• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Sporns Much Better Off Emigrating from This Fcuked Dysfunctional Cuntlee!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Sun, May 03, 2009
The Straits Times

Four reasons Singaporeans stay put abroad
I REFER to last Saturday's article, 'Asia's brain gain'.
I thank The Straits Times for giving readers such an informative and positive article on Asian students heading back to their homeland on work and business.
One key thing I realised is that their respective governments are very supportive of them returning to their homeland, with some even providing funds to help them start viable businesses. This could be the main lure for Asian students to return home after graduation.
I know many Singaporean students have studied and worked abroad, but although the Government has tried all ways to attract them back, many still prefer to stay abroad long after graduation.
I believe there are several reasons for this:
1. Salary. Salary abroad can sometimes be double or treble that locally. Although taxes are high in Australia and Britain, take-home pay is still higher than locally. Thus, there is almost no monetary incentive to return home to take up a local job.
2. Stress. It is an open secret that our working lifestyle here is all work and no play. Many work from 9am to 9pm, with some clocking overtime during weekends. Many local workers also take on many portfolios, stressing them out ultimately. Comparing this to an overseas career that provides a more balanced lifestyle, Singaporeans will naturally prefer a lower-stress work environment. The choice is obvious.
3. Exposure. Many also prefer an overseas working environment that gives them more exposure. They could work with foreigners abroad who tend to think better on their feet and out of the box. Moreover, most local managers here tend to prefer a top-down corporate approach, stifling subordinates from speaking up about their ideas. Singaporeans educated abroad enjoy much more liberty voicing their opinions on any work ideas and will not find the top-down work style here enticing.
4. Entrepreneurship. There is a distinct lack of entrepreneurship in Singapore. Many Singaporeans suffer from a scared-to-lose mentality and when they fail, some cannot even pick themselves up. Thus, for them, it is better not to attempt any business venture unless there is an almost certain chance of success.
With this mentality, our business culture suffers and that is probably why we are breeding a culture of workers and not business creators. When they are laid off, many simply look for another job instead of trying to strike out on their own. In the long run, our economy will be run by foreigners with us locals forming the bulk of the workforce.
Gilbert Goh
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
>>>1. Salary. Salary abroad can sometimes be double or treble that locally. Although taxes are high in Australia and Britain, take-home pay is still higher than locally. Thus, there is almost no monetary incentive to return home to take up a local job.<<<
YET...
Singapore's World Records
On this small island lives the 30 best-paid politicians in the world, comments a blogger. MySingaporeNews.
Apr 3, 2009
As the economic crisis worsens and thousands are being retrenched, the huge salaries of Singapore's political leaders have come under the spotlight not only here - but overseas.
With G20 leaders gathering in London to work out solutions to the global crisis, the Times compiled a list of "the 10 best-paid politicians in the world" - naturally with Singapore's Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong taking the top spot.
The story was picked up by The Australia, which also works out their salaries when ranked against population.
Mr Lee earns S$3.76 million (US$2.47 million) a year, excluding bonuses, allowances, pensions, etc which add on a significant bit.
This is about 54 cents per head of population. In second position was his counterpart from New Zealand at 9 cents. The rest of the world are all down there, below even the lowest-ranking minister in Singapore.
But Singaporean blogger redbean's "My Singapore News" carries a calculation from its reader, Green Peas, expanding on the UK and Australian reports.
It pointed out that the world's 30 best-paid politicians (a definition that will include ministers, elected president, etc) are all from Singapore.
Here's what the blogger says:
The TOP 30 highest paid politicians in the world are all from Singapore:
1. Elected President SR Nathan - S$3.9 million.
2. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong - S$3.8 million.
3. Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew - S$3.5 million.
4. Senior Minister Goh Chok Thong - S$3.5 million.
5. Senior Minister Prof Jayakumar - S$3.2 million.
6. DPM & Home Affairs Minister Wong Kan Seng - S$2.9 million.
7. DPM & Defence Minister Teo Chee Hean - $2.9 million
8. Foreign Affairs Minister George Yeo - S$2.8 million.
9. National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan - S$2.7 million.
10. PMO Miniser Lim Boon Heng - S$2.7 million.
11. Trade and Industry Minister Lim Hng Kiang - S$2.7 million.
12. PMO Minister Lim Swee Say - S$2.6 million.
13. Environment Minister & Muslim Affairs Minister Dr Yaccob Ibrahim - S$2.6 million.
14. Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan - S$2.6 million.

15. Finance Minister S Tharman - S$2.6 million.
16. Education Minister & 2nd Minister for Defence Dr Ng Eng Hen - S$2.6 million.
17. Community Development Youth and Sports Minister - Dr Vivian Balakrishnan - S$2.5 million.
18. Transport Minister & 2nd Minister for Foreign Affairs Raymond Lim Siang Kiat - S$2.5 million.
19. Law Minister & 2nd Minister for Home Affairs K Shanmugam - S$2.4 million.
20. Manpower Minister Gan Kim Yong - S$2.2 million.
21. PMO Minister Lim Hwee Hwa - S$2.2 million.
22. Acting ICA Minister - Lui Tuck Yew - S$2.0 million.
23 to 30 = Senior Ministers of State and Ministers of State - each getting between S$1.8 million to S$1.5 million.
Note: 1. The above pay does not include MP allowances, pensions and other sources of income such as Directorship, Chairmnship, Advisory, Consultancy, etc to Gov-linked and gov-related organisations or foreign MNCs such as Citigroup, etc.
2. Though it is based on an estimate, the data cannot be far off the official salary scales.
The above was posted in redbeanforum by Green Peas.
(London Times report: http://timesbusiness.typepad.com/mon...the-world.html)
http://mysingaporenews.blogspot.com/...icians-in.html
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The CCBs still wanna cut Sporns' pay by another 42%! Diu them, man!

Prime+Minister,+Mr+Lee+Hsien+Loong+4.jpg

You guys say you dun mind har ... I did not say I dun mind, ok !!!
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/cna/20090504/tap-772-survey-shows-sporeans-take-42-pa-231650b.html
Survey shows S’poreans would take 42% pay cut
Channel NewsAsia - 2 hours 14 minutes ago
SINGAPORE: If they lost their jobs, Singaporeans on average think they would be able to cope without their main source of income for eight and a half months.
In survey findings that the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) hopes will guide the future calibration of social support for retrenched individuals, it was noted that younger people and the lower—income would be less resilient. For instance, there were more in their 20s and 30s, than in the older age groups, who would be able to cope for only up to six months.
Eight in 10 respondents would rely mainly on their personal savings.
But while just 31 per cent would step out of their comfort zone to take on any job, tellingly, respondents were on average willing to take a hefty 42—per—cent pay—cut in their next job, should they lose their current one (though the pain threshold for lower—income respondents was far lower at 34 per cent).
Very few people (5 to 7 per cent) would turn to the Government or welfare agencies for help; more (28 per cent) prefer the support of friends and family.
These findings, gathered from 817 Singaporeans and Permanent residents in mid—February, showed that Singapore residents were on the whole a fairly resilient lot, said IPS senior research fellow Gillian Koh. The study is the first of a series to study the perceptions of policies in Singapore.
On the Government’s Budget measures to help Singaporeans through the economic crisis, more believed that the country on the whole was better off as a result — than they believed the measures were helpful on a personal level.
Just 33 per cent felt they were personally better off with the measures, compared with 52 per cent feeling the country was in better stead.
Assistance has not eroded resilience
But overwhelmingly, 82 per cent of Singapore residents felt it was more important to take one’s own initiative to cope with the economic crisis — such as by cutting leisure spending and taking a pay cut — than to depend on the Government.
This sentiment was especially strong among the higher—income group. Just slightly fewer respondents (77 per cent) among the lower—income agreed, with Dr Koh noting that this group has benefited more from Government help.
Even so, the study concluded that while social assistance is still needed by some, "it has not eroded the general sense of self—reliance and the level of resilience" today.
The presence of foreigners in Singapore also came up for examination, and threw up another interesting disparity.
Seven in 10 respondents felt that having foreigners here made no difference to them economically during the crisis. Less than six per cent of any age or income group felt they were personally better off — yet overall, 34 per cent of respondents felt the country as a whole was better off.
The youngest and the low—income groups were more likely to say the country was "worse off" for having foreigners working here.
Overall, more than 50 per cent of the respondents indicated the crisis had made no difference to their savings, income, or employment.
But Dr Koh agreed that it would be interesting to see if perceptions change in a few months, giving how it is early days yet in the economic crisis.
"We’d need to anticipate impact if the crisis worsens," she said. — TODAY/fa
 

Meltdown

Alfrescian
Loyal
Lesser mortal Sinkees are better off migrating to Mexico than remaining in SG!

At least Non-resident foreigners get free accommodation & food at the Aloha resort in Loyang in the eastern part of Singapore.
 
Top