- Joined
- Sep 23, 2008
- Messages
- 661
- Points
- 18
We have someone at the high office reminding people public transport security is about who is paying for it ! Sounds very weird in Singapore history !
What a big joke ! The commuters just want PAP to make sure MRT is safe for people to travel , and that’s all , why talk cock about who is paying the security .
Why ? SMRT is not singapore ? PAP is not in charge of overall security of singapore ?
If terrorists attack Potong Pasir MRT station, it’s Mr Chiam has to be blamed ?
11.5 billions are spent on defending Singapore each year , does it make sense we talk about who pays for SMRT security?
If terrorists attack MRT , is PAP not responsible ?
Whether SMRT or whoever pay for the SMRT security, Singapore has a Home affairs Minister to regulate public security.
MRT is MASS RAPID TRANSPORT---it deals with the public, therefore PAP is directly involved to make sure public security is the first priority !
By saying Taxpayers should not pay for SMRT security , what is the guy trying to tell the world ? Is he trying to please the people and at the same time defending PAP ?
PAP is getting out of hands !
Luckily the swedish art is not a threat, what if it is time-bomb planted ? ……do we still hear “ Taxpayers should not pay for SMRT security “ ?
We should thank the Swedish man, after all.!
You take MRT at your own risk as from now ! Big joke !
What a big joke ! The commuters just want PAP to make sure MRT is safe for people to travel , and that’s all , why talk cock about who is paying the security .
Why ? SMRT is not singapore ? PAP is not in charge of overall security of singapore ?
If terrorists attack Potong Pasir MRT station, it’s Mr Chiam has to be blamed ?
11.5 billions are spent on defending Singapore each year , does it make sense we talk about who pays for SMRT security?
If terrorists attack MRT , is PAP not responsible ?
Whether SMRT or whoever pay for the SMRT security, Singapore has a Home affairs Minister to regulate public security.
MRT is MASS RAPID TRANSPORT---it deals with the public, therefore PAP is directly involved to make sure public security is the first priority !
By saying Taxpayers should not pay for SMRT security , what is the guy trying to tell the world ? Is he trying to please the people and at the same time defending PAP ?
PAP is getting out of hands !
Luckily the swedish art is not a threat, what if it is time-bomb planted ? ……do we still hear “ Taxpayers should not pay for SMRT security “ ?
We should thank the Swedish man, after all.!
You take MRT at your own risk as from now ! Big joke !