• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

S'pore husband won't renew China bride's long-term visit pass, but said he's reasonab

metalslug

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://tnp.sg/news/story/0,4136,209249,00.html?

Mum: I don't know if I can see my boy again
S'pore husband won't renew China bride's long-term visit pass, but said he's reasonable
By Shree Ann Mathavan

August 01, 2009

NP_NEWS_1_CURRENT_SMWIFE-D9C.jpg

HEARTBROKEN: Madam Tang spending precious time with her son. She is worried he will cry without her

WHEN love sours, it can get downright ugly.

And when one spouse is a foreigner, it can get messy and complicated too.

Madam Tang Feng Jing, 30, a Chinese national, found this out when her Singaporean husband, 30, refused to renew her long-term visit pass to Singapore.

This left Madam Tang no choice but to return to China, leaving her 4-year-son behind with him.

She plans to file for divorce and fight for custody of her son and maintenance from her husband.

But lawyers here say it will be difficult for Madam Tang to do so.

Non-citizens are supposed to live in Singapore for 'three continuous years' before they can file for divorce here, say the lawyers. (See report on facing page.)

And, as a foreigner, she would not be entitled to legal aid.

This legal bind was the furthest thing on Madam Tang's mind when she first met her future husband, a delivery man, through friends in Geylang in 2004.

Soon after their first meeting, she was deported to Liaoning, China, for working here illegally.

Thus began an improbable long-distance courtship via phone calls.

Madam Tang told The New Paper: 'At first, I didn't think we could be together because it was long-distance, but he really made the effort and was very sweet.'

The couple married in China in March 2005. Her husband would visit her there and Madam Tang gave birth to their son.

In December 2006, the family settled in Singapore when Madam Tang, now a housewife, was given a long-term visit pass after her husband wrote to the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority.

Their picture of domestic bliss seemed complete.

Madam Tang moved into her in-laws' four-room HDB flat in Yishun.

The couple registered for their own three-room HDB flat in Yishun last year. The $140,000 flat, which was applied for under the husband's name, was to be ready in 2011.

But now, just four years into their marriage and before their matrimonial home is ready, the couple can barely stand speaking to each other.

Intimate pictures

The ugly turn began in April this year when Madam Tang accused her husband of having an affair.

She claimed to have found some intimate pictures of him and a Thai woman in his digital camera.

She told The New Paper that even before she discovered the photos that 'he would disappear for a week every month'.

'Other times, he would always be on the phone or SMSing,' she added.

She claimed that when she confronted her husband, he admitted to the affair.

But her husband, who declined to be named, denied this.

He told The New Paper yesterday that the photographs were only of a friend and that his wife was making false accusations.

As their relationship soured, he refused to renew his wife's long-term visit pass, which expired on 21 Jul.

He had previously applied for Madam Tang to be a permanent resident twice, in 2007 and 2008, but was turned down both times.

He explained his decision not to renew his wife's pass: 'I thought we needed to have a cooling-off period, so I bought her a plane ticket back home while we thought things out.'

Madam Tang was furious when she found out and refused to go home.

She told The New Paper: 'I wanted to try all ways and means to stay on and be with my son.

'He didn't care about me or that his son would not have a mother by sending me back.'

Things came to a head after the couple made police reports against each other on 16 Jul at the Yishun South neighbourhood police post.

Her husband claimed she had stolen his digital camera while Madam Tang accused her husband of confiscating her passport.

Following the police reports, Madam Tang claimed, her husband kicked her out.

He disputed this, saying: 'I have never chased her out. It was her own choice to leave the flat, saying she wanted to find out about her rights.'

Homeless

During the two weeks that she was homeless, Madam Tang stayed with friends for one week and slept at void decks in Yishun.

During the day, she would spend some time with her son, who's a Singaporean citizen, after picking him up from her in-laws' flat.

Her husband said: 'I have never stopped her from taking our son out because it is her child too. I don't think I was unreasonable.'

Madam Tang twice managed to obtain a week-long visitor's pass, which was due to expire today.

Yesterday, she flew home with a new plane ticket bought with money sent from her family in China.

Speaking to The New Paper while spending her last day in Singapore with her child, she said she had run out of options.

She had tried talking to various lawyers who told her she could not remain here once her visitor's pass ran out.

'It seems like there is no hope for me here. I have no job, no status. I'm not a PR. I want to be with my son, but at the same time, I can't stay here,' she said.

She added tearfully: 'I don't know when and if I can see my son again.

'I'm just worried my son will be sad and cry without his mum. I'm heartbroken to leave him here.'

On his part, her husband said he would 'wait and see' what his estranged wife does.

He said: 'It depends on what she wants. I'm willing to give her time to decide.'

He said he was always generous to her during their relationship.

He claimed to have given her $24,000 to build a house for her family in China and $1,000 to remit to her father earlier this year.

The New Paper was unable to verify his claims as Madam Tang could not be contacted yesterday.

But despite the emotional turmoil, he said: 'I have no regrets, at least I have my son whom I love.'

If Madam Tang does file for divorce, he said: 'I will fight for custody.'
 

metalslug

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: S'pore husband won't renew China bride's long-term visit pass, but said he's reas

http://tnp.sg/news/story/0,4136,209248,00.html?

Lawyers: Tough for mum to fight for custody of son
August 01, 2009




A FOREIGN spouse who is not a permanent resident and can't remain in Singapore legally will find it an uphill task to get a divorce and fight for the custody of the children, said lawyers here.

Lawyer Rajan Chettiar, 43, said of Madam Tang's case: 'It's difficult since she can't remain here.

'Immigration laws can't be flexed for her to be with her son.'


He cited a divorce case he handled in which an Indian national woman returned to Singapore for the divorce proceedings against her Singaporean husband. The couple had no children.

'Getting a social visit pass was tough and she needed a lawyer's letter every time she came back,' said Mr Rajan, who has his own firm.

He noted that Madam Tang could apply to the Family Court for an interim child custody and interim maintenance pending her divorce, but she has to be physically present in Singapore to do so.

Such interim proceedings do take a while as well, he noted.

'Interim custody could easily take six months, while interim maintenance could take anywhere between four and six months.'

Legal costs could also prove expensive for a housewife with no income, he said.

Given that Madam Tang is not a citizen or PR, she is not entitled to legal aid, he added.

Mr Rajan said another thing that would make her divorce difficult is that non-citizens are supposed to live here for 'three continuous years' before being able to file for divorce in Singapore.

Lawyer Koh Tien Hua, 41, from Harry Elias Partnership, pointed out that the courts would not have jurisdiction to consider a divorce before three years.

He said Madam Tang could apply to have that period shortened, which is allowed if she can show that she was treated with 'exceptional cruelty or depravity'.

Limited choices

He noted that while husbands are duty-bound to provide maintenance for their wives, she has to be in Singapore to file for maintenance as well as the divorce.

He said: 'She has to be here to give instructions, so if she is not a permanent resident or works here, I think her options are quite limited.'

Both lawyers said they have not handled many cases like Madam Tang's.
 

ilovechery

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: S'pore husband won't renew China bride's long-term visit pass, but said he's reas

Way to go man! This shld be the way to treat the PRCs!! Its clearly enough that she's out to get her PR & $$ but this spore dude is smart enough to turn against her early, I absolutely have zero sympathy for this PRC chink!!!
 

FuckSamLeong

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: S'pore husband won't renew China bride's long-term visit pass, but said he's reas

Something nice for a change A sinkie fucking a PRC in more ways than one. Give the man a Tiger!
 

allanlee

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: S'pore husband won't renew China bride's long-term visit pass, but said he's reas

WELL DONE !!! MR. SINGKIE :smile:

That's the way to treat them PRC bitches before the WOMENS CHARTER screw you !

F*CK THE WOMENS CHARTER !!!
 

yellow_people

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: S'pore husband won't renew China bride's long-term visit pass, but said he's reas

For every PRC mei mei that loses out, a 1000 SG Chink gets outwitted.:biggrin:
 

ilovechery

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: S'pore husband won't renew China bride's long-term visit pass, but said he's reas

Nabeh, tat's precisely why I always call on all spore dudes to rape the PRC chinks Nanking Massacre style!! Come to think of it, aren't we shld be grateful to the japanese for teaching China chinks a lesson by invading china slaughting china chinks, bro yellow people?
 

Maverick01

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: S'pore husband won't renew China bride's long-term visit pass, but said he's reas

its amazing how they try to skip over the fact that she was working at geylang illegally and the husband met her thru a pimp.....the phrasing of the words are hilarious in their attempt to glide over this part of the story..



http://tnp.sg/news/story/0,4136,209249,00.html?

Mum: I don't know if I can see my boy again
S'pore husband won't renew China bride's long-term visit pass, but said he's reasonable
By Shree Ann Mathavan

August 01, 2009

NP_NEWS_1_CURRENT_SMWIFE-D9C.jpg

HEARTBROKEN: Madam Tang spending precious time with her son. She is worried he will cry without her

WHEN love sours, it can get downright ugly.

And when one spouse is a foreigner, it can get messy and complicated too.

Madam Tang Feng Jing, 30, a Chinese national, found this out when her Singaporean husband, 30, refused to renew her long-term visit pass to Singapore.

This left Madam Tang no choice but to return to China, leaving her 4-year-son behind with him.

She plans to file for divorce and fight for custody of her son and maintenance from her husband.

But lawyers here say it will be difficult for Madam Tang to do so.

Non-citizens are supposed to live in Singapore for 'three continuous years' before they can file for divorce here, say the lawyers. (See report on facing page.)

And, as a foreigner, she would not be entitled to legal aid.

This legal bind was the furthest thing on Madam Tang's mind when she first met her future husband, a delivery man, through friends in Geylang in 2004.

Soon after their first meeting, she was deported to Liaoning, China, for working here illegally.

Thus began an improbable long-distance courtship via phone calls.

Madam Tang told The New Paper: 'At first, I didn't think we could be together because it was long-distance, but he really made the effort and was very sweet.'

The couple married in China in March 2005. Her husband would visit her there and Madam Tang gave birth to their son.

In December 2006, the family settled in Singapore when Madam Tang, now a housewife, was given a long-term visit pass after her husband wrote to the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority.

Their picture of domestic bliss seemed complete.

Madam Tang moved into her in-laws' four-room HDB flat in Yishun.

The couple registered for their own three-room HDB flat in Yishun last year. The $140,000 flat, which was applied for under the husband's name, was to be ready in 2011.

But now, just four years into their marriage and before their matrimonial home is ready, the couple can barely stand speaking to each other.

Intimate pictures

The ugly turn began in April this year when Madam Tang accused her husband of having an affair.

She claimed to have found some intimate pictures of him and a Thai woman in his digital camera.

She told The New Paper that even before she discovered the photos that 'he would disappear for a week every month'.

'Other times, he would always be on the phone or SMSing,' she added.

She claimed that when she confronted her husband, he admitted to the affair.

But her husband, who declined to be named, denied this.

He told The New Paper yesterday that the photographs were only of a friend and that his wife was making false accusations.

As their relationship soured, he refused to renew his wife's long-term visit pass, which expired on 21 Jul.

He had previously applied for Madam Tang to be a permanent resident twice, in 2007 and 2008, but was turned down both times.

He explained his decision not to renew his wife's pass: 'I thought we needed to have a cooling-off period, so I bought her a plane ticket back home while we thought things out.'

Madam Tang was furious when she found out and refused to go home.

She told The New Paper: 'I wanted to try all ways and means to stay on and be with my son.

'He didn't care about me or that his son would not have a mother by sending me back.'

Things came to a head after the couple made police reports against each other on 16 Jul at the Yishun South neighbourhood police post.

Her husband claimed she had stolen his digital camera while Madam Tang accused her husband of confiscating her passport.

Following the police reports, Madam Tang claimed, her husband kicked her out.

He disputed this, saying: 'I have never chased her out. It was her own choice to leave the flat, saying she wanted to find out about her rights.'

Homeless

During the two weeks that she was homeless, Madam Tang stayed with friends for one week and slept at void decks in Yishun.

During the day, she would spend some time with her son, who's a Singaporean citizen, after picking him up from her in-laws' flat.

Her husband said: 'I have never stopped her from taking our son out because it is her child too. I don't think I was unreasonable.'

Madam Tang twice managed to obtain a week-long visitor's pass, which was due to expire today.

Yesterday, she flew home with a new plane ticket bought with money sent from her family in China.

Speaking to The New Paper while spending her last day in Singapore with her child, she said she had run out of options.

She had tried talking to various lawyers who told her she could not remain here once her visitor's pass ran out.

'It seems like there is no hope for me here. I have no job, no status. I'm not a PR. I want to be with my son, but at the same time, I can't stay here,' she said.

She added tearfully: 'I don't know when and if I can see my son again.

'I'm just worried my son will be sad and cry without his mum. I'm heartbroken to leave him here.'

On his part, her husband said he would 'wait and see' what his estranged wife does.

He said: 'It depends on what she wants. I'm willing to give her time to decide.'

He said he was always generous to her during their relationship.

He claimed to have given her $24,000 to build a house for her family in China and $1,000 to remit to her father earlier this year.

The New Paper was unable to verify his claims as Madam Tang could not be contacted yesterday.

But despite the emotional turmoil, he said: 'I have no regrets, at least I have my son whom I love.'

If Madam Tang does file for divorce, he said: 'I will fight for custody.'
 

SamuelStalin

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: S'pore husband won't renew China bride's long-term visit pass, but said he's reas

What happened to the powers of the Women's Charter? You mean... foreign women are not women... and so they are not covered???

Hahahahahahhahahahaa
 
Top