jobs, S'poreans must come first

<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--> <!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->
IT IS important that the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) enforces stricter rules for employers that hire foreigners.

I wonder if many people know that companies can also hire foreigners living here on dependants' passes by simply obtaining a Letter of Consent (LOC) from MOM.

With such a letter, there is no set quota and no foreign worker levy nor CPF contribution to be paid. Some employers can take advantage of the LOC to hire foreigners instead of locals for positions that can be easily filled by Singaporeans. Shouldn't MOM look into quotas and levies for foreigners applying for work under the LOC category?


Your article on tighter S-pass rules ("Does restricting foreign talent help Singaporeans?") on Saturday cites employers' comments such as Singaporeans not wanting to work for 10 to 12 hours on their feet while foreigners are willing to do so.

First and foremost, should employers make their staff work for 10 to 12 hours on their feet each day? If the business operates such long hours, then there should be two shifts so that all staff work a decent eight-hour shift. Instead, the employers are exploiting foreigners who are so desperate to work here that they are willing to work for 10 to 12 hours, and without overtime pay too.

We certainly do not want to eliminate foreign talent; we just want to make sure that Singaporeans are given priority when jobs become available. In order to do this, the Government must ensure that hiring foreigners doesn't become so easy that employers bypass Singaporeans when looking for employees.

I also strongly feel that the Government should not give Jobs Credit wage subsidies to companies that employ more foreigners than Singaporeans, especially if they have retrenched their local employees while keeping their foreign workers.

We must send out a clear message to employers that Singaporeans should come first.

Koh Guek Choo (Ms)
 
Top